| Literature DB >> 24323736 |
Radha Kothari1, Joseph Gafton, Janet Treasure, Nadia Micali.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Markers of prenatal hormone exposure have been associated with the development of eating disorder (ED) behaviors. Our aim was to determine whether 2D:4D ratio, a marker for in utero testosterone exposure, is associated with risk for ED in a large population-based cohort: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24323736 PMCID: PMC3992907 DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22495
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Hum Biol ISSN: 1042-0533 Impact factor: 1.937
Comparison of sociodemographic factors across groups
| Unexposed | AN | BN | AN and BN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male): | 2,750 (49.2) | 41 (53.2) | 49 (50) | 22 (45.8) |
| Ethnicity (white): | 5,217 (93.3) | 64 (83.1) | 89 (90.8) | 47 (97.9) |
| Social Class (nonmanual): | 4,549 (81.4) | 61 (79.2) | 78 (79.6) | 39 (81.3) |
| Age of Mother at Delivery: mean (SD)2 | 29.1 (4.5) | 31.4 (5.1) | 28.8 (4.4) | 30.4 (4.3) |
Linear regression analysis of children's' 2D:4D ratio (boys and girls analyzed both together and separately): Comparison of exposed and unexposed groups
| Left hand | Right hand | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| B (95% CI) | B (95% CI) | ||
| All children | |||
| Model 1 | AN | 0.000 (−0.007 to 0.007) | −0.004 (−0.012 to 0.003) |
| BN | −0.004 (−0.011 to 0.002) | −0.008 (−0.015 to −0.002) | |
| AN + BN | 0.008 (−0.002 to 0.017) | 0.007 (−0.002 to 0.016) | |
| Model 2 | AN | 0.001 (−0.007 to 0.008) | −0.004 (−0.11 to 0.003) |
| BN | −0.004 (−0.011 to 0.002) | −0.008 (−0.014 to −0.002) | |
| AN + BN | 0.007 (−0.002 to 0.017) | 0.006 (−0.003 to 0.015) | |
| Boys | |||
| Model 1 | AN | 0.003 (−0.007 to 0.013) | −0.003 (−0.013 to 0.007) |
| BN | −0.004 (−0.013 to 0.005) | −0.005 (−0.014 to 0.004) | |
| AN + BN | 0.003 (−0.011 to 0.016) | 0.006 (−0.007 to 0.019) | |
| Model 2 | AN | 0.003 (−0.007 to 0.013) | −0.003 (−0.013 to 0.006) |
| BN | −0.004 (−0.009 to 0.000) | −0.005 (−0.010 to 0.000) | |
| AN + BN | 0.003 (−0.004 to 0.010) | 0.006 (−0.007 to 0.019) | |
| Girls | |||
| Model 1 | AN | −0.002 (−0.013 to 0.009) | −0.005 (−0.015 to 0.006) |
| BN | −0.004 (−0.013 to 0.005) | −0.011 (−0.020 to −0.002) | |
| AN + BN | 0.012 (−0.001 to 0.024) | 0.007 (−0.006 to 0.019) | |
| Model 2 | AN | −0.002 (−0.013 to 0.009) | −0.004 (−0.015 to 0.006) |
| BN | −0.004 (−0.009 to 0.000) | −0.011 (−0.020 to −0.002) | |
| AN + BN | 0.011 (−0.001 to 0.024) | 0.007 (−0.006 to 0.019) | |
<0.05.
Model 1, crude analysis. Model 2, adjusted for child gender, ethnicity, maternal age at delivery and social class.
Figure 1Risk model of prenatal testosterone exposure as mechanism for intergenerational transmission of bingeing.