Literature DB >> 23620574

Early responses predict better outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: results with four tyrosine kinase inhibitor modalities.

Preetesh Jain1, Hagop Kantarjian, Aziz Nazha, Susan O'Brien, Elias Jabbour, Carlos Guillermo Romo, Sherry Pierce, Marylou Cardenas-Turanzas, Srdan Verstovsek, Gautam Borthakur, Farhad Ravandi, Alfonso Quintás-Cardama, Jorge Cortes.   

Abstract

Early responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)-chronic phase (CP) are associated with improved outcome. We analyzed the impact of such a response on outcomes among patients treated with 4 TKI modalities as frontline therapy in CML-CP. A total of 483 patients who received 400 or 800 mg imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib were analyzed. The median follow-up was 72 mo. Landmark analysis at 3 mo by molecular response showed that the cumulative proportions of 3-y event-free survival (EFS) for 3-mo BCR-ABL levels was 95% for those with ≤1%, 98% for >1% to 10%, and 61% for those with >10% (P = .001). The corresponding values by cytogenetic responses were 97% if Ph+ = 0%, 89% if Ph+ = 1% to 35%, and 81% if Ph+ >35% (P = .001). Cytogenetic response at 3 mo significantly discriminated for 3-y overall survival (OS): 98%, 96%, and 92%, respectively (P = .01). In multivariate analysis, young patients, high Sokal index, and treatment with imatinib 400 significantly predicted for poor (>35%) cytogenetic response at 3 mo. Early responses are predictive for EFS and failure-free survival and to a lesser extent OS, regardless of the treatment modality, although therapies other than standard-dose imatinib result in higher rates of deep early responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23620574      PMCID: PMC3743466          DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-490128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  37 in total

1.  Adherence is the critical factor for achieving molecular responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who achieve complete cytogenetic responses on imatinib.

Authors:  David Marin; Alexandra Bazeos; Francois-Xavier Mahon; Lina Eliasson; Dragana Milojkovic; Marco Bua; Jane F Apperley; Richard Szydlo; Ritti Desai; Kasia Kozlowski; Christos Paliompeis; Victoria Latham; Letizia Foroni; Mathieu Molimard; Alistair Reid; Katy Rezvani; Hugues de Lavallade; Cristina Guallar; John Goldman; Jamshid S Khorashad
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Dasatinib induces complete hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in blast crisis.

Authors:  Jorge Cortes; Philippe Rousselot; Dong-Wook Kim; Ellen Ritchie; Nelson Hamerschlak; Steven Coutre; Andreas Hochhaus; Francois Guilhot; Giuseppe Saglio; Jane Apperley; Oliver Ottmann; Neil Shah; Philipp Erben; Susan Branford; Prasheen Agarwal; Ashwin Gollerkeri; Michele Baccarani
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  The early molecular response to imatinib predicts cytogenetic and clinical outcome in chronic myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Lihui Wang; Kevin Pearson; Julia E Ferguson; Richard E Clark
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of nonadherence to imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: the ADAGIO study.

Authors:  Lucien Noens; Marie-Anne van Lierde; Robrecht De Bock; Gregor Verhoef; Pierre Zachée; Zwi Berneman; Philippe Martiat; Philippe Mineur; Koen Van Eygen; Karen MacDonald; Sabina De Geest; Tara Albrecht; Ivo Abraham
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Part I: mechanisms of resistance to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Jane F Apperley
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Delayed achievement of cytogenetic and molecular response is associated with increased risk of progression among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in early chronic phase receiving high-dose or standard-dose imatinib therapy.

Authors:  Alfonso Quintás-Cardama; Hagop Kantarjian; Dan Jones; Jianqin Shan; Gautam Borthakur; Deborah Thomas; Steven Kornblau; Susan O'Brien; Jorge Cortes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  European LeukemiaNet criteria for failure or suboptimal response reliably identify patients with CML in early chronic phase treated with imatinib whose eventual outcome is poor.

Authors:  David Marin; Dragana Milojkovic; Eduardo Olavarria; Jamshid S Khorashad; Hugues de Lavallade; Alistair G Reid; Letizia Foroni; Katayoun Rezvani; Marco Bua; Francesco Dazzi; Jiri Pavlu; Matthias Klammer; Jaspal S Kaeda; John M Goldman; Jane F Apperley
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Stephen G O'Brien; François Guilhot; Richard A Larson; Insa Gathmann; Michele Baccarani; Francisco Cervantes; Jan J Cornelissen; Thomas Fischer; Andreas Hochhaus; Timothy Hughes; Klaus Lechner; Johan L Nielsen; Philippe Rousselot; Josy Reiffers; Giuseppe Saglio; John Shepherd; Bengt Simonsson; Alois Gratwohl; John M Goldman; Hagop Kantarjian; Kerry Taylor; Gregor Verhoef; Ann E Bolton; Renaud Capdeville; Brian J Druker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Giuseppe Saglio; Dong-Wook Kim; Surapol Issaragrisil; Philipp le Coutre; Gabriel Etienne; Clarisse Lobo; Ricardo Pasquini; Richard E Clark; Andreas Hochhaus; Timothy P Hughes; Neil Gallagher; Albert Hoenekopp; Mei Dong; Ariful Haque; Richard A Larson; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Responses to second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors are durable: an intention-to-treat analysis in chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Authors:  Dragana Milojkovic; Jane F Apperley; Gareth Gerrard; Amr R Ibrahim; Richard Szydlo; Marco Bua; Alistair Reid; Katayoun Rezvani; Letizia Foroni; John Goldman; David Marin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  50 in total

1.  Imatinib-treated chronic myeloid leukemia patients with discordant response between cytogenetic and molecular tests at 3 and 6 month time-points have a reduced probability of subsequent optimal response.

Authors:  Massimiliano Bonifacio; Gianni Binotto; Elena Maino; Elisabetta Calistri; Luciana Marin; Luigi Scaffidi; Luca Frison; Federico De Marchi; Mauro Krampera; Giampiero Semenzato; Renato Fanin; Achille Ambrosetti; Mario Tiribelli
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Molecular response in CML: where is the bar?

Authors:  Michele Baccarani; Simona Soverini
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  The EUTOS population-based registry: incidence and clinical characteristics of 2904 CML patients in 20 European Countries.

Authors:  V S Hoffmann; M Baccarani; J Hasford; D Lindoerfer; S Burgstaller; D Sertic; P Costeas; J Mayer; K Indrak; H Everaus; P Koskenvesa; J Guilhot; G Schubert-Fritschle; F Castagnetti; F Di Raimondo; S Lejniece; L Griskevicius; N Thielen; T Sacha; A Hellmann; A G Turkina; A Zaritskey; A Bogdanovic; Z Sninska; I Zupan; J-L Steegmann; B Simonsson; R E Clark; A Covelli; G Guidi; R Hehlmann
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 4.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in 2015.

Authors:  Philip A Thompson; Hagop M Kantarjian; Jorge E Cortes
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Ponatinib as first-line treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase: a phase 2 study.

Authors:  Preetesh Jain; Hagop Kantarjian; Elias Jabbour; Graciela Nogueras Gonzalez; Gautam Borthakur; Naveen Pemmaraju; Naval Daver; Evguenia Gachimova; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Steven Kornblau; Farhad Ravandi; Susan O'Brien; Jorge Cortes
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 18.959

6.  Clonal chromosomal abnormalities appearing in Philadelphia chromosome-negative metaphases during CML treatment.

Authors:  Ghayas C Issa; Hagop M Kantarjian; Graciela Nogueras Gonzalez; Gautam Borthakur; Guilin Tang; William Wierda; Koji Sasaki; Nicholas J Short; Farhad Ravandi; Tapan Kadia; Keyur Patel; Raja Luthra; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Mary Beth Rios; Sara Dellasala; Elias Jabbour; Jorge E Cortes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Selecting the best frontline treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Musa Yilmaz; Yasmin Abaza; Elias Jabbour
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.952

8.  Impact of BCR-ABL transcript type on outcome in patients with chronic-phase CML treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Preetesh Jain; Hagop Kantarjian; Keyur P Patel; Graciela Nogueras Gonzalez; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Rashmi Kanagal Shamanna; Koji Sasaki; Elias Jabbour; Carlos Guillermo Romo; Tapan M Kadia; Naveen Pemmaraju; Naval Daver; Gautam Borthakur; Zeev Estrov; Farhad Ravandi; Susan O'Brien; Jorge Cortes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  Molecular monitoring.

Authors:  Simona Soverini; Gianantonio Rosti; Michele Baccarani; Giovanni Martinelli
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.952

10.  Strength of Validation for Surrogate End Points Used in the US Food and Drug Administration's Approval of Oncology Drugs.

Authors:  Chul Kim; Vinay Prasad
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.