Literature DB >> 24327236

Using the low-pass monogenic signal framework for cell/background classification on multiple cell lines in bright-field microscope images.

Firas Mualla1, Simon Schöll, Björn Sommerfeldt, Andreas Maier, Stefan Steidl, Rainer Buchholz, Joachim Hornegger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several cell detection approaches which deal with bright-field microscope images utilize defocusing to increase image contrast. The latter is related to the physical light phase through the transport of intensity equation (TIE). Recently, it was shown that it is possible to approximate the solution of the TIE using a low-pass monogenic signal framework. The purpose of this paper is to show that using the local phase of the aforementioned monogenic signal instead of the defocused image improves the cell/background classification accuracy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The paper statement was tested on an image database composed of three cell lines: adherent CHO, adherent L929, and Sf21 in suspension. Local phase and local energy images were generated using the low-pass monogenic signal framework with axial derivative images as input. Machine learning was then employed to investigate the discriminative power of the local phase. Three classifier models were utilized: random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) with a linear kernel, and SVM with a radial basis function (RBF) kernel.
RESULTS: The improvement, averaged over cell lines, of classifying 5×5 sized patches extracted from the local phase image instead of the defocused image was 7.3% using the RF, 11.6% using the linear SVM, and 10.2% when a RBF kernel was employed instead of the linear one. Furthermore, the feature images can be sorted by increasing discriminative power as follows: at-focus signal, local energy, defocused signal, local phase. The only exception to this order was the superiority of local energy over defocused signal for suspended cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Local phase computed using the low-pass monogenic signal framework considerably outperforms the defocused image for the purpose of pixel-patch cell/background classification in bright-field microscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24327236     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-013-0969-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  6 in total

1.  Cell surface fluctuations studied with defocusing microscopy.

Authors:  U Agero; C H Monken; C Ropert; R T Gazzinelli; O N Mesquita
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2003-05-07

2.  A new preprocessing approach for cell recognition.

Authors:  Xi Long; W Louis Cleveland; Y Lawrence Yao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2005-09

3.  Phase mutual information as a similarity measure for registration.

Authors:  Matthew Mellor; Michael Brady
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Automatic detection of unstained viable cells in bright field images using a support vector machine with an improved training procedure.

Authors:  Xi Long; W Louis Cleveland; Y Lawrence Yao
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  Automatic Cell Detection in Bright-Field Microscope Images Using SIFT, Random Forests, and Hierarchical Clustering.

Authors:  Firas Mualla; Simon Scholl; Bjorn Sommerfeldt; Andreas Maier; Joachim Hornegger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Artificial neural network-aided image analysis system for cell counting.

Authors:  P J Sjöström; B R Frydel; L U Wahlberg
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1999-05-01
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Medical image computing and image-based simulation: recent developments and advances in Germany.

Authors:  Heinz Handels; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Thomas M Deserno; Thomas Tolxdorff
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.924

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.