Literature DB >> 24332299

Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia.

Johannes Berkhof1, Johannes A Bogaards2, Erhan Demirel2, Mireia Diaz3, Monisha Sharma4, Jane J Kim4.   

Abstract

We studied the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention strategies in the Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia (CEECA) region. The cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV)16/18 vaccination of 12 year-old girls was calculated for 28 countries, under the assumption that vaccination prevents 70% of all cervical cancer cases and that cervical cancer and all-cause mortality rates are stable without vaccination. At three-dose vaccination costs of I$ 100 per vaccinated girl (currency 2005 international dollars), HPV16/18 vaccination was very cost-effective in 25 out of 28 countries using the country's gross domestic product (GDP) per capita as cost-effectiveness threshold (criterion by World Health Organization). A three-dose vaccination cost of I$ 100 is within the current range of vaccine costs in European immunization programs, and therefore our results indicate that HPV vaccination may be good value for money. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening combined with vaccination, we calibrated a published simulation model to HPV genotype data collected in Slovenia, Poland, and Georgia. The screening interval was varied at 3, 6, and 10 years starting at age 25 or 30 and ending at age 60. In Slovenia and Poland, combined vaccination and 10-yearly HPV (DNA) screening (vaccination coverage 70%, screening coverage per round 70%) was very cost-effective when the cost of three-dose vaccination was I$ 100 per vaccinated girl. More intensive screening was very cost-effective when the screening coverage per round was 30% or 50%. In Georgia, 10-yearly Pap screening was very cost-effective in unvaccinated women. Vaccination combined with 10-yearly HPV screening was likely to be cost-effective if the three-dose vaccination cost was I$ 50 per vaccinated girl. To conclude, cervical cancer prevention strategies utilizing both HPV16/18 vaccination and HPV screening are very cost-effective in countries with sufficient resources. In low-resource settings, low vaccine pricing is essential for strategies of combined vaccination and screening to be cost-effective. This article forms part of a regional report entitled "Comprehensive Control of HPV Infections and Related Diseases in the Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia Region" Vaccine Volume 31, Supplement 7, 2013. Updates of the progress in the field are presented in a separate monograph entitled "Comprehensive Control of HPV Infections and Related Diseases" Vaccine Volume 30, Supplement 5, 2012.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central Asia; Central Europe; Cost effectiveness; Eastern Europe; HPV; Mathematical model; Screening; Vaccination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24332299     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  8 in total

Review 1.  Modeling preventative strategies against human papillomavirus-related disease in developed countries.

Authors:  Karen Canfell; Harrell Chesson; Shalini L Kulasingam; Johannes Berkhof; Mireia Diaz; Jane J Kim
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 2.  REVIEWING TRANSFERABILITY IN ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS ORIGINATING FROM EASTERN EUROPE.

Authors:  Olena Mandrik; Saskia Knies; Zoltan Kalo; Johan L Severens
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of human papillomavirus vaccination in South Africa accounting for human immunodeficiency virus prevalence.

Authors:  Xiao Li; Martinus P Stander; Georges Van Kriekinge; Nadia Demarteau
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 4.  Challenges in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Modelling of HPV Vaccines in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Practice Recommendations.

Authors:  Obinna I Ekwunife; James F O'Mahony; Andreas Gerber Grote; Christoph Mosch; Tatjana Paeck; Stefan K Lhachimi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses for combinations of prevention strategies against human papillomavirus (HPV) infection: a general trend.

Authors:  Frédéric Gervais; Kyle Dunton; Yiling Jiang; Nathalie Largeron
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  A roadmap for a comprehensive control of cervical cancer in Poland: integration of available solutions into current practice in primary and secondary prevention.

Authors:  Andrzej Nowakowski; Marc Arbyn; Maryla H Turkot; Paulina Wieszczy; Kinga Miłosz; Michał F Kamiński; Joanna Didkowska; Mariusz Bidziński; Włodzimierz Olszewski; Mirosław Wielgoś; Maciej Krzakowski; Ernest Kuchar; Jan Walewski
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.164

7.  Potential health impact and cost-effectiveness of bivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in Afghanistan.

Authors:  Palwasha Anwari; Frédéric Debellut; Elisabeth Vodicka; Andrew Clark; Farhad Farewar; Zubiada A Zhwak; Dastagger Nazary; Clint Pecenka; D Scott LaMontagne; Najibullah Safi
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  HPV-FRAME: A consensus statement and quality framework for modelled evaluations of HPV-related cancer control.

Authors:  Karen Canfell; Jane J Kim; Shalini Kulasingam; Johannes Berkhof; Ruanne Barnabas; Johannes A Bogaards; Nicole Campos; Chloe Jennett; Monisha Sharma; Kate T Simms; Megan A Smith; Louiza S Velentzis; Marc Brisson; Mark Jit
Journal:  Papillomavirus Res       Date:  2019-09-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.