Literature DB >> 24336202

C/EBPα poises B cells for rapid reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells.

Bruno Di Stefano1, Jose Luis Sardina2, Chris van Oevelen2, Samuel Collombet3, Eric M Kallin4, Guillermo P Vicent1, Jun Lu5, Denis Thieffry3, Miguel Beato1, Thomas Graf6.   

Abstract

CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-α (C/EBPα) induces transdifferentiation of B cells into macrophages at high efficiencies and enhances reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells when co-expressed with the transcription factors Oct4 (Pou5f1), Sox2, Klf4 and Myc (hereafter called OSKM). However, how C/EBPα accomplishes these effects is unclear. Here we find that in mouse primary B cells transient C/EBPα expression followed by OSKM activation induces a 100-fold increase in iPS cell reprogramming efficiency, involving 95% of the population. During this conversion, pluripotency and epithelial-mesenchymal transition genes become markedly upregulated, and 60% of the cells express Oct4 within 2 days. C/EBPα acts as a 'path-breaker' as it transiently makes the chromatin of pluripotency genes more accessible to DNase I. C/EBPα also induces the expression of the dioxygenase Tet2 and promotes its translocation to the nucleus where it binds to regulatory regions of pluripotency genes that become demethylated after OSKM induction. In line with these findings, overexpression of Tet2 enhances OSKM-induced B-cell reprogramming. Because the enzyme is also required for efficient C/EBPα-induced immune cell conversion, our data indicate that Tet2 provides a mechanistic link between iPS cell reprogramming and B-cell transdifferentiation. The rapid iPS reprogramming approach described here should help to fully elucidate the process and has potential clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24336202     DOI: 10.1038/nature12885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  30 in total

1.  C/EBPα bypasses cell cycle-dependency during immune cell transdifferentiation.

Authors:  Alessandro Di Tullio; Thomas Graf
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Sequential introduction of reprogramming factors reveals a time-sensitive requirement for individual factors and a sequential EMT-MET mechanism for optimal reprogramming.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Liu; Hao Sun; Jing Qi; Linli Wang; Songwei He; Jing Liu; Chengqian Feng; Chunlan Chen; Wen Li; Yunqian Guo; Dajiang Qin; Guangjin Pan; Jiekai Chen; Duanqing Pei; Hui Zheng
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  GATA-1 reprograms avian myelomonocytic cell lines into eosinophils, thromboblasts, and erythroblasts.

Authors:  H Kulessa; J Frampton; T Graf
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBP(alpha))-induced transdifferentiation of pre-B cells into macrophages involves no overt retrodifferentiation.

Authors:  Alessandro Di Tullio; Thien Phong Vu Manh; Alexis Schubert; Giancarlo Castellano; Robert Månsson; Thomas Graf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Wdr5 mediates self-renewal and reprogramming via the embryonic stem cell core transcriptional network.

Authors:  Yen-Sin Ang; Su-Yi Tsai; Dung-Fang Lee; Jonathan Monk; Jie Su; Kajan Ratnakumar; Junjun Ding; Yongchao Ge; Henia Darr; Betty Chang; Jianlong Wang; Michael Rendl; Emily Bernstein; Christoph Schaniel; Ihor R Lemischka
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  A microRNA-based system for selecting and maintaining the pluripotent state in human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Bruno Di Stefano; Sara Martina Maffioletti; Bernhard Gentner; Federica Ungaro; Giulia Schira; Luigi Naldini; Vania Broccoli
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.277

7.  Replacement of Oct4 by Tet1 during iPSC induction reveals an important role of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in reprogramming.

Authors:  Yawei Gao; Jiayu Chen; Ke Li; Tong Wu; Bo Huang; Wenqiang Liu; Xiaochen Kou; Yu Zhang; Hua Huang; Yonghua Jiang; Chao Yao; Xiaolei Liu; Zhiwei Lu; Zijian Xu; Lan Kang; Jun Chen; Hailin Wang; Tao Cai; Shaorong Gao
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 24.633

8.  Early-stage epigenetic modification during somatic cell reprogramming by Parp1 and Tet2.

Authors:  Claudia A Doege; Keiichi Inoue; Toru Yamashita; David B Rhee; Skylar Travis; Ryousuke Fujita; Paolo Guarnieri; Govind Bhagat; William B Vanti; Alan Shih; Ross L Levine; Sara Nik; Emily I Chen; Asa Abeliovich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  The trophoblast as an integral component of a macrophage-cytokine network.

Authors:  L Guilbert; S A Robertson; T G Wegmann
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.126

10.  Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration.

Authors:  Jacob Hanna; Krishanu Saha; Bernardo Pando; Jeroen van Zon; Christopher J Lengner; Menno P Creyghton; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  94 in total

1.  Reprogramming human B cells into induced pluripotent stem cells and its enhancement by C/EBPα.

Authors:  C Bueno; J L Sardina; B Di Stefano; D Romero-Moya; A Muñoz-López; L Ariza; M C Chillón; A Balanzategui; J Castaño; A Herreros; M F Fraga; A Fernández; I Granada; O Quintana-Bustamante; J C Segovia; K Nishimura; M Ohtaka; M Nakanishi; T Graf; P Menendez
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Hormone-induced repression of genes requires BRG1-mediated H1.2 deposition at target promoters.

Authors:  Ana Silvina Nacht; Andy Pohl; Roser Zaurin; Daniel Soronellas; Javier Quilez; Priyanka Sharma; Roni H Wright; Miguel Beato; Guillermo P Vicent
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Structure of Nascent Chromatin Is Essential for Hematopoietic Lineage Specification.

Authors:  Svetlana Petruk; Samanta A Mariani; Marco De Dominici; Patrizia Porazzi; Valentina Minieri; Jingli Cai; Lorraine Iacovitti; Neal Flomenberg; Bruno Calabretta; Alexander Mazo
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  Whsc1 links pluripotency exit with mesendoderm specification.

Authors:  Tian V Tian; Bruno Di Stefano; Grégoire Stik; Maria Vila-Casadesús; José Luis Sardina; Enrique Vidal; Alessandro Dasti; Carolina Segura-Morales; Luisa De Andrés-Aguayo; Antonio Gómez; Johanna Goldmann; Rudolf Jaenisch; Thomas Graf
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 5.  Chromatin accessibility dynamics during cell fate reprogramming.

Authors:  Dongwei Li; Xiaodong Shu; Ping Zhu; Duanqing Pei
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Rapid Chromatin Switch in the Direct Reprogramming of Fibroblasts to Neurons.

Authors:  Orly L Wapinski; Qian Yi Lee; Albert C Chen; Rui Li; M Ryan Corces; Cheen Euong Ang; Barbara Treutlein; Chaomei Xiang; Valérie Baubet; Fabian Patrik Suchy; Venkat Sankar; Sopheak Sim; Stephen R Quake; Nadia Dahmane; Marius Wernig; Howard Y Chang
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Autophagy and mTORC1 regulate the stochastic phase of somatic cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Yasong Wu; Yuan Li; Hui Zhang; Yinghua Huang; Ping Zhao; Yujia Tang; Xiaohui Qiu; Yue Ying; Wen Li; Su Ni; Meng Zhang; Longqi Liu; Yan Xu; Qiang Zhuang; Zhiwei Luo; Christina Benda; Hong Song; Baohua Liu; Liangxue Lai; Xingguo Liu; Hung-Fat Tse; Xichen Bao; Wai-Yee Chan; Miguel A Esteban; Baoming Qin; Duanqing Pei
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 8.  Epigenetic control of myeloid cell differentiation, identity and function.

Authors:  Damiana Álvarez-Errico; Roser Vento-Tormo; Michael Sieweke; Esteban Ballestar
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 53.106

9.  Stem cells: The black box of reprogramming.

Authors:  David Cyranoski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Cellular reprogramming dynamics follow a simple 1D reaction coordinate.

Authors:  Sai Teja Pusuluri; Alex H Lang; Pankaj Mehta; Horacio E Castillo
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.