Literature DB >> 24338115

The impact of noninvasive prenatal testing on the practice of maternal-fetal medicine.

Lara A Friel1, Jennifer L Czerwinski1, Claire N Singletary2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) via cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal circulation is a highly sensitive and specific new testing option. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of NIPT on the uptake of first trimester screening (FTS) and invasive genetic testing. STUDY
DESIGN: Uptake of prenatal testing was investigated in women referred for advanced maternal age or abnormal screening to the University of Texas Health Maternal-Fetal Medicine Clinics in Houston. Patients who presented from August to November 2011, before clinical introduction of NIPT, were compared with patients who presented from March to June 2012, after its introduction.
RESULTS: In patients referred between 14 and 22 weeks gestational age, invasive genetic testing was significantly reduced following the introduction of NIPT (35.4 vs. 17.9%, p < 0.05). For patients referred at < 14 weeks gestational age, FTS was significantly reduced with NIPT introduction (89.1 vs. 59.1%, p < 0.05); however, invasive genetic testing was not significantly different (20.0 vs. 14.0%, p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: NIPT has made an impact on the practice of maternal-fetal medicine by significantly decreasing the number of second trimester diagnostic tests performed. In addition, patients interested in early screening information appear to prefer the higher sensitivity and specificity of NIPT. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24338115     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1359717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  6 in total

1.  Attitudes Toward and Uptake of Prenatal Genetic Screening and Testing in Twin Pregnancies.

Authors:  Kathryn M Reese; Jennifer Czerwinski; Sandra Darilek; Anthony Johnson; Malorie Jones; Claire N Singletary
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Noninvasive prenatal testing in routine clinical practice for a high-risk population: Experience from a center.

Authors:  Guijie Qi; Jianping Yi; Baosheng Han; Heng Liu; Wanru Guo; Chong Shi; Lirong Yin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  False Low-Risk Single Nucleotide Polymorphism-Based Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in Pentasomy 49,XXXXY.

Authors:  Manesha Putra; Melissa A Hicks; Jacques S Abramowicz
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2018-01-19

4.  Knowledge and future preference of Chinese women in a major public hospital in Hong Kong after undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for positive aneuploidy screening: a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Kam On Kou; Chung Fan Poon; Wai Ching Tse; Shui Lam Mak; Kwok Yin Leung
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part I-clinical impact.

Authors:  Dick Oepkes; G C Lieve Page-Christiaens; Caroline J Bax; Mireille N Bekker; Catia M Bilardo; Elles M J Boon; G Heleen Schuring-Blom; Audrey B C Coumans; Brigitte H Faas; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Attie T Go; Lidewij Henneman; Merryn V E Macville; Eva Pajkrt; Ron F Suijkerbuijk; Karin Huijsdens-van Amsterdam; Diane Van Opstal; E J Joanne Verweij; Marjan M Weiss; Erik A Sistermans
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Change in rates of prenatal tests for chromosomal abnormality over a 12-year period in women of advanced maternal age.

Authors:  Soo Min Kim; Hyun Hee Kim; You Jung Han; June Seek Choi; Hyun Mee Ryu; Seongwoo Yang; Min Hyoung Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-06-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.