| Literature DB >> 24341851 |
Anna Monika Lewandowska-Sabat, Guro Margrethe Boman, Alison Downing, Richard Talbot, Anne Kristine Storset, Ingrid Olsaker1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the mammary gland, local recruitment and action of macrophages is a key immunological defence mechanism against infection. Macrophages are members of the innate immune system, serve as the first line of the defence against invading pathogens and are critical effectors and regulators of inflammation. We have examined the early phase response of bovine macrophages to infection with live Staphylococcus aureus. Genome-wide transcript profiling of blood monocyte-derived macrophages from six Norwegian Red heifers infected with live S. aureus for 2 and 6 hours in vitro was performed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24341851 PMCID: PMC3878444 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-891
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Hierarchical clustering of 418 genes differentially expressed in macrophages in response to 6 hours post infection. Letters (A-F) denote the six Norwegian Red heifers tested in the study. Uninfected control samples of each individual were used as references, i.e. control and Staphylococcus aureus infected samples from one individual were hybridized to one array. Two dye-swaps (arrays) were used per individual except for individual C, where only one array was produced.
Enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways generated by Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) ( ≤ 0.05)
| NOD-like receptor signaling pathway* | 4.9 × 10-7 | |
| | Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction* | 1.7 × 10-6 |
| | Toll-like receptor signaling pathway* | 6.2 × 10-5 |
| | Asthma* | 9.8 × 10-4 |
| | T cell receptor signaling pathway | 3.6 × 10-3 |
| | Jak-STAT signaling pathway | 4.1 × 10-3 |
| | Apoptosis | 4.4 × 10-3 |
| | Chemokine signaling pathway | 4.9 × 10-3 |
| | Cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway | 1.4 × 10-2 |
| | Allograft rejection | 2.6 × 10-2 |
| | RIG-I-like receptor signaling pathway | 3.0 × 10-2 |
| | Sphingolipid metabolism | 3.0 × 10-2 |
| | Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity | 4.8 × 10-2 |
| | Fc epsilon RI signaling pathway | 4.8 × 10-2 |
| Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction* | 5.2 × 10-4 | |
| | Jak-STAT signaling pathway | 2.8 × 10-3 |
| | Colorectal cancer | 1.4 × 10-2 |
| | Toll-like receptor signaling pathway | 1.8 × 10-2 |
| Pathways in cancer | 2.6 × 10-2 |
A) The list of differentially regulated on microarray (n = 418) and Ensembl reannotated genes was used as an input for functional annotation clustering; B) Subset of these genes (n = 28; List eQG from [18]) was used as an input. Asterisk (*) denotes the significant KEGG pathways after the Benjamini–Hochberg multiple testing correction (p ≤ 0.05).
Top canonical pathways generated by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA)
| TREM1 signaling | 2.71 × 10-11 | 1.69 × 10-1 | IL8, CXCL3, ICAM1, CD40, GRB2, IL10, TLR8, CASP1, IL1B, FCGR2B, NFKB1, TNF | |
| | Hepatic fibrosis/hepatic stellate cell activation | 8.32 × 10-11 | 1.10 × 10-1 | CXCL3, IL8, IL4R, CCR5, ICAM1, CD40, MYL6, IL10, IL6R, IL1B, IFNGR1, CCL5, NFKB1, TNF, CCR7, IL4 |
| | IL-10 signaling | 3.82 × 10-9 | 1.41 × 10-1 | TRAF6, SOCS3, FOS, IL4R, CCR5, MAPK14, IL10, IL1B, FCGR2B, NFKB1, TNF |
| | IL-12 signaling and production in macrophages | 6.87 × 10-9 | 8.97 × 10-2 | IL10, MAF, IFNGR1, NFKB1, IRF1, TRAF6, FOS, MAPK14, CD40, ZNF668, NOS2, TNF, PRKD3, IL4 |
| | IL-17A signaling in gastric cells | 3.33 × 10-8 | 2.80 × 10-1 | IL8, FOS, MAPK14, CCL20, CCL5, NFKB1, TNF |
| Role of cytokines in mediating communication between immune cells | 8.88 × 10-7 | 7.27 × 10-2 | IL8, IFNB1, IL13, IL4 | |
| | Communication between innate and adaptive immune cells | 6.73 × 10-6 | 3.67 × 10-2 | IL8, IFNB1, CCR7, IL4 |
| | Airway inflammation in asthma | 1.81 × 10-5 | 3.33 × 10-1 | IL13, IL4 |
| | Remodeling of epithelial adherens junctions | 1.08 × 10-4 | 4.41 × 10-2 | ACTR3, MAPRE1, CLIP1 |
| Prolactin signaling | 1.5 × 10-4 | 3.75 × 10-2 | SOCS3, FOS, IRF1 |
A) The list of differentially regulated on microarray (n = 418) and Ensembl reannotated genes was used as an input for IPA; B) Subset of these genes (n = 28; List eQG from [18]) was used as an input.
Top molecular and cellular functions identified by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA)
| Cell death and survival | 5.86 × 10-17 – 8.33 × 10-6 | 114 | |
| | Cellular function and maintenance | 5.21 × 10-16 – 5.86 × 10-6 | 73 |
| | Cellular movement | 1.79 × 10-13 – 7.87 × 10-6 | 68 |
| | Cellular development | 2.52 × 10-13 – 6.75 × 10-6 | 105 |
| | Cellular growth and proliferation | 2.52 × 10-13 – 8.04 × 10-6 | 111 |
| Cell death and survival | 7.73 × 10-10 – 9.61 × 10-4 | 14 | |
| | Cellular development | 1.35 × 10-9 – 8.97 × 10-4 | 18 |
| | Cellular growth and proliferation | 1.35 × 10-9 – 8.97 × 10-4 | 18 |
| | Cellular movement | 1.82 × 10-9 – 9.32 × 10-4 | 14 |
| Cellular function and maintenance | 1.06 × 10-8 – 9.32 × 10-4 | 15 |
A) The list of differentially regulated on microarray (n = 418) and Ensembl reannotated genes was used as an input for IPA; B) Subset of these genes (n = 28; List eQG from [18]) was used as an input.
Top networks identified by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA)
| Cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, cardiovascular system development and function, cell morphology | 30 | |
| | Embryonic development, organismal development, cell morphology | 27 |
| | Cell-mediated immune response, cellular movement, hematological system development and function | 26 |
| | Antimicrobial response, cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, embryonic development | 23 |
| | Cell cycle, cellular movement, developmental disorder | 23 |
| Cell death and survival, cellular function and maintenance, cellular growth and proliferation | 20 | |
| | Cellular movement, hematological system development and function, immune cell trafficking | 14 |
| | Cellular assembly and organization, cellular compromise, cellular function and maintenance | 8 |
| | Antimicrobial response, cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, cellular movement | 5 |
| Reproductive system disease, embryonic development, organismal development | 3 |
A) The list of differentially regulated on microarray (n = 418) and Ensembl reannotated genes was used as an input for IPA; B) Subset of these genes (n = 28; List eQG from [18]) was used as an input.
Figure 2Functional network over-represented in a list of differentially expressed genes on the microarray involving () complex and associated molecules with a network score of 31, as identified by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). Red denotes molecules that were up-regulated and green denotes molecules down-regulated in response to 6 hours infection with live Staphylococcus aureus in bovine macrophages.
Figure 3Functional network over-represented in the subset of the differentially regulated genes (List eQG) involving (), and () and associated molecules with a network score of 20, as identified by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). List eQG consist of genes that resulted from combining of the differentially regulated genes on the microarray (n = 418) with marker positions from a study of quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting susceptibility to mastitis in Norwegian Red cattle [26]. Red denotes molecules that were up-regulated in response to 6 hours infection with live Staphylococcus aureus in bovine macrophages.
Top upstream regulators identified by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA)
| CD40 ligand (CD154) | 2.25 × 10-24 | |
| | TNF receptor superfamily member 5 (CD40) | 1.05 × 10-22 |
| | Interleukin 10 (IL-10) | 1.01 × 10-21 |
| | 5′-inosinic acid (poly rI:rC) | 1.73 × 10-20 |
| | Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) | 6.21 × 10-20 |
| Peptidoglycan | 1.79 × 10-13 | |
| | Suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1) | 7.66 × 10-13 |
| | Tyrphostin AG490 (AG490) | 1.71 × 10-12 |
| | Interleukin 10 (IL-10) | 3.52 × 10-12 |
| Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) | 3.55 × 10-12 |
A) The list of differentially regulated on microarray (n = 418) and Ensembl reannotated genes was used as an input for IPA; B) Subset of these genes (n = 28; List eQG from [18]) was used as an input.
Figure 4Upstream regulators and their target molecules in datasets as identified by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). A – The list of differentially regulated on microarray (n = 418) and Ensembl reannotated genes was used as an input for analysis; B – Subset of these genes (n = 28; List eQG from [18]) was used as an input. Molecules in red denote up-regulation, molecules in green denote down-regulation and molecules in orange denote predicted activation in response to 6 hours infection with live Staphylococcus aureus in bovine macrophages. Lines in orange denote predicted activation; lines in blue - predicted inhibition; lines in yellow - findings inconsistent with state of downstream molecule; and lines in grey - effect not predicted.
Figure 5Comparison of mRNA gene expression between the microarray and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Genes that have shown a significant difference in expression between Staphylococcus aureus infected cells and uninfected control cells in RT-qPCR analysis are denoted with p ≤ 0.05 and non-significant genes in RT-qPCR are denoted with p > 0.05. Genes that have shown a divergent expression pattern in the RT-qPCR analysis compared to the microarray experiment are denoted with ≠. Bcl2-antagonist of cell death (BAD), caspase 1 (CASP1), chemokine c-c motif ligand 5 (CCL5), chemokine c-c motif receptor 5 (CCR5), v-fos fbj murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog (FOS), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM1), interferon beta (IFNb), interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1), mitogen-activated protein kinase 14, p38 (MAPK14), p21/cdc42/rac1-activated kinase 1 (PAK1), remodeling and spacing factor 1 (RSF1), Toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFa). Peptidylprolyl isomerase A (PPIA) was used as a reference gene.
Figure 6Hypothetical mechanism of alternative activation of macrophages in response to infection. Left panel – Staphylococcus aureus enters the macrophage through the Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2)-dependent pathway that initiates nuclear factor kappa B (NFKB)-mediated temporal inflammatory response. Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (TREM1) synergizes with TLR2 that stimulates intracellular signals resulting in phagocytosis and production of proinflammatory cytokines. NFKB induces expression of co-stimulatory receptor tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 5 (CD40). After phagosomal escape into the cytosol Staphylococcus aureus peptidoglycan induces nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2) expression that in turn triggers inflammation. The macrophage is induced to produce interleukin 4 (IL-4) and IL-13 as confirmed by our study. Right panel – hypothetical alternative activation pathway triggered by IL-4 and IL-13, likely a mechanism by which Staphylococcus aureus evades the host immune response. Alternatively activated macrophage produces anti-inflammatory IL-10, which inhibits classical macrophage activation. Caspase 1(CASP1); interleukin 4 receptor (IL-4R); interleukin 13 receptor (IL-13R); Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT).
Microarray hybridization design
| Individual | A | B | C | D | E | F | Total |
| 2 h incubation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
| 6 h incubation | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 |
Uninfected control samples were used as references, i.e. control and Staphylococcus aureus infected samples from one individual at one time point were hybridized to one array. Dye-swap design was used, i.e. uninfected control samples were labeled with Cy5 and Staphylococcus aureus infected samples were labeled with Cy3, and subsequently swap labeling was applied.