Literature DB >> 24332165

Exploring the role of receptor flexibility in structure-based drug discovery.

Ferran Feixas1, Steffen Lindert2, William Sinko2, J Andrew McCammon3.   

Abstract

The proper understanding of biomolecular recognition mechanisms that take place in a drug target is of paramount importance to improve the efficiency of drug discovery and development. The intrinsic dynamic character of proteins has a strong influence on biomolecular recognition mechanisms and models such as conformational selection have been widely used to account for this dynamic association process. However, conformational changes occurring in the receptor prior and upon association with other molecules are diverse and not obvious to predict when only a few structures of the receptor are available. In view of the prominent role of protein flexibility in ligand binding and its implications for drug discovery, it is of great interest to identify receptor conformations that play a major role in biomolecular recognition before starting rational drug design efforts. In this review, we discuss a number of recent advances in computer-aided drug discovery techniques that have been proposed to incorporate receptor flexibility into structure-based drug design. The allowance for receptor flexibility provided by computational techniques such as molecular dynamics simulations or enhanced sampling techniques helps to improve the accuracy of methods used to estimate binding affinities and, thus, such methods can contribute to the discovery of novel drug leads.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerated molecular dynamics; Allostery; Computer-aided drug design; Conformational selection; Molecular dynamics; Receptor flexibility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24332165      PMCID: PMC4459653          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2013.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys Chem        ISSN: 0301-4622            Impact factor:   2.352


  138 in total

Review 1.  Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function.

Authors:  C J Tsai; S Kumar; B Ma; R Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Collective protein dynamics in relation to function.

Authors:  H J Berendsen; S Hayward
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Converging free energy estimates: MM-PB(GB)SA studies on the protein-protein complex Ras-Raf.

Authors:  Holger Gohlke; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Conformational selection and induced fit mechanism underlie specificity in noncovalent interactions with ubiquitin.

Authors:  Tomasz Wlodarski; Bojan Zagrovic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Exploring protein flexibility: incorporating structural ensembles from crystal structures and simulation into virtual screening protocols.

Authors:  David J Osguthorpe; Woody Sherman; Arnold T Hagler
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  The dynamic structure of thrombin in solution.

Authors:  Brian Fuglestad; Paul M Gasper; Marco Tonelli; J Andrew McCammon; Phineus R L Markwick; Elizabeth A Komives
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Alchemical free energy methods for drug discovery: progress and challenges.

Authors:  John D Chodera; David L Mobley; Michael R Shirts; Richard W Dixon; Kim Branson; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  The dynamic process of β(2)-adrenergic receptor activation.

Authors:  Rie Nygaard; Yaozhong Zou; Ron O Dror; Thomas J Mildorf; Daniel H Arlow; Aashish Manglik; Albert C Pan; Corey W Liu; Juan José Fung; Michael P Bokoch; Foon Sun Thian; Tong Sun Kobilka; David E Shaw; Luciano Mueller; R Scott Prosser; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Efficient drug lead discovery and optimization.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 22.384

10.  An improved relaxed complex scheme for receptor flexibility in computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  Rommie E Amaro; Riccardo Baron; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  51 in total

Review 1.  RNA Structural Differentiation: Opportunities with Pattern Recognition.

Authors:  Christopher S Eubanks; Amanda E Hargrove
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Kinetic dissection of the pre-existing conformational equilibrium in the trypsin fold.

Authors:  Austin D Vogt; Pradipta Chakraborty; Enrico Di Cera
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  A benchmark driven guide to binding site comparison: An exhaustive evaluation using tailor-made data sets (ProSPECCTs).

Authors:  Christiane Ehrt; Tobias Brinkjost; Oliver Koch
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  EPSP synthase flexibility is determinant to its function: computational molecular dynamics and metadynamics studies.

Authors:  Luís Fernando Saraiva Macedo Timmers; Antônio M S Neto; Rinaldo W Montalvão; Luiz A Basso; Diógenes S Santos; Osmar Norberto de Souza
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  The effect of bisphenol A on testicular steroidogenesis and its amelioration by quercetin: an in vivo and in silico approach.

Authors:  Sanman Samova; Chirag N Patel; Hetal Doctor; Himanshu A Pandya; R J Verma
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.524

6.  Successful Identification of Cardiac Troponin Calcium Sensitizers Using a Combination of Virtual Screening and ROC Analysis of Known Troponin C Binders.

Authors:  Melanie L Aprahamian; Svetlana B Tikunova; Morgan V Price; Andres F Cuesta; Jonathan P Davis; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 7.  Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Tatiana Maximova; Ryan Moffatt; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Improving inverse docking target identification with Z-score selection.

Authors:  Stephanie S Kim; Melanie L Aprahamian; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.817

9.  Native State of Complement Protein C3d Analysed via Hydrogen Exchange and Conformational Sampling.

Authors:  Didier Devaurs; Malvina Papanastasiou; Dinler A Antunes; Jayvee R Abella; Mark Moll; Daniel Ricklin; John D Lambris; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  Int J Comput Biol Drug Des       Date:  2018-03-24

10.  An Interhelical Salt Bridge Controls Flexibility and Inhibitor Potency for Regulators of G-protein Signaling Proteins 4, 8, and 19.

Authors:  Vincent S Shaw; Mohammadjavad Mohammadi; Josiah A Quinn; Harish Vashisth; Richard R Neubig
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-09-22       Impact factor: 4.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.