Literature DB >> 24323478

Failure of clindamycin to eradicate infection with beta-hemolytic streptococci inducibly resistant to clindamycin in an animal model and in human infections.

James S Lewis1, Alex J Lepak, George R Thompson, William A Craig, David R Andes, Kathryn E Sabol-Dzintars, James H Jorgensen.   

Abstract

Inducible clindamycin resistance in beta-hemolytic streptococci remains an underrecognized phenomenon of unknown clinical significance. We performed an evaluation of inducible clindamycin resistance using an animal model as well as retrospectively reviewing the charts of patients treated with clindamycin monotherapy who were infected with beta-hemolytic streptococci inducibly resistant to clindamycin. The neutropenic mouse thigh model of infection was used to evaluate the in vivo activity of clindamycin against beta-hemolytic streptococci, including isolates susceptible, inducibly resistant, or constitutively resistant to clindamycin. The clinical microbiology laboratory information system and pharmacy databases were cross-referenced to identify patients with infections due to inducibly clindamycin-resistant beta-hemolytic streptococci who were treated with clindamycin monotherapy. Medical records of these patients were reviewed to evaluate microbiologic and clinical outcomes. Inducible clindamycin resistance resulted in impaired killing of beta-hemolytic streptococci in the animal model. Though suppressed initially, compared to those with constitutive resistance (P=0.0429), by 48 h, colony counts of inducibly clindamycin-resistant organisms were similar to those of constitutively resistant isolates (P=0.1142). In addition, we identified 8 patients infected with inducibly clindamycin-resistant beta-hemolytic streptococci who experienced clinical and microbiologic failure when treated with clindamycin monotherapy. These patients either improved initially and subsequently failed or never responded to clindamycin therapy. We have demonstrated in a murine model of infection and from human cases that inducible clindamycin resistance in beta-hemolytic streptococci is clinically significant. Routine testing and reporting by clinical laboratories should be encouraged and alternative antimicrobial agents considered when these organisms are encountered in clinical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24323478      PMCID: PMC3957897          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01877-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  12 in total

1.  MLS resistance phenotypes and mechanisms in beta-haemolytic group B, C and G Streptococcus isolates in La Rioja, Spain.

Authors:  A Portillo; M Lantero; I Olarte; F Ruiz-Larrea; C Torres
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Antibiotic susceptibility and mechanisms of erythromycin resistance in clinical isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: French multicenter study.

Authors:  D De Mouy; J D Cavallo; R Leclercq; R Fabre
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Mechanisms of macrolide resistance in clinical group B streptococci isolated in France.

Authors:  F Fitoussi; C Loukil; I Gros; O Clermont; P Mariani; S Bonacorsi; I Le Thomas; D Deforche; E Bingen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections.

Authors:  Dennis L Stevens; Alan L Bisno; Henry F Chambers; E Dale Everett; Patchen Dellinger; Ellie J C Goldstein; Sherwood L Gorbach; Jan V Hirschmann; Edward L Kaplan; Jose G Montoya; James C Wade
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococci: should clinicians and microbiologists be concerned?

Authors:  James S Lewis; James H Jorgensen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 6.  Mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides: nature of the resistance elements and their clinical implications.

Authors:  Roland Leclercq
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-01-11       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Characterization of antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from the San Francisco Bay area of northern California.

Authors:  M K York; L Gibbs; F Perdreau-Remington; G F Brooks
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Prevalence and mechanisms of erythromycin resistance in group A and group B Streptococcus: implications for reporting susceptibility results.

Authors:  M Desjardins; K L Delgaty; K Ramotar; C Seetaram; B Toye
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci in schoolchildren in Pittsburgh.

Authors:  Judith M Martin; Michael Green; Karen A Barbadora; Ellen R Wald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Activities of clindamycin, daptomycin, doxycycline, linezolid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin against community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with inducible clindamycin resistance in murine thigh infection and in vitro pharmacodynamic models.

Authors:  Kerry L LaPlante; Steven N Leonard; David R Andes; William A Craig; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of Drug Susceptibility of Microorganisms in Odontogenic Inflammations and Dental Surgery Procedures Performed on an Outpatient Basis.

Authors:  Mateusz Bogacz; Tadeusz Morawiec; Joanna Śmieszek-Wilczewska; Katarzyna Janowska-Bogacz; Anna Bubiłek-Bogacz; Rafał Rój; Karolina Pinocy; Anna Mertas
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 2.  Antibiotic Treatment, Mechanisms for Failure, and Adjunctive Therapies for Infections by Group A Streptococcus.

Authors:  Anders F Johnson; Christopher N LaRock
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 5.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.