INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Shortened perineal body (PB) is associated with an increased risk of ultrasound-detected obstetric anal sphincter tear. The objective was to determine if shortened perineal body length (<3 cm) is a risk factor for ultrasound-detected anal sphincter tear at first delivery. METHODS: Pregnant nulliparous women were recruited over 18 months. At 35-37 weeks' gestation and 6 weeks' postpartum perineal body length (PB) was measured and subjects completed quality of life questionnaires. Primary outcome was ultrasound-diagnosed anal sphincter tear at 6 weeks postpartum. Secondary outcomes were also assessed. A priori power analysis determined that 70 subjects were needed to detect a difference in anal sphincter tear based on a PB cut-off of 3 cm. RESULTS: Seventy-three subjects completed the study. Mode of delivery was 69.9% spontaneous vaginal, 15.1% operative vaginal, and 15.1% labored cesarean. There were 25 anal sphincter abnormalities (34.2%) seen on ultrasound: 11 (15.1%) internal or external sphincter tears, 3 (4.1%) internal sphincter atrophy, 6 (8.2%) external sphincter thinning, and 7 (9.6%) external sphincter scarring. Only the 11 sphincter tears qualified as abnormal for the primary outcome. In the vaginal delivery group 16.4% (10 out of 61) had a sphincter tear, compared with 8.3% (1 out of 12) in the labored cesarean group (p = 0.68). Women with PB < 3 had a significantly higher rate of ultrasound-diagnosed anal sphincter tear (40.0% vs 11.1%, p = 0.038). When comparing women with and without sphincter tear, there was a significant difference in mean antepartum PB (3.1 vs 3.7 cm, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: A shortened perineal body length in primiparous women is associated with an increased risk of anal sphincter tear at the time of first delivery.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Shortened perineal body (PB) is associated with an increased risk of ultrasound-detected obstetric anal sphincter tear. The objective was to determine if shortened perineal body length (<3 cm) is a risk factor for ultrasound-detected anal sphincter tear at first delivery. METHODS: Pregnant nulliparous women were recruited over 18 months. At 35-37 weeks' gestation and 6 weeks' postpartum perineal body length (PB) was measured and subjects completed quality of life questionnaires. Primary outcome was ultrasound-diagnosed anal sphincter tear at 6 weeks postpartum. Secondary outcomes were also assessed. A priori power analysis determined that 70 subjects were needed to detect a difference in anal sphincter tear based on a PB cut-off of 3 cm. RESULTS: Seventy-three subjects completed the study. Mode of delivery was 69.9% spontaneous vaginal, 15.1% operative vaginal, and 15.1% labored cesarean. There were 25 anal sphincter abnormalities (34.2%) seen on ultrasound: 11 (15.1%) internal or external sphincter tears, 3 (4.1%) internal sphincter atrophy, 6 (8.2%) external sphincter thinning, and 7 (9.6%) external sphincter scarring. Only the 11 sphincter tears qualified as abnormal for the primary outcome. In the vaginal delivery group 16.4% (10 out of 61) had a sphincter tear, compared with 8.3% (1 out of 12) in the labored cesarean group (p = 0.68). Women with PB < 3 had a significantly higher rate of ultrasound-diagnosed anal sphincter tear (40.0% vs 11.1%, p = 0.038). When comparing women with and without sphincter tear, there was a significant difference in mean antepartum PB (3.1 vs 3.7 cm, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: A shortened perineal body length in primiparous women is associated with an increased risk of anal sphincter tear at the time of first delivery.
Authors: R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Catherine M Nichols; Marie Nam; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Elizabeth H Lamb; Nancy Currie Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-03-31 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Nadia Rahman; Latha Vinayakarao; Sangeeta Pathak; Dawn Minden; Louise Melson; Ella Vitue; A Pradhan Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca G Rogers; Gena C Dunivan; Jill K Alldredge; Clifford Qualls; Laura Migliaccio; Lawrence Leeman Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-02-13 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Luis C Moya-Jiménez; María L Sánchez-Ferrer; Evdochia Adoamnei; Jaime Mendiola Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Lea Tami Suzuki Zuchelo; Italla Maria Pinheiro Bezerra; Adna Thaysa Marcial Da Silva; Jéssica Menezes Gomes; José Maria Soares Júnior; Edmund Chada Baracat; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Isabel Cristina Esposito Sorpreso Journal: Int J Womens Health Date: 2018-08-08