Literature DB >> 24323704

Dopamine modulates frontomedial failure processing of agentic introverts versus extraverts in incentive contexts.

Erik M Mueller1, Christin Burgdorf, Mira-Lynn Chavanon, Desiree Schweiger, Jan Wacker, Gerhard Stemmler.   

Abstract

The agency facet of extraversion (aE) describes individual differences in goal-directed behavior and has been linked to dopamine function in incentive contexts. Because dopamine presumably modulates the processing of negative feedback/failure, aE may relate to failure processing in incentive contexts. To test this hypothesis, N = 86 participants performed a virtual ball-catching task. An incentive context was created by displaying potential rewards and subtle manipulations of task performance, which either was (control group) or was not (incentive context group) made explicit. To probe the involvement of dopamine, participants received either placebo or the selective dopamine D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride (200 mg). Failure processing was assessed through negative-feedback-evoked differences in the frontal midline theta electroencephalogram power (DFMT) and in the feedback-related negativity event-related potential component (FRN). Before incentives were introduced, DFMT (but not the FRN) was related to neuroticism/anxiety. Importantly, once incentives were displayed, aE was associated with DFMT, FRN, task performance, and changes in self-reported positive affect, which further depended on incentive context group and/or substance group: In the incentive context group but not in the control group, agentic extraverts showed relatively blunted DFMT after placebo. Sulpiride significantly enhanced DFMT, whereas it reduced FRN amplitudes and performance in agentic extra- versus introverts. These findings provide strong support for current dopamine models of aE and failure processing, and also highlight the importance of task context. Moreover, the dissociations of FRN and DFMT suggest the existence of two nonredundant electrophysiological indices of feedback processing, both relating to dopamine and aE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24323704     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0228-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  52 in total

1.  Individual differences in reward-prediction-error: extraversion and feedback-related negativity.

Authors:  Luke D Smillie; Andrew J Cooper; Alan D Pickering
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring.

Authors:  Stefan Debener; Markus Ullsperger; Markus Siegel; Katja Fiehler; D Yves von Cramon; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Evidence for a dopaminergic link between working memory and agentic extraversion: an analysis of load-related changes in EEG alpha 1 activity.

Authors:  Mira-Lynn Chavanon; Jan Wacker; Anja Leue; Gerhard Stemmler
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Personality, emotion, and individual differences in physiological responses.

Authors:  Gerhard Stemmler; Jan Wacker
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  EEG oscillatory activity associated to monetary gain and loss signals in a learning task: effects of attentional impulsivity and learning ability.

Authors:  Vilfredo De Pascalis; Vincenzo Varriale; Marco Rotonda
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Mediofrontal negativities in the absence of responding.

Authors:  Franc C L Donkers; Sander Nieuwenhuis; Geert J M van Boxtel
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-24

7.  The effect of trial-to-trial feedback on the error-related negativity and its relationship with anxiety.

Authors:  Doreen M Olvet; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 8.  The catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphism: relations to the tonic-phasic dopamine hypothesis and neuropsychiatric phenotypes.

Authors:  Robert M Bilder; Jan Volavka; Herbert M Lachman; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 9.  Discovering endophenotypes for major depression.

Authors:  Gregor Hasler; Wayne C Drevets; Husseini K Manji; Dennis S Charney
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Haloperidol impairs learning and error-related negativity in humans.

Authors:  Patrick J Zirnheld; Christine A Carroll; Paul D Kieffaber; Brian F O'Donnell; Anantha Shekhar; William P Hetrick
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  15 in total

1.  Event-related potentials reflect impaired temporal interval learning following haloperidol administration.

Authors:  Sarah E Forster; Patrick Zirnheld; Anantha Shekhar; Stuart R Steinhauer; Brian F O'Donnell; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Potentiated processing of negative feedback in depression is attenuated by anhedonia.

Authors:  Erik M Mueller; Pia Pechtel; Andrew L Cohen; Samuel R Douglas; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 6.505

3.  From Description to Explanation: Integrating Across Multiple Levels of Analysis to Inform Neuroscientific Accounts of Dimensional Personality Pathology.

Authors:  Timothy A Allen; Alison M Schreiber; Nathan T Hall; Michael N Hallquist
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  2020-10

4.  Amphetamine alters an EEG marker of reward processing in humans and mice.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Sarah L Olguin; Jo A Talledo; Juliana E Kotz; Benjamin Z Roberts; John A Nungaray; Joyce Sprock; David Gregg; Savita G Bhakta; Gregory A Light; Neal R Swerdlow; Jared W Young; Jonathan L Brigman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for the Development of Incentive-Reward Motivation?

Authors:  Monica Luciana; Paul F Collins
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022

6.  Fear Extinction Recall Modulates Human Frontomedial Theta and Amygdala Activity.

Authors:  Matthias F J Sperl; Christian Panitz; Isabelle M Rosso; Daniel G Dillon; Poornima Kumar; Andrea Hermann; Alexis E Whitton; Christiane Hermann; Diego A Pizzagalli; Erik M Mueller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Face-induced expectancies influence neural mechanisms of performance monitoring.

Authors:  Roman Osinsky; Jennifer Seeger; Patrick Mussel; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Dose-response effects of d-amphetamine on effort-based decision-making and reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Heather E Soder; Jessica A Cooper; Paula Lopez-Gamundi; Jennifer K Hoots; Cecilia Nunez; Victoria M Lawlor; Scott D Lane; Michael T Treadway; Margaret C Wardle
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Modeling dopaminergic and other processes involved in learning from reward prediction error: contributions from an individual differences perspective.

Authors:  Alan D Pickering; Francesca Pesola
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Using pharmacological manipulations to study the role of dopamine in human reward functioning: A review of studies in healthy adults.

Authors:  Heather E Webber; Paula Lopez-Gamundi; Sydney N Stamatovich; Harriet de Wit; Margaret C Wardle
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.