Literature DB >> 24336733

Coarse-scale biases for spirals and orientation in human visual cortex.

Jeremy Freeman1, David J Heeger, Elisha P Merriam.   

Abstract

Multivariate decoding analyses are widely applied to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, but there is controversy over their interpretation. Orientation decoding in primary visual cortex (V1) reflects coarse-scale biases, including an over-representation of radial orientations. But fMRI responses to clockwise and counter-clockwise spirals can also be decoded. Because these stimuli are matched for radial orientation, while differing in local orientation, it has been argued that fine-scale columnar selectivity for orientation contributes to orientation decoding. We measured fMRI responses in human V1 to both oriented gratings and spirals. Responses to oriented gratings exhibited a complex topography, including a radial bias that was most pronounced in the peripheral representation, and a near-vertical bias that was most pronounced near the foveal representation. Responses to clockwise and counter-clockwise spirals also exhibited coarse-scale organization, at the scale of entire visual quadrants. The preference of each voxel for clockwise or counter-clockwise spirals was predicted from the preferences of that voxel for orientation and spatial position (i.e., within the retinotopic map). Our results demonstrate a bias for local stimulus orientation that has a coarse spatial scale, is robust across stimulus classes (spirals and gratings), and suffices to explain decoding from fMRI responses in V1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24336733      PMCID: PMC3858637          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0889-13.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  58 in total

1.  Orientation bias of neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  E L Smith; Y M Chino; W H Ridder; K Kitagawa; A Langston
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Spatial specificity of cerebral blood volume-weighted fMRI responses at columnar resolution.

Authors:  Fuqiang Zhao; Ping Wang; Kristy Hendrich; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Two retinotopic visual areas in human lateral occipital cortex.

Authors:  Jonas Larsson; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Estimating the influence of attention on population codes in human visual cortex using voxel-based tuning functions.

Authors:  John T Serences; Sameer Saproo; Miranda Scolari; Tiffany Ho; L Tugan Muftuler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Against hyperacuity in brain reading: spatial smoothing does not hurt multivariate fMRI analyses?

Authors:  Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Orientation bias of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  W R Levick; L N Thibos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-07-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Stimulus selectivity and spatial coherence of gamma components of the local field potential.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Jia; Matthew A Smith; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A continuous semantic space describes the representation of thousands of object and action categories across the human brain.

Authors:  Alexander G Huth; Shinji Nishimoto; An T Vu; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  The road to functional imaging and ultrahigh fields.

Authors:  Kâmil Uğurbil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  fMRI orientation decoding in V1 does not require global maps or globally coherent orientation stimuli.

Authors:  Arjen Alink; Alexandra Krugliak; Alexander Walther; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-12
View more
  25 in total

1.  Spatial scale and distribution of neurovascular signals underlying decoding of orientation and eye of origin from fMRI data.

Authors:  Jonas Larsson; Charlotte Harrison; Jade Jackson; Seung-Mock Oh; Vaida Zeringyte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Motion direction biases and decoding in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Helena X Wang; Elisha P Merriam; Jeremy Freeman; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Inverted Encoding Models of Human Population Response Conflate Noise and Neural Tuning Width.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Dylan Cable; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Representation of Auditory Motion Directions and Sound Source Locations in the Human Planum Temporale.

Authors:  Ceren Battal; Mohamed Rezk; Stefania Mattioni; Jyothirmayi Vadlamudi; Olivier Collignon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Dissociable signatures of visual salience and behavioral relevance across attentional priority maps in human cortex.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Vy A Vo; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Radial bias is not necessary for orientation decoding.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte; Jocelyn L Sy; Jascha D Swisher; Frank Tong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Attention alters orientation processing in the human lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Michael S Pratte; Frank Tong
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 8.  Persistent Activity During Working Memory From Front to Back.

Authors:  Clayton E Curtis; Thomas C Sprague
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.342

9.  Decoding Rich Spatial Information with High Temporal Resolution.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes; Michael J Wolff; Eelke Spaak
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Partitioning two components of BOLD activation suppression in flanker effects.

Authors:  Chien-Chung Chen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.