| Literature DB >> 24342523 |
Etienne Loire, Ylenia Chiari, Aurélien Bernard, Vincent Cahais, Jonathan Romiguier, Benoît Nabholz, Joao Miguel Lourenço, Nicolas Galtier.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The giant Galápagos tortoise, Chelonoidis nigra, is a large-sized terrestrial chelonian of high patrimonial interest. The species recently colonized a small continental archipelago, the Galápagos Islands, where it has been facing novel environmental conditions and limited resource availability. To explore the genomic consequences of this ecological shift, we analyze the transcriptomic variability of five individuals of C. nigra, and compare it to similar data obtained from several continental species of turtles.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24342523 PMCID: PMC4053747 DOI: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-12-r136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol ISSN: 1474-7596 Impact factor: 13.583
Specimens sampled in this study
| GA05A | | SRS509366 | Rotterdam Zoo (Netherlands) | clade | 8,995,838 | 793 | |
| GA05G | zuz10 or zuz20 | SRS509367 | A Cupulatta Corsica (France) | clade | 10,770,970 | 987 | |
| GA05H | zuz10 or zuz20 | SRS509368 | A Cupulatta Corsica (France) | clade | 10,247,396 | 940 | |
| GA05E | zuz30 | SRS509369 | Zurich Zoo (Switzerland) | clade | 12,862,334 | 1,143 | |
| GA05F | zuz01 | SRS509370 | Zurich Zoo (Switzerland) | clade | 4,927,381 | 440 | |
| GA05D | | SRS509371 | Montpellier Zoo (France) | | 9,218,341 | 831 | |
| GA03B | SRS509372 | Banyuls (France) | 9,903,466 | 885 |
aThis study.
bAccording to Russello et al. [21].
cNCBI SRA accession id.
dLineage according to Caccone et al. [18] and Russello et al. [21].
Turtle transcriptomic sequence datasets analyzed in this study
| Testudinidae | 5 | Blood | yes | yes | 80,693 | 685 | 10,929 | (1), (2) | |
| Testudinidae | 1 | Blood | no | yes | 11,324 | 536 | 1,236 | (1) | |
| Geoemydidae | 1 | Blood | no | yes | 10,199 | 576 | 1,439 | (1) | |
| Emydidae | 10 | Blood | yes | yes | 68,096 | 720 | 10,503 | (3) | |
| Emydidae | 3 | Blood, brain | yes | yes | 27,235 | 667 | 3,383 | (3), (4) | |
| Cheloniidae | 1 | Blood | yes | no | 31,135 | 509 | 5,142 | (2) | |
| Chelidae | 1 | Blood | yes | no | 45,060 | 563 | 8,066 | (2) |
aNumber of contigs of length >200 bp.
bNumber of ORF of length >100 codons.
c(1): this study; (2) Chiari et al. [22]; (3) Gayral et al. [23]; (4) Tzika et al. [24].
Figure 1Maximum-likelihood coding sequence analysis of 248 genes in eight turtle species. Branch lengths are proportional to time. Branch thickness: number of synonymous changes per million years per 100 synonymous sites. Colors: branch-specific dN/dS ratio.
Robustness of non-synonymous and synonymous diversity estimates in the giant Galápagos tortoise
| A1 | ≥3 | Stringent | 1,053 | 1,933 | 0.18 ±0.03 | 0.35 ±0.06 | -0.14 | -0.30 |
| A2 | ≥4 | Stringent | 968 | 1,538 | 0.18 ±0.03 | 0.34 ±0.06 | -0.12 | -0.34 |
| A3 | 5 | Stringent | 814 | 1,041 | 0.19 ±0.04 | 0.31 ±0.06 | -0.10 | -0.15 |
| B1 | ≥3 | Very stringent | 1,059 | 1,423 | 0.13 ±0.02 | 0.33 ±0.05 | -0.11 | -0.05 |
| B2 | ≥4 | Very stringent | 974 | 1,131 | 0.14 ±0.02 | 0.31 ±0.05 | -0.10 | -0.09 |
| B3 | 5 | Very stringent | 820 | 769 | 0.14 ±0.02 | 0.28 ±0.05 | -0.08 | 0.18 |
| ≥5 | Stringent | 953 | 1,845 | 0.42 ±0.04 | 0.09 ±0.02 | 0.21 | 0.57 |
Figure 2Distribution of population genomic statistics across predicted coding sequences inand. πN/πS distribution: coding sequences for which πS = 0 were omitted. NI distribution: coding sequences for which dS = 0 were omitted.
Figure 3Flanking . coding region diversity in and . πS: average nucleotide diversity at synonymous sites; π5: average nucleotide diversity at 5′-UTR sites; π3: average nucleotide diversity at 3′-UTR sites. Very similar results were obtained when we only analyzed predicted cDNAs for which both coding sequence and 3′ UTR sequence were available, and when we restricted the analysis to the 500 first bases of the 3′ UTR regions.
Figure 4Functional annotation of coding sequences analyzed in and . (a) Pie chart representing the total number of coding sequences from the two species in each category; (b) correlation of category-specific abundance between the two species. Only coding sequences for which we obtained both a GO-slim term annotation and a πN/πS estimate were included. The generic categories used in this figure were defined by grouping terms from the ‘biological process’ GO-slim ontology as indicated in Additional file 3: Table S1, second colon.
Figure 5GO term-specific π/πanalysis inand. Each circle is for a GO-slim term. Circle surface is proportional to the number of associated coding sequences. Left panel: term-average πN/πS ratio in log scale; black square: genomic averages. Right panel: term-specific z-score. Colored circles: z-score significant at the 10% (open) or 5% (close) level. Blue: macromolecule metabolism; cyan: metabolism (other); purple: response to stress; red: immunity. Dotted lines: standard deviation. Letters refer to Additional file 3: Table S1, first colon.