Literature DB >> 2432548

Survival and mortality in 3,701 pacemaker patients: arguments in favor of pacemaker reuse.

J Mugica, R Duconge, L Henry.   

Abstract

This study analyzed the results of 3,701 patients implanted with cardiac pacemakers at the Centre Chirurgical du Val d'Or between 1976 and 1981. Two pacemaker populations were compared: those having a new pacemaker and those implanted with a reused pacemaker. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups, either in terms of indications for implantation or in terms of actuarial survival of patients. In addition, there was no significant change in survival of the pulse generator. The reutilization of pacemakers appeared to be in no way detrimental to patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2432548     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1986.tb06709.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

1.  Medical devices labelled for single use: the reuse of permanent cardiac pacemakers.

Authors:  M Rosengarten
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Reuse of pacemakers, defibrillators and cardiac resynchronisation devices.

Authors:  Raja J Selvaraj; R Sakthivel; Santhosh Satheesh; Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai; Pascal Sagnol; Xavier Jouven; Bernard Dodinot; Jayaraman Balachander
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2017-01-23

3.  Societal views of pacemaker reutilization for those with untreated symptomatic bradycardia in underserved nations.

Authors:  Lindsey Gakenheimer; Dave C Lange; Joshua Romero; James N Kirkpatrick; Patricia Sovitch; Hakan Oral; Kim A Eagle; Timir S Baman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Reuse of infected cardiac rhythm management devices in the same individual.

Authors:  Duan Jiangbo; Li Xuebin; Zhang Ping; Wang Long; Li Ding; Chu Xianming; Ze Feng; Fang Yong; Yuan Cuizhen; Guo Jihong
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Re-use of explanted DDD pacemakers as VDD- clinical utility and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  K K N Namboodiri; Y P Sharma; H K Bali; A Grover
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2004-01-01

6.  Performance of re-used pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators compared with new devices at Groote Schuur Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors:  Zimasa V Jama; Ashley Chin; Motasim Badri; Bongani M Mayosi
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.167

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.