Literature DB >> 24323480

Computer-assisted design and computer-assisted modeling technique optimization and advantages over traditional methods of osseous flap reconstruction.

Evan Matros1, Claudia R Albornoz1, Michael Rensberger2, Katherine Weimer2, Evan S Garfein3.   

Abstract

There is increased clinical use of computer-assisted design (CAD) and computer-assisted modeling (CAM) for osseous flap reconstruction, particularly in the head and neck region. Limited information exists about methods to optimize the application of this new technology and for cases in which it may be advantageous over existing methods of osseous flap shaping. A consecutive series of osseous reconstructions planned with CAD/CAM over the past 5 years was analyzed. Conceptual considerations and refinements in the CAD/CAM process were evaluated. A total of 48 reconstructions were performed using CAD/CAM. The majority of cases were performed for head and neck tumor reconstruction or related complications whereas the remainder (4%) were performed for penetrating trauma. Defect location was the mandible (85%), maxilla (12.5%), and pelvis (2%). Reconstruction was performed immediately in 73% of the cases and delayed in 27% of the cases. The mean number of osseous flap bone segments used in reconstruction was 2.41. Areas of optimization include the following: mandible cutting guide placement, osteotomy creation, alternative planning, and saw blade optimization. Identified benefits of CAD/CAM over current techniques include the following: delayed timing, anterior mandible defects, specimen distortion, osteotomy creation in three dimensions, osteotomy junction overlap, plate adaptation, and maxillary reconstruction. Experience with CAD/CAM for osseous reconstruction has identified tools for technique optimization and cases where this technology may prove beneficial over existing methods. Knowledge of these facts may contribute to improved use and main-stream adoption of CAD/CAM virtual surgical planning by reconstructive surgeons. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24323480     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  9 in total

1.  A Virtual Surgical Planning Algorithm for Delayed Maxillomandibular Reconstruction.

Authors:  John T Stranix; Carrie S Stern; Michael Rensberger; Ian Ganly; Jay O Boyle; Robert J Allen; Joseph J Disa; Babak J Mehrara; Evan S Garfein; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Head and neck surgical oncology.

Authors:  Jatin P Shah; Richard J Wong
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 2.885

3.  Short-Term Outcomes following Virtual Surgery-Assisted Immediate Dental Implant Placement in Free Fibula Flaps for Oncologic Mandibular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert J Allen; Jonas A Nelson; Thais O Polanco; Meghana G Shamsunder; Ian Ganly; Jay Boyle; Evan Rosen; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 5.169

4.  A Comparative Study on a Novel Fibula Malleolus Cap to Increase the Accuracy of Oncologic Jaw Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jingya Jane Pu; Wing Shan Choi; Wai Kan Yeung; Wei-Fa Yang; Wang-Yong Zhu; Yu-Xiong Su
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Virtual Surgical Planning for Oncologic Mandibular and Maxillary Reconstruction.

Authors:  Paige L Myers; Jonas A Nelson; Evan B Rosen; Robert J Allen; Joseph J Disa; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-09-17

6.  Immediate Dental Implant Placement in the Oncologic Setting: A Conceptual Framework.

Authors:  Rachel A Anolik; Jonas A Nelson; Evan B Rosen; Joseph Disa; Evan Matros; Robert J Allen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-09-17

Review 7.  Current Trends in the Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of Jaw following Ablative Surgery.

Authors:  Jane J Pu; Samer G Hakim; James C Melville; Yu-Xiong Su
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Long-term Growth, Functional, and Aesthetic Outcomes after Fibula Free Flap Reconstruction for Mandibulectomy Performed in Children.

Authors:  Farooq Shahzad; Peter W Henderson; Evan Matros; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-07-28

9.  Use of artificial intelligence to recover mandibular morphology after disease.

Authors:  Ye Liang; JingJing Huan; Jia-Da Li; CanHua Jiang; ChangYun Fang; YongGang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.