Literature DB >> 24326004

Effect of glargine insulin delivery method (pen device versus vial/syringe) on glycemic control and patient preferences in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Stacey A Seggelke1, R Matthew Hawkins1, Joanna Gibbs1, Neda Rasouli1, Cecilia C Low Wang1, Boris Draznin1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of two different glargine insulin delivery methods (pen device vs. vial/syringe) on glycemic control and patient preferences in a randomized, open-label, crossover, comparative effectiveness study.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients discharged from the hospital were recruited for this study. In the hospital, all patients were treated with a basal-bolus insulin regimen. Upon discharge, 21 patients received glargine by pen device for 3 months and were then switched to vial/syringe for the next 3 months (group 1). Group 2 consisted of 10 patients discharged on vial/syringe and converted to pen device after 3 months. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was measured at enrollment and at 3 and 6 months. A questionnaire assessing patient preference was administered at 3 and 6 months.
RESULTS: Groups 1 and 2 had similar baseline HbA1c (10.7 ± 2.2% and 11.2 ± 2.5%, respectively) and similar reduction in HbA1c at 3 months (7.8 ± 1.7% and 7.3 ± 1.4%, respectively; P<.001 vs. baseline). However, after crossover, the changes in HbA1c from 3 to 6 months were significantly different between groups. HbA1c increased to 8.5 ± 2.0% at 6 months in group 1 after switching to the vial/syringe but remained unchanged (7.1 ± 1.6%) in group 2 after switching to a pen device (P<.01, group 1 vs. group 2). Patient questionnaires after each phase of the trial revealed that patients found the pen device more convenient and were more likely to recommend this insulin delivery method to someone else.
CONCLUSION: Patients switching to a glargine pen device achieved lower HbA1c at the 6-month follow-up. Patients in both groups overwhelmingly preferred glargine pens over vials/syringes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24326004     DOI: 10.4158/EP13404.OR

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Pract        ISSN: 1530-891X            Impact factor:   3.443


  6 in total

Review 1.  Use of technology when assessing adherence to diabetes self-management behaviors.

Authors:  Kimberly A Driscoll; Deborah Young-Hyman
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Pen Devices for Insulin Self-Administration Compared With Needle and Vial: Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pieralessandro Lasalvia; Julián Esteban Barahona-Correa; Diana Marcela Romero-Alvernia; Sebastián Gil-Tamayo; Camilo Castañeda-Cardona; Juan Gabriel Bayona; Juan José Triana; Andrés Felipe Laserna; Miguel Mejía-Torres; Paula Restrepo-Jimenez; Juliana Jimenez-Zapata; Diego Rosselli
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-28

3.  Analysis of "Laboratory and Benchtop Performance of a Mealtime Insulin Delivery System".

Authors:  Eric Zijlstra
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-04-05

4.  Impact of Injection Speed, Volume, and Site on Pain Sensation.

Authors:  Eric Zijlstra; Johannes Jahnke; Annelie Fischer; Christoph Kapitza; Thomas Forst
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-10-08

5.  Accuracy and Injection Force of the Gla-300 Injection Device Compared With Other Commercialized Disposable Insulin Pens.

Authors:  David Klonoff; Irina Nayberg; Marissa Thonius; Florian See; Mona Abdel-Tawab; Frank Erbstein; Thomas Haak
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-26

6.  Analysis of a Delivery Device Conversion for Insulin Aspart: Potential Clinical Impact in Veterans.

Authors:  Caitlin M Moorman Spangler; Beth D Greck; Jancy H Killian
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2016-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.