BACKGROUND: Broadly expressed transcriptions factors (TFs) control tissue-specific programs of gene expression through interactions with local TF networks. A prime example is the circadian clock: although the conserved TFs CLOCK (CLK) and CYCLE (CYC) control a transcriptional circuit throughout animal bodies, rhythms in behavior and physiology are generated tissue specifically. Yet, how CLK and CYC determine tissue-specific clock programs has remained unclear. RESULTS: Here, we use a functional genomics approach to determine the cis-regulatory requirements for clock specificity. We first determine CLK and CYC genome-wide binding targets in heads and bodies by ChIP-seq and show that they have distinct DNA targets in the two tissue contexts. Computational dissection of CLK/CYC context-specific binding sites reveals sequence motifs for putative partner factors, which are predictive for individual binding sites. Among them, we show that the opa and GATA motifs, differentially enriched in head and body binding sites respectively, can be bound by OPA and SERPENT (SRP). They act synergistically with CLK/CYC in the Drosophila feedback loop, suggesting that they help to determine their direct targets and therefore orchestrate tissue-specific clock outputs. In addition, using in vivo transgenic assays, we validate that GATA motifs are required for proper tissue-specific gene expression in the adult fat body, midgut, and Malpighian tubules, revealing a cis-regulatory signature for enhancers of the peripheral circadian clock. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal how universal clock circuits can regulate tissue-specific rhythms and, more generally, provide insights into the mechanism by which universal TFs can be modulated to drive tissue-specific programs of gene expression.
BACKGROUND: Broadly expressed transcriptions factors (TFs) control tissue-specific programs of gene expression through interactions with local TF networks. A prime example is the circadian clock: although the conserved TFs CLOCK (CLK) and CYCLE (CYC) control a transcriptional circuit throughout animal bodies, rhythms in behavior and physiology are generated tissue specifically. Yet, how CLK and CYC determine tissue-specific clock programs has remained unclear. RESULTS: Here, we use a functional genomics approach to determine the cis-regulatory requirements for clock specificity. We first determine CLK and CYC genome-wide binding targets in heads and bodies by ChIP-seq and show that they have distinct DNA targets in the two tissue contexts. Computational dissection of CLK/CYC context-specific binding sites reveals sequence motifs for putative partner factors, which are predictive for individual binding sites. Among them, we show that the opa and GATA motifs, differentially enriched in head and body binding sites respectively, can be bound by OPA and SERPENT (SRP). They act synergistically with CLK/CYC in the Drosophila feedback loop, suggesting that they help to determine their direct targets and therefore orchestrate tissue-specific clock outputs. In addition, using in vivo transgenic assays, we validate that GATA motifs are required for proper tissue-specific gene expression in the adult fat body, midgut, and Malpighian tubules, revealing a cis-regulatory signature for enhancers of the peripheral circadian clock. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal how universal clock circuits can regulate tissue-specific rhythms and, more generally, provide insights into the mechanism by which universal TFs can be modulated to drive tissue-specific programs of gene expression.
Authors: Arttu Jolma; Yimeng Yin; Kazuhiro R Nitta; Kashyap Dave; Alexander Popov; Minna Taipale; Martin Enge; Teemu Kivioja; Ekaterina Morgunova; Jussi Taipale Journal: Nature Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Alicia V Zamudio; Alessandra Dall'Agnese; Jonathan E Henninger; John C Manteiga; Lena K Afeyan; Nancy M Hannett; Eliot L Coffey; Charles H Li; Ozgur Oksuz; Benjamin R Sabari; Ann Boija; Isaac A Klein; Susana W Hawken; Jan-Hendrik Spille; Tim-Michael Decker; Ibrahim I Cisse; Brian J Abraham; Tong I Lee; Dylan J Taatjes; Jurian Schuijers; Richard A Young Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Jiajia Li; Erin E Terry; Edith Fejer; Diana Gamba; Natalie Hartmann; Joseph Logsdon; Daniel Michalski; Lisa E Rois; Maria J Scuderi; Michael Kunst; Michael E Hughes Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 7.217