Sheila R Reddy1, Dennis Ross-Degnan, Alan M Zaslavsky, Stephen B Soumerai, James F Wharam. 1. *Harvard University PhD Program in Health Policy, Cambridge, MA †Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Institute ‡Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: By shifting a greater share of out-of-pocket medical costs to consumers, high-deductible health plans (HDHP) might discourage use of essential outpatient services. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine the impact of an HDHP on outpatient visits and associated laboratory and radiology tests. RESEARCH DESIGN/ SUBJECTS: We used a pre-post with comparison group study design to examine the differential change in outpatient service utilization among 7953 adults who were switched from a traditional Health Maintenance Organization plan to an HDHP compared with 7953 adults remaining in traditional plans. HDHP members had full coverage of preventive laboratory tests and modest copayments for outpatient visits, similar to controls, but faced full cost sharing under the deductible for radiology tests and laboratory tests not classified as preventive. RESULTS: Compared with controls, the HDHP group experienced moderate relative decreases in overall office visits (incidence rate ratios = 0.91, or a 9% relative reduction; 95% confidence interval: 0.88, 0.94) and visits for higher-priority (0.91; 0.85, 0.97) and lower-priority (0.89; 0.81, 0.99) chronic conditions. There were no significant differences in changes in visit rates for acute higher-priority or lower-priority conditions (both 0.93; 0.86, 1.01) or preventive laboratory tests (0.97; 0.93, 1.02). HDHP members showed moderate relative reductions in the use of general laboratory tests (0.91; 0.86, 0.97) but not radiology tests (0.97; 0.91, 1.03). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic outpatient visits declined among HDHP members, although preventive laboratory tests and acute visits remained unchanged. HDHP patients with chronic illnesses who have more contact with the health care system might be more likely to reduce utilization because of increased exposure to costs associated with ambulatory visits.
BACKGROUND: By shifting a greater share of out-of-pocket medical costs to consumers, high-deductible health plans (HDHP) might discourage use of essential outpatient services. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine the impact of an HDHP on outpatient visits and associated laboratory and radiology tests. RESEARCH DESIGN/ SUBJECTS: We used a pre-post with comparison group study design to examine the differential change in outpatient service utilization among 7953 adults who were switched from a traditional Health Maintenance Organization plan to an HDHP compared with 7953 adults remaining in traditional plans. HDHP members had full coverage of preventive laboratory tests and modest copayments for outpatient visits, similar to controls, but faced full cost sharing under the deductible for radiology tests and laboratory tests not classified as preventive. RESULTS: Compared with controls, the HDHP group experienced moderate relative decreases in overall office visits (incidence rate ratios = 0.91, or a 9% relative reduction; 95% confidence interval: 0.88, 0.94) and visits for higher-priority (0.91; 0.85, 0.97) and lower-priority (0.89; 0.81, 0.99) chronic conditions. There were no significant differences in changes in visit rates for acute higher-priority or lower-priority conditions (both 0.93; 0.86, 1.01) or preventive laboratory tests (0.97; 0.93, 1.02). HDHP members showed moderate relative reductions in the use of general laboratory tests (0.91; 0.86, 0.97) but not radiology tests (0.97; 0.91, 1.03). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic outpatient visits declined among HDHP members, although preventive laboratory tests and acute visits remained unchanged. HDHP patients with chronic illnesses who have more contact with the health care system might be more likely to reduce utilization because of increased exposure to costs associated with ambulatory visits.
Authors: Susan H Busch; Colleen L Barry; Sally J Vegso; Jody L Sindelar; Mark R Cullen Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jessica Greene; Judith Hibbard; James F Murray; Steven M Teutsch; Marc L Berger Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2008 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Teresa M Waters; Cyril F Chang; William T Cecil; Panagiotis Kasteridis; David Mirvis Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Sheila K Reiss; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Fang Zhang; Stephen B Soumerai; Alan M Zaslavsky; J Frank Wharam Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Joshua J Fenton; Michael Von Korff; Elizabeth H B Lin; Paul Ciechanowski; Bessie A Young Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Amy M Kilbourne; Jack R Cornelius; Xiaoyan Han; Harold A Pincus; Mujeeb Shad; Ihsan Salloum; Joseph Conigliaro; Gretchen L Haas Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman; David H Rehkopf; S V Subramanian Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: J Frank Wharam; Fang Zhang; Emma M Eggleston; Christine Y Lu; Stephen Soumerai; Dennis Ross-Degnan Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Vlad V Simianu; Alessandro Fichera; Amir L Bastawrous; Giana H Davidson; Michael G Florence; Richard C Thirlby; David R Flum Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Janet S de Moor; Robin A Cohen; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Susan A Sabatino; K Robin Yabroff; Stacey Fedewa; Richard Lee; V Paul Doria-Rose; Cheryl Altice; Carrie N Klabunde Journal: Prev Med Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Meredith B Rosenthal; Carrie H Colla; Nancy E Morden; Thomas D Sequist; Alexander J Mainor; Zhonghe Li; Kevin H Nguyen Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 2.229