Literature DB >> 24341496

Immunogenicity and PK/PD evaluation in biotherapeutic drug development: scientific considerations for bioanalytical methods and data analysis.

Yow-Ming C Wang1, Vibha Jawa, Mark Ma.   

Abstract

With the advent of novel technologies, considerable advances have been made in the evaluation of the relationship between PK and PD. Ligand-binding assays have been the primary assay format supporting PK and immunogenicity assessments. Critical and in-depth characterizations of the ligand-binding assay of interest can provide valuable understanding of the limitations, for interpreting PK/PD and immunogenicity results. This review illustrates key challenges with regard to understanding the relationship between anti-drug antibody and PK/PD, including confounding factors associated with the development and validation of ligand-binding assays, mechanisms by which anti-drug antibody impacts PK/PD, factors to consider during data analyses and interpretation, and a perspective on integrating immunogenicity data into the well-established quantitative modeling approach. Through recognizing these challenges, we propose some opportunities for improvements in the development and validation of fit-for-purpose bioanalytical methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24341496     DOI: 10.4155/bio.13.302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioanalysis        ISSN: 1757-6180            Impact factor:   2.681


  8 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating and Reporting the Immunogenicity Impacts for Biological Products--a Clinical Pharmacology Perspective.

Authors:  Yow-Ming C Wang; Jie Wang; Yuen Yi Hon; Lin Zhou; Lanyan Fang; Hae Young Ahn
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Evaluating a Multiscale Mechanistic Model of the Immune System to Predict Human Immunogenicity for a Biotherapeutic in Phase 1.

Authors:  Lora Hamuro; Giridhar S Tirucherai; Sean M Crawford; Akbar Nayeem; Renuka C Pillutla; Binodh S DeSilva; Tarek A Leil; Craig J Thalhauser
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Evaluation of Multiple Immunoassay Technology Platforms to Select the Anti-Drug Antibody Assay Exhibiting the Most Appropriate Drug and Target Tolerance.

Authors:  Justine Collet-Brose; Pierre-Jean Couble; Maureen R Deehan; Robert J Nelson; Walter G Ferlin; Sabrina Lory
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.818

Review 4.  Assessment of disulfide and hinge modifications in monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Bernd Moritz; Jan Olaf Stracke
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 5.  Clinical Pharmacology and Translational Aspects of Bispecific Antibodies.

Authors:  A Trivedi; S Stienen; M Zhu; H Li; T Yuraszeck; J Gibbs; T Heath; R Loberg; S Kasichayanula
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.689

6.  Association of immune response with efficacy and safety outcomes in adults with phenylketonuria administered pegvaliase in phase 3 clinical trials.

Authors:  Soumi Gupta; Kelly Lau; Cary O Harding; Gillian Shepherd; Ryan Boyer; John P Atkinson; Vijaya Knight; Joy Olbertz; Kevin Larimore; Zhonghu Gu; Mingjin Li; Orli Rosen; Stephen J Zoog; Haoling H Weng; Becky Schweighardt
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 8.143

7.  Antibodies against PEGylated enzymes: Treat them with respect!

Authors:  Frank Rutsch
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 8.143

8.  Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and immunogenic rationale for optimal dosing of pegvaliase, a PEGylated bacterial enzyme, in adult patients with phenylketonuria.

Authors:  Yulan Qi; Gina Patel; Joshua Henshaw; Soumi Gupta; Joy Olbertz; Kevin Larimore; Cary O Harding; Markus Merilainen; Roberto Zori; Nicola Longo; Barbara K Burton; Mingjin Li; Zhonghua Gu; Stephen J Zoog; Haoling H Weng; Becky Schweighardt
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.689

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.