Literature DB >> 19257399

Evolutionary model of species body mass diversification.

A Clauset1, S Redner.   

Abstract

We present a quantitative model for the biological evolution of species body masses within large groups of related species, e.g., terrestrial mammals, in which body mass M evolves according to branching (speciation), multiplicative diffusion, and an extinction probability that increases logarithmically with mass. We describe this evolution in terms of a convection-diffusion-reaction equation for lnM. The steady-state behavior is in good agreement with empirical data on recent terrestrial mammals, and the time-dependent behavior also agrees with data on extinct mammal species between 95-50 Myr ago.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19257399     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.038103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev Lett        ISSN: 0031-9007            Impact factor:   9.161


  6 in total

1.  Evidence for soft bounds in Ubuntu package sizes and mammalian body masses.

Authors:  Marco Gherardi; Salvatore Mandrà; Bruno Bassetti; Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Multiple routes to mammalian diversity.

Authors:  Chris Venditti; Andrew Meade; Mark Pagel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The biological default state of cell proliferation with variation and motility, a fundamental principle for a theory of organisms.

Authors:  Ana M Soto; Giuseppe Longo; Maël Montévil; Carlos Sonnenschein
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  Can clade age alone explain the relationship between body size and diversity?

Authors:  Rampal S Etienne; Sara N de Visser; Thijs Janzen; Jeanine L Olsen; Han Olff; James Rosindell
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Dynamics of starvation and recovery predict extinction risk and both Damuth's law and Cope's rule.

Authors:  Justin D Yeakel; Christopher P Kempes; Sidney Redner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  How large should whales be?

Authors:  Aaron Clauset
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.