Literature DB >> 24337192

Efficacy of the double-pigtail stent as a conservative treatment for grade B pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatogastric anastomosis.

Eric Bartoli1, Lionel Rebibo, Brice Robert, Mathurin Fumery, Richard Delcenserie, Jean-Marc Regimbeau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in surgical techniques and postoperative care, morbidity associated with pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is still high. Grade B pancreatic fistula (PF) requires a specific combination of radiologically guided external drainage and medical support. This treatment is effective but requires prolonged hospitalization and maintenance of external drainage. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a double-pigtail stent (DPS) to treat grade B PF after PD with pancreatogastric anastomosis.
METHODS: Between January 2008 and October 2011, all patients who presented grade B PF after PD (n = 6) were included in the study. The PF was diagnosed according to the criteria of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. Endoscopic treatment was standardized with a DPS. The primary efficacy end point was the feasibility and efficacy of DPS placement. Secondary end points included data on the PF, the DPS placement procedure, and long-term outcome.
RESULTS: Endoscopic DPS placement was achieved in all patients with no complications. The median time to onset of PF after PD was 14 days. Closure of the external PF was obtained 7 days after the introduction of the DPS. The median time to external drain removal was 7 days after DPS placement, and the median time to oral refeeding was 7 days after DPS placement for all patients. The median time to DPS removal was 60 days. The median length of hospital stay after DPS placement was 10 days. During a median follow-up period of 21 months, there was no recurrence of PF after removal of the DPS.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment of grade B PF after PD appears to be effective and safe and is associated with shorter hospitalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24337192     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3347-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  32 in total

1.  Prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ronnie Tung Ping Poon; Siu Hung Lo; Daniel Fong; Sheung Tat Fan; John Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Patrick Pessaux; Alain Sauvanet; Christophe Mariette; François Paye; Fabrice Muscari; Antonio Sa Cunha; Bernard Sastre; Jean-Pierre Arnaud
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Preoperative pancreas CT/MRI characteristics predict fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  F Frozanpor; L Loizou; C Ansorge; R Segersvärd; L Lundell; N Albiin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Does external pancreatic duct stent decrease pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection?: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanming Zhou; Chunlian Yang; Shuangjia Wang; Jingxi Chen; Bin Li
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.996

5.  Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  John W Lin; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Taylor S Riall; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Endoscopic management of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic and other abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Olivier Le Moine; Celso Matos; Jean Closset; Jacques Devière
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.043

7.  A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Duffas; Bertrand Suc; Simon Msika; Gilles Fourtanier; Fabrice Muscari; Jean Marie Hay; Abe Fingerhut; Bertrand Millat; Alexandre Radovanowic; Pierre-Louis Fagniez
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the conservative treatment of choice.

Authors:  Luciana B P Haddad; Olivier Scatton; Bruto Randone; Wellington Andraus; Pierre-Philippe Massault; Bertrand Dousset; Olivier Soubrane
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Conservative management of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy.

Authors:  Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand; Alain Sauvanet; Alban Denys; Annie Sibert; Valérie Vilgrain; Jacques Belghiti
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  The safety of a pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients older than 80 years: risk vs. benefits.

Authors:  Marcovalerio Melis; Francesca Marcon; Antonio Masi; Antonio Pinna; Umut Sarpel; George Miller; Harvey Moore; Steven Cohen; Russell Berman; H Leon Pachter; Elliot Newman
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.647

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic Leaks and Fistulae: An Endoscopy-Oriented Classification.

Authors:  Massimiliano Mutignani; Stefanos Dokas; Alberto Tringali; Edoardo Forti; Francesco Pugliese; Marcello Cintolo; Raffaele Manta; Lorenzo Dioscoridi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Use of transanastomotic double-pigtail stents in the management of grade B colorectal leakage: a pilot feasibility study.

Authors:  Christelle Blot; Charles Sabbagh; Lionel Rebibo; Franck Brazier; Cyril Chivot; Mathurin Fumery; Jean-Marc Regimbeau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Diagnosis and management of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Giuseppe Malleo; Alessandra Pulvirenti; Giovanni Marchegiani; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 3.445

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.