Lucia Patriarca1, Mayla Letteriello1, Ernesto Di Cesare1, Antonio Barile1, Massimo Gallucci2, Alessandra Splendiani3. 1. Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, Radiology Unit, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy. 2. Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, Neuroradiology Unit, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy. 3. Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, Neuroradiology Unit, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy alessandra.splendiani@cc.univaq.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate interobserver agreement in the definition of spine instability among spine neuroradiologists with or without experience in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two expert neuroradiologists and two residents retrospectively evaluated the pre-operative dynamic MRI examinations of patients with vertebral instability. Segmental motion, defined as excessive (more than 3 mm) translational motion from supine to upright, was investigated in 103 subjects (309 segments) using kinetic MRI. Radiographic parameters which can help indicate segmental instability include disc degeneration, facet joint osteoarthritis, and ligament flavum hypertrophy. These three radiographic parameters were simultaneously evaluated, and the combinations corresponding to significant segmental instability at each level were determined. The agreement among the neuroradiologists was calculated using the kappa coefficient. All patients had neurosurgical intervention to stabilize the spine. RESULTS: Agreement was high among experienced and non-experienced neuroradiologists. Agreement was nearly perfect for spinal location of spinal instability. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the experience of the evaluator has a low impact on the assessment of spinal instability if correct classification is used. The interobserver agreement confirms the usefulness and safety of kinetic MRI in the correct diagnosis of spinal instability even by less experienced evaluators.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate interobserver agreement in the definition of spine instability among spine neuroradiologists with or without experience in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two expert neuroradiologists and two residents retrospectively evaluated the pre-operative dynamic MRI examinations of patients with vertebral instability. Segmental motion, defined as excessive (more than 3 mm) translational motion from supine to upright, was investigated in 103 subjects (309 segments) using kinetic MRI. Radiographic parameters which can help indicate segmental instability include disc degeneration, facet joint osteoarthritis, and ligament flavum hypertrophy. These three radiographic parameters were simultaneously evaluated, and the combinations corresponding to significant segmental instability at each level were determined. The agreement among the neuroradiologists was calculated using the kappa coefficient. All patients had neurosurgical intervention to stabilize the spine. RESULTS: Agreement was high among experienced and non-experienced neuroradiologists. Agreement was nearly perfect for spinal location of spinal instability. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the experience of the evaluator has a low impact on the assessment of spinal instability if correct classification is used. The interobserver agreement confirms the usefulness and safety of kinetic MRI in the correct diagnosis of spinal instability even by less experienced evaluators.
Authors: Friederike Lattig; Tamás F Fekete; Dieter Grob; Frank S Kleinstück; Dezsö Jeszenszky; Anne F Mannion Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Marco Perri; Giuseppe Grattacaso; Valeria di Tunno; Claudia Marsecano; Antonio Gennarelli; Giulia Michelini; Alessandra Splendiani; Ernesto Di Cesare; Carlo Masciocchi; Massimo Gallucci Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: A Fujiwara; T H Lim; H S An; N Tanaka; C H Jeon; G B Andersson; V M Haughton Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: A Barile; F Bruno; S Mariani; F Arrigoni; L Brunese; M Zappia; A Splendiani; E Di Cesare; C Masciocchi Journal: Musculoskelet Surg Date: 2017-02-14
Authors: A Splendiani; F D'Orazio; L Patriarca; F Arrigoni; F Caranci; P Fonio; L Brunese; A Barile; E Di Cesare; C Masciocchi Journal: Musculoskelet Surg Date: 2017-02-06
Authors: Alessandro Liguori; Federica Galli; Martina Gurgitano; Anna Borelli; Marco Pandolfi; Ferdinando Caranci; Alberto M Magenta Biasina; Giovanni G M Pompili; Claudia L Piccolo; Vittorio Miele; Carlo Masciocchi; Giampaolo Carrafiello Journal: Acta Biomed Date: 2018-01-19
Authors: Federico Bruno; Antonio Barile; Francesco Arrigoni; Antonella Laporta; Anna Russo; Marina Carotti; Alessandra Splendiani; Ernesto Di Cesare; Carlo Masciocchi Journal: Acta Biomed Date: 2018-01-19