Literature DB >> 24322889

Echocardiographic measurement methods for left ventricular linear dimensions in children result in predictable variations in results.

Shelby Kutty1, David Russell, Ling Li, Rimsha Hasan, Qinghai Peng, Peter C Frommelt, David A Danford.   

Abstract

Precise quantification of left ventricular (LV) cavity dimensions assumes great importance in clinical cardiology. Pediatric guidelines recommend the left parasternal short axis (PSA) imaging plane for measuring LV cavity dimensions, while measuring from the long axis (PLA) plane is the convention in adult echocardiography. We sought to compare measurements obtained by two-dimensional (2D) and M-mode (MM) techniques in the two imaging planes. Healthy subjects were prospectively recruited for research echocardiography. Complete 2D, spectral and color flow Doppler examinations were performed in a non-sedated state. All subjects had structurally and functionally normal hearts. LV cavity dimensions were obtained in PLA and PSA views using 2D and MM yielding four measurement sets for each subject: PLA direct 2D; PLA 2D-guided MM, PSA direct 2D, PSA 2D-guided MM. A commercially available ultrasound system (Vivid E9, GE) was used and data stored digitally for subsequent analysis (EchoPAC BT11, GE). Acquisition and measurements were made by a single observer from at least three consecutive cardiac cycles, and averaged for each of the four categories. The study cohort consisted of 114 subjects (mean age 9 years, range 1-18; mean BSA 1.1 m(2), range 0.42-2.6). The smallest estimate of LV end-diastolic dimension (LVED) was obtained by PLA 2D, with larger estimates by PLA MM, PSA 2D, and PSA MM. Largest estimates of LV end-systolic dimension (LVES) are by 2D methods, with smaller estimates by both MM techniques. The smallest shortening fraction (SF) was by PLA 2D; other methods yielded larger SF. Temporal resolution is limited in 2D methodology and may account for the smaller LVED, larger LVES and smaller SF observed. Long axis methodology may predispose to off-center or non-perpendicular data acquisition and the potential for dimensional underestimation, particularly in diastole. Consistency in method for assessment of LV dimensions in children is an important factor for serial comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24322889     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0348-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  19 in total

1.  Standardization of fetal ultrasound biometry measurements: improving the quality and consistency of measurements.

Authors:  I Sarris; C Ioannou; M Dighe; A Mitidieri; M Oberto; W Qingqing; J Shah; S Sohoni; W Al Zidjali; L Hoch; D G Altman; A T Papageorghiou
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for quality echocardiography laboratory operations.

Authors:  Michael H Picard; David Adams; S Michelle Bierig; John M Dent; Pamela S Douglas; Linda D Gillam; Andrew M Keller; David J Malenka; Frederick A Masoudi; Marti McCulloch; Patricia A Pellikka; Priscilla J Peters; Raymond F Stainback; G Monet Strachan; William A Zoghbi
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 4.  Role of M-mode technique in today's echocardiography.

Authors:  Harvey Feigenbaum
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  Reproducibility of quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  R B Himelman; M M Cassidy; J S Landzberg; N B Schiller
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 6.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms.

Authors:  N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 7.  Reproducibility of echocardiographic left ventricular measurements.

Authors:  D C Wallerson; R B Devereux
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Effect of respiration on the echocardiogram in children with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  D P Morin; C M Cottrill; G L Johnson; H D Wilson; D L Vine; J A Noonan
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults.

Authors:  G B Haycock; G J Schwartz; D H Wisotsky
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Should echocardiography be performed to assess effects of antihypertensive therapy? Test-retest reliability of echocardiography for measurement of left ventricular mass and function.

Authors:  J S Gottdiener; S V Livengood; P S Meyer; G A Chase
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

1.  Left Ventricular Dilation: When Pediatric Meet Adult Guidelines.

Authors:  Jill Harmon; Kacy Sisco; Marc Dutro; Clifford L Cua
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 1.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.