Literature DB >> 24330432

Systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials comparing the effectiveness of transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical resection in the management of early rectal cancer.

M S Sajid1, S Farag, P Leung, P Sains, W F A Miles, M K Baig.   

Abstract

AIM: A systematic analysis was conducted of trials comparing the effectiveness of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) with radical resection (RR) for T1 and T2 rectal cancer.
METHOD: An electronic search was carried out of trials reporting the effectiveness of TEMS and RR in the treatment of T1 and T2 rectal cancers.
RESULTS: Ten trials including 942 patients were retrieved. There was a trend toward a higher risk of local recurrence (odds ratio 2.78; 95% confidence interval 1.42, 5.44; z = 2.97; P < 0.003) and overall recurrence (P < 0.01) following TEMS compared with RR. The risk of distant recurrence, overall survival (odds ratio 0.90; 95% confidence interval 0.49, 1.66; z = 0.33; P = 0.74) and mortality was similar. TEMS was associated with a shorter operation time and hospital stay and a reduced risk of postoperative complications (P < 0.0001). The included studies, however, were significantly diverse in stage and grade of rectal cancer and the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
CONCLUSION: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery appears to have clinically measurable advantages in patients with early rectal cancer. The studies included in this review do not allow firm conclusions as to whether TEMS is superior to RR in the management of early rectal cancer. Larger, better designed and executed prospective studies are needed to answer this question. Colorectal Disease
© 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominoperineal resection; anterior resection; lower rectal cancer; transanal endoscopic microsurgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24330432     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  21 in total

1.  Preoperative chemoradiotherapy affects postoperative outcomes and functional results in patients treated with transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplasms.

Authors:  G Rizzo; D P Pafundi; F Sionne; L D'Agostino; G Pietricola; M A Gambacorta; V Valentini; C Coco
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer: T1 and beyond? An evidence-based review.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Alberto Arezzo; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The evolution of cancer surgery and future perspectives.

Authors:  Lynda Wyld; Riccardo A Audisio; Graeme J Poston
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Rectal cancer confined to the bowel wall: the role of 3 Tesla phased-array MR imaging in T categorization.

Authors:  Hale Çolakoğlu Er; Elif Peker; Ayşe Erden; İlhan Erden; Ethem Geçim; Berna Savaş
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Colonoscopy Surveillance after Colorectal Cancer Resection: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas J Robertson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  HPV 16 E7 inhibits OSCC cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis by upregulating the expression of miR-20a.

Authors:  Jun Hu; Weili Ge; Junfeng Xu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-01-19

7.  Low rectal cancer: Sphincter preserving techniques-selection of patients, techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Nikoletta Dimitriou; Othon Michail; Dimitrios Moris; John Griniatsos
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-07-15

8.  Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEMS) for Rectal Cancer: Patient Decision-making, Postoperative Experience and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Alexandra Koreli; George Briassoulis; Michail Sideris; Anastas Philalithis; Savvas Papagrigoriadis
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 9.  Local excision by transanal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Luis J García-Flórez; Jorge L Otero-Díez
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project.

Authors:  Mauro Podda; Patricia Sylla; Gianluca Baiocchi; Michel Adamina; Vanni Agnoletti; Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Alberto Arezzo; Nicola Avenia; Walter Biffl; Antonio Biondi; Simona Bui; Fabio C Campanile; Paolo Carcoforo; Claudia Commisso; Antonio Crucitti; Nicola De'Angelis; Gian Luigi De'Angelis; Massimo De Filippo; Belinda De Simone; Salomone Di Saverio; Giorgio Ercolani; Gustavo P Fraga; Francesco Gabrielli; Federica Gaiani; Mario Guerrieri; Angelo Guttadauro; Yoram Kluger; Ari K Leppaniemi; Andrea Loffredo; Tiziana Meschi; Ernest E Moore; Monica Ortenzi; Francesco Pata; Dario Parini; Adolfo Pisanu; Gilberto Poggioli; Andrea Polistena; Alessandro Puzziello; Fabio Rondelli; Massimo Sartelli; Neil Smart; Michael E Sugrue; Patricia Tejedor; Marco Vacante; Federico Coccolini; Justin Davies; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.