Literature DB >> 24335106

Early molecular response predicts outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with frontline nilotinib or imatinib.

Timothy P Hughes1, Giuseppe Saglio, Hagop M Kantarjian, François Guilhot, Dietger Niederwieser, Gianantonio Rosti, Chiaki Nakaseko, Carmino Antonio De Souza, Matt E Kalaycio, Stephan Meier, Xiaolin Fan, Hans D Menssen, Richard A Larson, Andreas Hochhaus.   

Abstract

We explored the impact of early molecular response (EMR; BCR-ABL ≤10% on the international scale [BCR-ABL(IS)] at 3 or 6 months) on outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with nilotinib or imatinib based on 4 years of follow up in Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials-Newly Diagnosed Patients. Patients (n = 846) received nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, or imatinib 400 mg once daily. At 3 months, more patients had EMR failure (ie, BCR-ABL(IS) >10%) on imatinib (33%) than on nilotinib (9%-11%); similarly at 6 months, 16% of patients in the imatinib arm vs 3% and 7% in the nilotinib arms had EMR failure. In all arms, EMR failure was associated with lower rates of molecular response, an increased risk of progression, and lower overall survival compared with EMR achievement. We also analyzed patient and treatment characteristics associated with EMR and found distinct patterns in the nilotinib arms vs the imatinib arm. High Sokal risk score was associated with a high rate of EMR failure on imatinib, but not on nilotinib. In contrast, reduced dose intensity and dose interruptions were strongly associated with EMR failure in nilotinib-treated, but not imatinib-treated, patients. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00471497.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24335106      PMCID: PMC4624459          DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-510396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  17 in total

1.  Early molecular and cytogenetic response is predictive for long-term progression-free and overall survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

Authors:  B Hanfstein; M C Müller; R Hehlmann; P Erben; M Lauseker; A Fabarius; S Schnittger; C Haferlach; G Göhring; U Proetel; H-J Kolb; S W Krause; W-K Hofmann; J Schubert; H Einsele; J Dengler; M Hänel; C Falge; L Kanz; A Neubauer; M Kneba; F Stegelmann; M Pfreundschuh; C F Waller; S Branford; T P Hughes; K Spiekermann; G M Baerlocher; M Pfirrmann; J Hasford; S Saußele; A Hochhaus
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Combining BCR-ABL1 transcript levels at 3 and 6 months in chronic myeloid leukemia: implications for early intervention strategies.

Authors:  Pratap Neelakantan; Gareth Gerrard; Claire Lucas; Dragana Milojkovic; Philippa May; Lihui Wang; Christos Paliompeis; Marco Bua; Alistair Reid; Katayoun Rezvani; Stephen O'Brien; Richard Clark; John Goldman; David Marin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Predictive value of early molecular response in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with first-line dasatinib.

Authors:  David Marin; Corinne Hedgley; Richard E Clark; Jane Apperley; Letizia Foroni; Dragana Milojkovic; Christopher Pocock; John M Goldman; Stephen O'Brien
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Six-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for the first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  A Hochhaus; S G O'Brien; F Guilhot; B J Druker; S Branford; L Foroni; J M Goldman; M C Müller; J P Radich; M Rudoltz; M Mone; I Gathmann; T P Hughes; R A Larson
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Safety and efficacy of imatinib cessation for CML patients with stable undetectable minimal residual disease: results from the TWISTER study.

Authors:  David M Ross; Susan Branford; John F Seymour; Anthony P Schwarer; Christopher Arthur; David T Yeung; Phuong Dang; Jarrad M Goyne; Cassandra Slader; Robin J Filshie; Anthony K Mills; Junia V Melo; Deborah L White; Andrew P Grigg; Timothy P Hughes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Delayed achievement of cytogenetic and molecular response is associated with increased risk of progression among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in early chronic phase receiving high-dose or standard-dose imatinib therapy.

Authors:  Alfonso Quintás-Cardama; Hagop Kantarjian; Dan Jones; Jianqin Shan; Gautam Borthakur; Deborah Thomas; Steven Kornblau; Susan O'Brien; Jorge Cortes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Nilotinib versus imatinib for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase, Philadelphia chromosome-positive, chronic myeloid leukaemia: 24-month minimum follow-up of the phase 3 randomised ENESTnd trial.

Authors:  Hagop M Kantarjian; Andreas Hochhaus; Giuseppe Saglio; Carmino De Souza; Ian W Flinn; Leif Stenke; Yeow-Tee Goh; Gianantonio Rosti; Hirohisa Nakamae; Neil J Gallagher; Albert Hoenekopp; Rick E Blakesley; Richard A Larson; Timothy P Hughes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 8.  European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013.

Authors:  Michele Baccarani; Michael W Deininger; Gianantonio Rosti; Andreas Hochhaus; Simona Soverini; Jane F Apperley; Francisco Cervantes; Richard E Clark; Jorge E Cortes; François Guilhot; Henrik Hjorth-Hansen; Timothy P Hughes; Hagop M Kantarjian; Dong-Wook Kim; Richard A Larson; Jeffrey H Lipton; François-Xavier Mahon; Giovanni Martinelli; Jiri Mayer; Martin C Müller; Dietger Niederwieser; Fabrizio Pane; Jerald P Radich; Philippe Rousselot; Giuseppe Saglio; Susanne Saußele; Charles Schiffer; Richard Silver; Bengt Simonsson; Juan-Luis Steegmann; John M Goldman; Rüdiger Hehlmann
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Initial molecular response at 3 months may predict both response and event-free survival at 24 months in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with nilotinib.

Authors:  Susan Branford; Dong-Wook Kim; Simona Soverini; Ariful Haque; Yaping Shou; Richard C Woodman; Hagop M Kantarjian; Giovanni Martinelli; Jerald P Radich; Giuseppe Saglio; Andreas Hochhaus; Timothy P Hughes; Martin C Müller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Early responses predict better outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: results with four tyrosine kinase inhibitor modalities.

Authors:  Preetesh Jain; Hagop Kantarjian; Aziz Nazha; Susan O'Brien; Elias Jabbour; Carlos Guillermo Romo; Sherry Pierce; Marylou Cardenas-Turanzas; Srdan Verstovsek; Gautam Borthakur; Farhad Ravandi; Alfonso Quintás-Cardama; Jorge Cortes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  87 in total

1.  First-line imatinib vs second- and third-generation TKIs for chronic-phase CML: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Vener; Rita Banzi; Federico Ambrogi; Annalisa Ferrero; Giuseppe Saglio; Gabriella Pravettoni; Milena Sant
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-06-23

2.  Long-term response to imatinib is not affected by the initial dose in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: final update from the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Optimization and Selectivity (TOPS) study.

Authors:  Michele Baccarani; Brian J Druker; Susan Branford; Dong-Wook Kim; Fabrizio Pane; Lidia Mongay; Manisha Mone; Christine-Elke Ortmann; Hagop M Kantarjian; Jerald P Radich; Timothy P Hughes; Jorge E Cortes; François Guilhot
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Exploratory study on the impact of switching to nilotinib in 18 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase with suboptimal response to imatinib.

Authors:  Sikander Ailawadhi; Luke P Akard; Carole B Miller; Anand Jillella; Daniel J DeAngelo; Solveig G Ericson; Felice Lin; Ghulam Warsi; Jerald Radich
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2016-11-24

Review 4.  The argument for using imatinib in CML.

Authors:  Simone Claudiani; Jane F Apperley
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

5.  Molecular response in CML: where is the bar?

Authors:  Michele Baccarani; Simona Soverini
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Current status of ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors stop studies for chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Shinya Kimura
Journal:  Stem Cell Investig       Date:  2016-08-09

Review 7.  Re-defining Prognosis of Hematological Malignancies by Dynamic Response Assessment Methods: Lessons Learnt in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Hodgkin Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Arihant Jain; Ankur Jain; Pankaj Malhotra
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 0.900

8.  Gene expression signature that predicts early molecular response failure in chronic-phase CML patients on frontline imatinib.

Authors:  Chung H Kok; David T Yeung; Liu Lu; Dale B Watkins; Tamara M Leclercq; Phuong Dang; Verity A Saunders; John Reynolds; Deborah L White; Timothy P Hughes
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-05-28

Review 9.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in 2015.

Authors:  Philip A Thompson; Hagop M Kantarjian; Jorge E Cortes
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 10.  Chronic myeloid leukemia: reminiscences and dreams.

Authors:  Tariq I Mughal; Jerald P Radich; Michael W Deininger; Jane F Apperley; Timothy P Hughes; Christine J Harrison; Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini; Giuseppe Saglio; Jorge Cortes; George Q Daley
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 9.941

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.