Literature DB >> 24337405

Precise and rapid costal cartilage graft sectioning using a novel device: clinical application.

Allen Foulad1, Ashley Hamamoto2, Cyrus Manuel2, Brian J Wong3.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE The use of costal cartilage as a graft in facial reconstructive surgery requires sectioning the cartilage into a suitable shape. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the accuracy of a novel mechanical device for producing uniform slices of costal cartilage and to illustrate the use of the device during nasal surgery. DESIGN Basic and clinical study using 100 porcine ex vivo costal cartilage slices and 9 operative cases. METHODS This instrument departs from antecedent devices in that it uses compression to secure and stabilize the specimen during sectioning. A total of 75 porcine costal cartilage ribs were clamped with minimal compression just sufficient to secure and stabilize the specimen while cutting. Slices having a length of 4 cm and width of 1 cm were obtained using the cartilage cutter at 3 thicknesses: 1 mm (n = 25), 2 mm (n = 25), and 3 mm (n = 25). The procedure was repeated for the 2-mm thick samples; however, the ribs in this group (n = 25) were clamped using the maximum amount of compression attainable by the device. Thickness was measured using a digital micrometer. Case presentations illustrate the use of the device in secondary and reconstructive rhinoplasty surgery. RESULTS All specimens were highly uniform in thickness on visual inspection and appeared to be adequate for clinical application. Sectioning was completed in several seconds without complication. In the porcine specimens sectioned using minimal compression, the percentage difference in thickness for each individual sample averaged 18%, 10%, and 11% for the 1-mm-, 2-mm-, and 3-mm-thick slices, respectively. Within the specimens sectioned using maximum compression, the percentage difference in thickness for each individual sample averaged 35% for the 2-mm-thick slices. In the setting of nasal reconstructive surgery, slices having a thickness from 1 to 2 mm were found to be well suited for all necessary graft types. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The simple mechanical device described produces costal cartilage graft slices with highly uniform thickness. Securing the rib by clamping during cutting reduces uniformity of the slices; however, the imperfections are minimal, and all sectioned grafts are adequate for clinical application. The device can be adjusted to produce slices of appropriate thickness for all nasal cartilage grafts. This device is valuable for reconstructive procedures owing to its ease of use, rapid operation, and reproducible results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24337405      PMCID: PMC4127302          DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.2040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 2168-6076            Impact factor:   4.611


  7 in total

1.  Stabilization of costal cartilage graft warping using infrared laser irradiation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Allen Foulad; Pedram Ghasri; Rohit Garg; Brian Wong
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

2.  Analysis of the physical properties of costal cartilage in a porcine model.

Authors:  Manuel A Lopez; Anil R Shah; John G Westine; Kevin O'Grady; Dean M Toriumi
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

3.  Internal stabilization of autogenous rib cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty: a barrier to cartilage warping.

Authors:  J P Gunter; C P Clark; R M Friedman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Concentric and eccentric carved costal cartilage: a comparison of warping.

Authors:  David W Kim; Anil R Shah; Dean M Toriumi
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb

5.  Practical device for precise cutting of costal cartilage grafts to uniform thickness.

Authors:  Allen Foulad; Cyrus Manuel; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2011-02-21

6.  The porcine and lagomorph septal cartilages: models for tissue engineering and morphologic cartilage research.

Authors:  B J Wong; K K Chao; H K Kim; E A Chu; X Dao; M Gaon; C H Sun; J S Nelson
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

7.  Cartilage warping: an experimental model.

Authors:  S Harris; Y Pan; R Peterson; S Stal; M Spira
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.730

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Association Between the Thickness, Width, Initial Curvature, and Graft Origin of Costal Cartilage and Its Warping Characteristics.

Authors:  Amir A Hakimi; Allen Foulad; Kevin Ganesh; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.611

2.  Development and evaluation of rhinoplasty spreader graft suture simulator for novice surgeons.

Authors:  Connie J Oh; Prem B Tripathi; Jeffrey T Gu; Pamela Borden; Brian J-F Wong
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Modular Component Assembly Approach to Microtia Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jessica R Gandy; Bryan Lemieux; Allen Foulad; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.611

4.  Long-term in vivo electromechanical reshaping for auricular reconstruction in the New Zealand white rabbit model.

Authors:  Karam W Badran; Cyrus T Manuel; Anthony Chin Loy; Christian Conderman; Yuk Yee Yau; Jennifer Lin; Tjoson Tjoa; Erica Su; Dmitriy Protsenko; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Autologous costal chondral transplantation and costa-derived chondrocyte implantation: emerging surgical techniques.

Authors:  Youshui Gao; Junjie Gao; Hengyuan Li; Dajiang Du; Dongxu Jin; Minghao Zheng; Changqing Zhang
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.346

6.  Cerci-Adson-Brown Tissue Forceps: A New Design for Better Crafting the Grafts in Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Aret Çerçi Özkan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-09-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.