| Literature DB >> 24335104 |
George Mulligan1, David I Lichter, Alessandra Di Bacco, Stephen J Blakemore, Allison Berger, Erik Koenig, Hugues Bernard, William Trepicchio, Bin Li, Rachel Neuwirth, Nibedita Chattopadhyay, Joseph B Bolen, Andrew J Dorner, Helgi van de Velde, Deborah Ricci, Sundar Jagannath, James R Berenson, Paul G Richardson, Edward A Stadtmauer, Robert Z Orlowski, Sagar Lonial, Kenneth C Anderson, Pieter Sonneveld, Jesús F San Miguel, Dixie-Lee Esseltine, Matthew Schu.
Abstract
Various translocations and mutations have been identified in myeloma, and certain aberrations, such as t(4;14) and del17, are linked with disease prognosis. To investigate mutational prevalence in myeloma and associations between mutations and patient outcomes, we tested a panel of 41 known oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in tumor samples from 133 relapsed myeloma patients participating in phase 2 or 3 clinical trials of bortezomib. DNA mutations were identified in 14 genes. BRAF as well as RAS genes were mutated in a large proportion of cases (45.9%) and these mutations were mutually exclusive. New recurrent mutations were also identified, including in the PDGFRA and JAK3 genes. NRAS mutations were associated with a significantly lower response rate to single-agent bortezomib (7% vs 53% in patients with mutant vs wild-type NRAS, P = .00116, Bonferroni-corrected P = .016), as well as shorter time to progression in bortezomib-treated patients (P = .0058, Bonferroni-corrected P = .012). However, NRAS mutation did not impact outcome in patients treated with high-dose dexamethasone. KRAS mutation did not reduce sensitivity to bortezomib or dexamethasone. These findings identify a significant clinical impact of NRAS mutation in myeloma and demonstrate a clear example of functional differences between the KRAS and NRAS oncogenes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24335104 PMCID: PMC4123425 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-05-504340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113