Literature DB >> 24327067

Empirical Correction to the Likelihood Ratio Statistic for Structural Equation Modeling with Many Variables.

Ke-Hai Yuan1, Yubin Tian, Hirokazu Yanagihara.   

Abstract

Survey data typically contain many variables. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is commonly used in analyzing such data. The most widely used statistic for evaluating the adequacy of a SEM model is T ML, a slight modification to the likelihood ratio statistic. Under normality assumption, T ML approximately follows a chi-square distribution when the number of observations (N) is large and the number of items or variables (p) is small. However, in practice, p can be rather large while N is always limited due to not having enough participants. Even with a relatively large N, empirical results show that T ML rejects the correct model too often when p is not too small. Various corrections to T ML have been proposed, but they are mostly heuristic. Following the principle of the Bartlett correction, this paper proposes an empirical approach to correct T ML so that the mean of the resulting statistic approximately equals the degrees of freedom of the nominal chi-square distribution. Results show that empirically corrected statistics follow the nominal chi-square distribution much more closely than previously proposed corrections to T ML, and they control type I errors reasonably well whenever N ≥ max(50,2p). The formulations of the empirically corrected statistics are further used to predict type I errors of T ML as reported in the literature, and they perform well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24327067     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-013-9386-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  10 in total

Review 1.  Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research.

Authors:  R C MacCallum; J T Austin
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Fitting structural equation models using estimating equations: a model segregation approach.

Authors:  Ke-Hai Yuan; Wai Chan
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  When fit indices and residuals are incompatible.

Authors:  Michael W Browne; Robert C MacCallum; Cheong-Tag Kim; Barbara L Andersen; Ronald Glaser
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-12

4.  Bootstrap approach to inference and power analysis based on three test statistics for covariance structure models.

Authors:  Ke-Hai Yuan; Kentaro Hayashi
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?

Authors:  L T Hu; P M Bentler; Y Kano
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Structural Equation Modeling with Small Samples: Test Statistics.

Authors:  P M Bentler; K H Yuan
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Fit Indices Versus Test Statistics.

Authors:  Ke-Hai Yuan
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  A general distribution theory for a class of likelihood criteria.

Authors:  G E P BOX
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 2.445

9.  Normal theory based test statistics in structural equation modelling.

Authors:  K H Yuan; P M Bentler
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.380

10.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices.

Authors:  Dexin Shi; Taehun Lee; Alberto Maydeu-Olivares
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Correcting Model Fit Criteria for Small Sample Latent Growth Models With Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Daniel McNeish; Jeffrey R Harring
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.821

3.  Using the Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMR) to Assess Exact Fit in Structural Equation Models.

Authors:  Goran Pavlov; Alberto Maydeu-Olivares; Dexin Shi
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Structural Equation Modeling With Many Variables: A Systematic Review of Issues and Developments.

Authors:  Lifang Deng; Miao Yang; Katerina M Marcoulides
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.