Literature DB >> 29157751

Preliminary evidence that digit length ratio (2D:4D) predicts neural response to delivery of motivational stimuli.

Troy A Webber1, Heather E Soder2, Geoffrey F Potts2, Marina A Bornovalova2.   

Abstract

Reduced relative length of the 2nd to 4th digits (2D:4D) is thought to partially reflect fetal testosterone (FT) exposure, a process suspected to promote relatively permanent effects on the brain and behavior via structural and functional neuroadaptations. We examined the effect of 2D:4D on neural response - assessed by P2a and feedback-related negativity (FRN) event-related potentials (ERPs) - to motivational stimuli (reward or punishment) using two counterbalanced conditions of a passive S1/S2 outcome prediction design. P2a to expected and unexpected delivered rewards or punishments ($1 or white noise burst, respectively) and FRN to withheld rewards or punishments ($0 or silence, respectively) were observed in undergraduates. Lower left 2D:4D and greater 2D:4DR-L predicted amplified P2a to the delivery (but not FRN to the omission) of motivationally salient stimuli, regardless of valence and probability. These preliminary findings suggest that FT may organize dopamine neurons to respond more strongly to the delivery of motivational stimuli. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D:4D; Digit length ratio; Fetal testosterone; Medial frontal cortex; Reward and punishment sensitivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29157751      PMCID: PMC5801081          DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  30 in total

Review 1.  The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues.

Authors:  John Hunsley; Gregory J Meyer
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2003-12

2.  Finger-length ratios show evidence of prenatal hormone-transfer between opposite-sex twins.

Authors:  Sari M van Anders; Philip A Vernon; Christopher J Wilbur
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 3.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Authors:  Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  The feedback-related negativity signals salience prediction errors, not reward prediction errors.

Authors:  Deborah Talmi; Ryan Atkinson; Wael El-Deredy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Of fingers, toes and penises.

Authors:  T Kondo; J Zákány; J W Innis; D Duboule
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Digit ratio (2D:4D) in newborns: influences of prenatal testosterone and maternal environment.

Authors:  T Ventura; M C Gomes; A Pita; M T Neto; A Taylor
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Developmental basis of sexually dimorphic digit ratios.

Authors:  Zhengui Zheng; Martin J Cohn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Back to the future: The organizational-activational hypothesis adapted to puberty and adolescence.

Authors:  Kalynn M Schulz; Heather A Molenda-Figueira; Cheryl L Sisk
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  Testosterone shifts the balance between sensitivity for punishment and reward in healthy young women.

Authors:  Jack van Honk; Dennis J L G Schutter; Erno J Hermans; Peter Putman; Adriaan Tuiten; Hans Koppeschaar
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.905

10.  Fetal programming effects of testosterone on the reward system and behavioral approach tendencies in humans.

Authors:  Michael V Lombardo; Emma Ashwin; Bonnie Auyeung; Bhismadev Chakrabarti; Meng-Chuan Lai; Kevin Taylor; Gerald Hackett; Edward T Bullmore; Simon Baron-Cohen
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.