| Literature DB >> 24324666 |
Henrik Friis1, Nyagosya Range, John Changalucha, George Praygod, Kidola Jeremiah, Daniel Faurholt-Jepsen, Henrik Krarup, Christian Mølgaard, Åse Bengaard Andersen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about vitamin D status in low-income populations burdened with infectious diseases. Hence, there is a need for data on correlates of serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (S-25(OH)D) and its validity during infections.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24324666 PMCID: PMC3855700 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Mean serum 25(OH)D among 355 neighbourhood controls (NHc) and 1250 pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients at the year and quarter (Q) of examination.
Two cases from first quarter of 2006 and seven from 2009 not shown.
Serum 25(OH)D in 1250 pulmonary TB patients and 355 neighbourhood controls by categories of sex, age, body mass index, pulmonary TB and HIV status and elevated acute phase reactants1.
| % (n) | Mean | 95% CI | P | |
| Sex | 0.18 | |||
| Females | 41.9 (657) | 103.6 | 100.9; 106.3 | |
| Males | 58.1 (912) | 106.0 | 104.7; 108.8 | |
| Age (y) | <0.001 | |||
| <25 | 22.2 (349) | 99.0 | 95.5; 102.5 | |
| 25–35 | 33.6 (527) | 106.3 | 103.4; 109.2 | |
| 35–45 | 24.0 (377) | 107.4 | 103.5; 111.4 | |
| 45–55 | 12.2 (192) | 110.5 | 105.3; 115.6 | |
| 55+ | 7.9 (124) | 101.0 | 95.3; 106.8 | |
| Pulmonary TB status | <0.001 | |||
| Non-TB control | 22.1 (346) | 84.4 | 81.7; 87.1 | |
| PTB− | 26.4 (414) | 111.8 | 108.2; 115.4 | |
| PTB+ | 51.6 (809) | 110.4 | 108.0; 112.8 | |
| HIV and ART status | <0.001 | |||
| HIV− | 58.8 (923) | 98.4 | 96.2; 100.6 | |
| HIV+/ART-naïve | 36.1 (567) | 115.6 | 112.7; 118.5 | |
| HIV+/on ART | 5.0 (79) | 107.6 | 100.2; 114.3 | |
| Body mass indexpercentile | <0.0001 | |||
| <25 | 41.7 (653) | 108.7 | 106.4; 111.0 | |
| 25–50 | 51.5 (806) | 103.4 | 99.1; 107.6 | |
| 50+ | 6.8 (107) | 95.9 | 92.6; 99.2 | |
| Serum C-reactive protein(mg/L) | <0.001 | |||
| ≤2 | 19.2 (300) | 87.7 | 84.1; 91.4 | |
| 2–5 | 7.4 (115) | 98.6 | 93.3; 103.8 | |
| 5–10 | 5.9 (92) | 105.4 | 96.9; 113.9 | |
| 10–50 | 18.5 (289) | 109.5 | 105.2; 113.7 | |
| 50+ | 49.1 (767) | 110.8 | 108.4; 113.2 | |
| Serum α1-acid glycoprotein(mg/L) | <0.001 | |||
| ≤1 | 25.0 (391) | 86.8 | 84.0; 89.7 | |
| 1–2 | 20.2 (317) | 109.1 | 105.0; 113.2 | |
| 2–3 | 38.1 (596) | 111.1 | 108.4; 113.9 | |
| 3+ | 16.8 (263) | 113.1 | 108.8; 117.4 |
Pulmonary TB status was based on culture, except where culture data were not available. For 355 consecutively recruited sputum positive TB patients a control was randomly selected among individuals with same sex and age from the neighbourhood. Serum 25(OH)D data were available on 1570, but n may sum up to less, due to missing data.
Based on sex-specific percentiles among the neighbourhood controls.
Correlates of serum 25(OH)D in 1250 pulmonary TB patients and 355 neighbourhood with regression coefficient B, 95% confidence interval (CI) and P-values1.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
| B | 95% CI | P | B | 95% CI | P | |
| Sex | ||||||
| Female | −13.8 | −21.9; −8.2 | <0.0001 | −13.6 | −20.4; −6.9 | <0.0001 |
| Male | – | – | ||||
| PTB status | ||||||
| PTB among females | 24.8 | 18.6; 30.9 | <0.0001 | 16.4 | 8.8; 24.0 | <0.0001 |
| PTB among males | 9.8 | 4.5; 15.2 | <0.0001 | −0.7 | −8.0; 6.6 | 0.83 |
| Non-TB control | – | |||||
| HIV status | ||||||
| HIV+/ART-naïve | 9.6 | 6.0; 13.2 | <0.0001 | 8.9 | 5.2; 12.5 | <0.0001 |
| HIV+/on ART | 1.0 | −6.6; 8.6 | 0.80 | |||
| HIV− | – | – | ||||
| Serum α1-acid glycoprotein (mg/L) | ||||||
| <1 | – | |||||
| 1–2 | 11.8 | 5.5; 18.1 | <0.0001 | |||
| 2–3 | 11.6 | 5.2; 18.0 | <0.0001 | |||
| 3+ | 12.7 | 5.7; 19.7 | <0.0001 | |||
Pulmonary TB status was based on culture, except where culture data were not available. For 355 consecutively recruited sputum positive TB patients a control was randomly selected among individuals with same sex and age from the neighbourhood. Age, and quarter and year of recruitment were adjusted for in both models.
Model 1: N = 1540, adjusted R2 = 0.206 and intercept = 112.1 (95% CI: 105.1; 119.2).
Model 2: N = 1537, adjusted R2 = 0.212 and intercept = 110.4 (95% CI: 103.3; 117.5).