Literature DB >> 24337878

Are bovine pericardium underlay xenograft and butterfly inlay autograft efficient for transcanal tympanoplasty?

Clotilde de Dorlodot1, Gersende De Bie, Naima Deggouj, Monique Decat, Jean-Marc Gérard.   

Abstract

To evaluate the success rate and the surgical procedure of two different transcanal myringoplasty techniques using the Tutopatch(®) (Tutogen Medical, Inc., Alachua, FL, USA), a xenograft produced from bovine pericardium or the butterfly, an inlay tragal cartilage autograft. This is a retrospective study. We studied all cases of transcanal myringoplasty with Tutopatch and butterfly, performed by the same surgeon between April 2005 and May 2013. Perforations were secondary to chronic otitis media without cholesteatoma, perforation post ventilation tube or trauma. They were not exceeding one-third of the tympanic membrane surface for the Tutopatch and one quarter for the butterfly. We evaluated the anatomical success rate, complications and postoperative hearing results in both techniques. A total of 106 myringoplasties were performed: 66 with Tutopatch and 40 with butterfly with a mean follow-up of 16.5 and 5.2 months, respectively. Successful closure rates of Tutopatch and butterfly were 75.8% (P < 0.0001) and 85.0% (P < 0.0001), respectively. Myringitis controlled with topical antibiotics treatment occurred in 8 (12.1%) and 5 (12.5%) cases. Eighty percent of patients with Tutopatch had a mean residual air-bone gap within 10 dB, compared to 85.0% in patients with butterfly. When anatomically feasible, a transcanal approach myringoplasty with a Tutopatch(®) graft or butterfly appears to provide good anatomical and functional results. We show that both techniques provide good anatomical and functional results. The butterfly has the advantage to use an autograft, which is surgically easier because it does not require tympanomeatal flap elevation. We recommend the butterfly technique for non-marginal perforation not exceeding one quarter of the tympanic membrane after excision of the perforation edge and Tutopatch for bigger perforation or when standard autografts are not available. Myringitis is the only described complication without specific incidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24337878     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2855-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  14 in total

1.  Office myringoplasty with alloderm.

Authors:  D Saadat; M Ng; S Vadapalli; U K Sinha
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Inlay tympanoplasty: cartilage butterfly technique.

Authors:  R D Eavey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Evaluation of inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  M Mauri; J F Lubianca Neto; S C Fuchs
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Bovine pericardium for duraplasty: clinical results in 32 patients.

Authors:  R Filippi; M Schwarz; D Voth; R Reisch; P Grunert; A Perneczky
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Bovine pericardium (Tutopatch) wrap for hydroxyapatite implants.

Authors:  M Gupta; F Lyon; A D Singh; P A Rundle; I G Rennie
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Revision myringoplasty with solvent-dehydrated human dura mater (Tutoplast).

Authors:  S Yetişer; F Tosun; B Satar
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Bovine pericardium for dural graft: clinical results in 22 patients.

Authors:  A Baharuddin; B T Go; M N A R Firdaus; J Abdullah
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.876

8.  Equine versus bovine pericardium in transmeatal underlay myringoplasty.

Authors:  Roberto Albera; Federico Dagna; Michelangelo Lacilla; Andrea Canale
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  [Clinical experiences with dehydrated temporalis fascia in tympanoplasty. Early and late results].

Authors:  C T Haid
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Fat graft myringoplasty after unsuccessful tympanic membrane repair.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorino; Franco Barbieri
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 3.236

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparing the outcome of tympanoplasties using bovine pericardium underlay xenografts versus butterfly inlay autografts.

Authors:  Zhufang Jiang; Zihan Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A Comprehensive Comparison of Bovine and Porcine Decellularized Pericardia: New Insights for Surgical Applications.

Authors:  Sabra Zouhair; Eleonora Dal Sasso; Sugat R Tuladhar; Catia Fidalgo; Luca Vedovelli; Andrea Filippi; Giulia Borile; Andrea Bagno; Massimo Marchesan; De Rossi Giorgio; Dario Gregori; Willem F Wolkers; Filippo Romanato; Sotirios Korossis; Gino Gerosa; Laura Iop
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-02-28

3.  An alternative to skin graft for superficial surgical defect in oral cancer surgery.

Authors:  Giancarlo Tirelli; Margherita Tofanelli; Alice Piccinato; Francesca Boscolo Nata
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.