OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether a care pathway for older hip fracture patients can reduce length of stay while maintaining the quality of clinical care. DESIGN: Prospective study of patients admitted 12 months before and after implementation of a care pathway for the management of femoral neck fracture. Audit data for corresponding time periods from nearby orthopaedic units was used to control for secular trends. SETTING: Teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Patients aged 65 years and over with a femoral neck fracture. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: multiple fractures, fractures due to malignancy, re-fracture, total hip replacement, previously entered into the study, operation performed elsewhere. Three-hundred and ninety-five (99%) and 369 (97%) case records were available for full analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: primary outcome: length of stay on the orthopaedic unit. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: ambulation at discharge, discharge destination, in-hospital complications, 30 day mortality, readmission within 30 days of discharge, post-operative days the patient first sat out of bed and walked. RESULTS: Mean length of stay increased by 6.5 days (95% confidence interval 3.5-9.5 days, P < 0.0005) in the second period with a significant improvement in ambulation on discharge (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.6, P = 0.033) and a trend towards reduction in admission to long term care (odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.3-1.0, P = 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: This care pathway was associated with longer hospital stay and improved clinical outcomes. Care pathways for hip fracture patients can be a useful tool for raising care standards but may require additional resources.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether a care pathway for older hip fracturepatients can reduce length of stay while maintaining the quality of clinical care. DESIGN: Prospective study of patients admitted 12 months before and after implementation of a care pathway for the management of femoral neck fracture. Audit data for corresponding time periods from nearby orthopaedic units was used to control for secular trends. SETTING: Teaching hospital. SUBJECTS:Patients aged 65 years and over with a femoral neck fracture. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: multiple fractures, fractures due to malignancy, re-fracture, total hip replacement, previously entered into the study, operation performed elsewhere. Three-hundred and ninety-five (99%) and 369 (97%) case records were available for full analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: primary outcome: length of stay on the orthopaedic unit. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: ambulation at discharge, discharge destination, in-hospital complications, 30 day mortality, readmission within 30 days of discharge, post-operative days the patient first sat out of bed and walked. RESULTS: Mean length of stay increased by 6.5 days (95% confidence interval 3.5-9.5 days, P < 0.0005) in the second period with a significant improvement in ambulation on discharge (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.6, P = 0.033) and a trend towards reduction in admission to long term care (odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.3-1.0, P = 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: This care pathway was associated with longer hospital stay and improved clinical outcomes. Care pathways for hip fracturepatients can be a useful tool for raising care standards but may require additional resources.
Authors: Lauren A Beaupre; C Allyson Jones; L Duncan Saunders; D William C Johnston; Jeanette Buckingham; Sumit R Majumdar Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ernst J Müller; Ingeborg Gerstorfer; Peter Dovjak; Bernhard Iglseder; Georg Pinter; Walter Müller; Katharina Pils; Peter Mikosch; Michaela Zmaritz; Monique Weissenberger-Leduc; Markus Gosch; Heinrich W Thaler Journal: Wien Med Wochenschr Date: 2013-11-08
Authors: M Essig; N Anzalone; S E Combs; À Dörfler; S-K Lee; P Picozzi; A Rovira; M Weller; M Law Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Paul T P W Burgers; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Joost Verhelst; Imro Dawson; Piet A R de Rijcke Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: L A Beaupre; J G Cinats; A Senthilselvan; D Lier; C A Jones; A Scharfenberger; D W C Johnston; L D Saunders Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2006-10
Authors: Katrine A Nielsen; Niels C Jensen; Claus M Jensen; Marianne Thomsen; Lars Pedersen; Søren P Johnsen; Annette Ingeman; Paul D Bartels; Reimar W Thomsen Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-10-12 Impact factor: 2.655