Literature DB >> 24325541

Comparative pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of tylosin tartrate and tylosin phosphate after a single oral and i.v. administration in chickens.

L-W Ji1, L-L Dong, H Ji, X-W Feng, D Li, R-L Ding, S-X Jiang.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability of tylosin tartrate and tylosin phosphate were carried out in broiler chickens according to a principle of single dose, random, parallel design. The two formulations of tylosin were given orally and intravenously at a dose level of 10 mg/kg b.w to chicken after an overnight fasting (n = 10 chickens/group). Serial blood samples were collected at different time points up to 24 h postdrug administration. A high performance liquid chromatography method was used for the determination of tylosin concentrations in chicken plasma. The tylosin plasma concentration's time plot of each chicken was analyzed by the 3P97 software. The pharmacokinetics of tylosin was best described by a one-compartmental open model 1st absorption after oral administration. After intravenous administration the pharmacokinetics of tylosin was best described by a two-compartmental open model, and there were no significant differences between tylosin tartrate and tylosin phosphate. After oral administration, there were significant differences in the Cmax (0.18 ± 0.01, 0.44 ± 0.09) and AUC (0.82 ± 0.05, 1.57 ± 0.25)between tylosin phosphate and tylosin tartrate. The calculated oral bioavailability (F) of tylosin tartrate and tylosin phosphate were 25.78% and 13.73%, respectively. Above all, we can reasonably conclude that, the absorption of tylosin tartrate is better than tylosin phosphate after oral administration.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24325541     DOI: 10.1111/jvp.12092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0140-7783            Impact factor:   1.786


  6 in total

1.  Allometric analysis of tylosin tartrate pharmacokinetics in growing male turkeys.

Authors:  Błażej Poźniak; Marta Tikhomirov; Karolina Motykiewicz-Pers; Kamila Bobrek; Marcin Świtała
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.672

2.  Pharmacokinetics of Tylvalosin in Broiler Turkeys (Meleagris Gallopavo) After Single Intravenous and Oral Administration.

Authors:  Mohamed Elbadawy; Mohamed Aboubakr; Amira Abugomaa
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-10-17

3.  Modeling the Effect of Tylosin Phosphate on Macrolide-Resistant Enterococci in Feedlots and Reducing Resistance Transmission.

Authors:  Gregory Sean Stapleton; Casey L Cazer; Yrjö T Gröhn
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.171

4.  Ocular and uteroplacental pathology in a macaque pregnancy with congenital Zika virus infection.

Authors:  Emma L Mohr; Lindsey N Block; Christina M Newman; Laurel M Stewart; Michelle Koenig; Matthew Semler; Meghan E Breitbach; Leandro B C Teixeira; Xiankun Zeng; Andrea M Weiler; Gabrielle L Barry; Troy H Thoong; Gregory J Wiepz; Dawn M Dudley; Heather A Simmons; Andres Mejia; Terry K Morgan; M Shahriar Salamat; Sarah Kohn; Kathleen M Antony; Matthew T Aliota; Mariel S Mohns; Jennifer M Hayes; Nancy Schultz-Darken; Michele L Schotzko; Eric Peterson; Saverio Capuano; Jorge E Osorio; Shelby L O'Connor; Thomas C Friedrich; David H O'Connor; Thaddeus G Golos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Quick Multi-Class Determination of Residues of Antimicrobial Veterinary Drugs in Animal Muscle by LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Meiyu Zhang; Erfen Li; Yijuan Su; Yingxia Zhang; Jingmeng Xie; Limin He
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of tylosin against Streptococcus suis in pigs.

Authors:  Lingli Huang; Haiyang Zhang; Mei Li; Ijaz Ahmad; Yulian Wang; Zonghui Yuan
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.741

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.