Literature DB >> 24337751

Implementing a clinical pathway for hip fractures; effects on hospital length of stay and complication rates in five hundred and twenty six patients.

Paul T P W Burgers1, Esther M M Van Lieshout, Joost Verhelst, Imro Dawson, Piet A R de Rijcke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Modern management of the elderly with a hip fracture is complex and costly. The aim of this study was to compare the treatment-related hospital length of stay (HLOS) before and after implementing a clinical pathway for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.
METHODS: This was a retrospective, before-and-after study. The first period ranged from June 21, 2008 to November 1, 2009 (N = 212), and the second was from January 7, 2010 to July 7, 2011 (N = 314). The electronic hospital system and patients records were reviewed for demographics, HLOS, mortality, complications and readmissions.
RESULTS: In the first period 53 % had a femoral neck fracture, of which 57 % were treated with hemiarthroplasty. In the second period this was 46 % and 71 %. Pertrochanteric fractures were treated with a Gamma nail in 85 % in the first period, and in 92 % in the second period. The median HLOS decreased from nine to six days (p < 0.001). For the hemiarthroplasty group HLOS decreased from nine to seven days (p < 0.001); for internal fixation there was no significant difference (five versus six days, p = 0.557) and after Gamma nailing it decreased from ten to six days (p < 0.001). For mortality no statistically significant difference was found (6 % versus 5 %, p = 0.698). Complications decreased for the Gamma nail group (44 % versus 31 %, p = 0.049). Readmissions for the total group were not different (16 % versus 17 %, p = 0.720).
CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a clinical pathway for hip fractures is a safe way to reduce the HLOS and it improves the quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24337751      PMCID: PMC3997766          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2218-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  19 in total

1.  Overcoming resistance to implementation of integrated care pathways in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Blaine T Manning; Charles D Callahan; Brooke S Robinson; Daniel Adair; Khaled J Saleh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Displaced intracapsular hip fractures in fit, older people: a randomised comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J F Keating; A Grant; M Masson; N W Scott; J F Forbes
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 3.  Optimal setting and care organization in the management of older adults with hip fracture.

Authors:  A Giusti; A Barone; M Razzano; M Pizzonia; G Pioli
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 2.874

4.  Early discharge of hip fracture patients from hospital: transfer of costs from hospital to nursing home.

Authors:  Romke van Balen; Ewout W Steyerberg; Herman J M Cools; Johan J Polder; J Dik F Habbema
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-10

5.  The effectiveness of implementing a care pathway for femoral neck fracture in older people: a prospective controlled before and after study.

Authors:  Helen C Roberts; Ruth M Pickering; Elizabeth Onslow; Mike Clancy; Jackie Powell; Alison Roberts; Kerry Hughes; Diane Coulson; Jane Bray
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.668

6.  [Replacement of the femoral head due to fracture of the hip: prognostic factors for the duration of hospitalisation, institutionalisation and mortality].

Authors:  G C Tjiang; C L Koppert; E Th Hermans; L M Poelhekke; I Dawson
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2003-12-13

7.  A cost-utility analysis of a comprehensive orthogeriatric care for hip fracture patients, compared with standard of care treatment.

Authors:  Gary Ginsberg; Abraham Adunsky; Iris Rasooly
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Influence of optimised treatment of people with hip fracture on time to operation, length of hospital stay, reoperations and mortality within 1 year.

Authors:  Ami Hommel; Kerstin Ulander; Karin B Bjorkelund; Per-Ola Norrman; Hans Wingstrand; Karl-Göran Thorngren
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Measures of clinical outcome before, during, and after implementation of a comprehensive geriatric hip fracture program: is there a learning curve?

Authors:  Cory A Collinge; Kindra McWilliam-Ross; Michael J Beltran; Tara Weaver
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  The hip fracture incidence curve is shifting to the right.

Authors:  Ulrica Bergström; Håkan Jonsson; Yngve Gustafson; Ulrika Pettersson; Hans Stenlund; Olle Svensson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  What are the risk factors for post-operative infection after hip hemiarthroplasty? Systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Thibaut Noailles; Kévin Brulefert; Antoine Chalopin; Pierre Marie Longis; François Gouin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Research and Development of Semantics-based Sharable Clinical Pathway Systems.

Authors:  Hua-Qiong Wang; Tian-Shu Zhou; Yi-Fan Zhang; Li Chen; Jing-Song Li
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Effect on Completion of Clinical Pathway for Improving Clinical Indicator: Cases of Hospital Stay, Mortality Rate, and Comprehensive-Volume Ratio.

Authors:  Hiroki Furuhata; Kenji Araki; Taisuke Ogawa; Mitsuru Ikeda
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Distal locked and unlocked nailing for perthrochanteric fractures--a prospective comparative randomized study.

Authors:  Xing Li; Liping Zhang; Zhiyong Hou; Zhao Meng; Wei Chen; Pengcheng Wang; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  Michael Blauth; Alexander Joeris; Elke Rometsch; Kathrin Espinoza-Rebmann; Pannida Wattanapanom; Rahat Jarayabhand; Martijn Poeze; Merng K Wong; Ernest B K Kwek; Johannes H Hegeman; Carlos Perez-Uribarri; Enrique Guerado; Thomas J Revak; Sebastian Zohner; David Joseph; Markus Gosch
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Hospital case volume and outcomes for proximal femoral fractures in the USA: an observational study.

Authors:  David Metcalfe; Ali Salim; Olubode Olufajo; Belinda Gabbe; Cheryl Zogg; Mitchel B Harris; Daniel C Perry; Matthew L Costa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Clinical Pathway for Elderly Patients With Hip Fracture: A Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study.

Authors:  P H S Kalmet; B B Koc; B Hemmes; R H M Ten Broeke; G Dekkers; P Hustinx; M G Schotanus; P Tilman; H M J Janzing; J M A Verkeyn; P R G Brink; M Poeze
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2016-05-02

8.  Long-term Patient-reported Quality of Life and Pain After a Multidisciplinary Clinical Pathway for Elderly Patients With Hip Fracture: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.

Authors:  Pishtiwan H S Kalmet; Stijn G C J de Joode; Audrey A A Fiddelers; Rene H M Ten Broeke; Martijn Poeze; Taco Blokhuis
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2019-06-06

9.  Hip Fractures: Therapy, Timing, and Complication Spectrum.

Authors:  Dominik Saul; Juliane Riekenberg; Jan C Ammon; Daniel B Hoffmann; Stephan Sehmisch
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.071

10.  Osteoporotic Hip and Spine Fractures: A Current Review.

Authors:  Lisa K Cannada; Brian W Hill
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.