BACKGROUND: As the prevalence of chronic disease amongst older workers is high and increasing, it is important to know if the large subgroup of older workers with chronic disease has specific needs when it comes to prolonging participation in paid work. OBJECTIVES: To investigate differences and similarities in predictors of having paid work in workers aged 55+ with and without chronic disease. METHODS: Workers aged 55-62 years were selected from the 2002-2003 cohort of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (n = 333). Potential predictors were: health, personality, work characteristics, and demographics. Per potential predictor, a logistic regression coefficient for 'having paid work in 2005-2006' was calculated for workers with and without chronic disease. A pooled estimate was computed and differences between the pooled estimate and the coefficients were tested. Results Follow-up data were available for 95 %, of whom 67 % still had paid work. Predictors of having paid work were similar for workers with and without chronic diseases, except for physical workload (χ(2) = 5.37; DF = 1) and psychosocial resources at work (χ(2) = 5.94; DF = 1). Having more psychosocial resources (OR = 3.57; 95 %CI 1.33-10.0) was predictive for having paid work in workers with chronic disease and not in workers without chronic disease. Lower age, more weekly working hours, no functional limitations, fewer depressive symptoms, lower neuroticism scores, and more sense of mastery were significantly associated with having paid work in all workers. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between predictors of having paid work between workers with and without chronic disease should be taken into account when aiming to prevent exit from the workforce. In particular the vulnerable subgroup of older workers with chronic disease and low psychosocial resources at work is more likely to quit working.
BACKGROUND: As the prevalence of chronic disease amongst older workers is high and increasing, it is important to know if the large subgroup of older workers with chronic disease has specific needs when it comes to prolonging participation in paid work. OBJECTIVES: To investigate differences and similarities in predictors of having paid work in workers aged 55+ with and without chronic disease. METHODS: Workers aged 55-62 years were selected from the 2002-2003 cohort of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (n = 333). Potential predictors were: health, personality, work characteristics, and demographics. Per potential predictor, a logistic regression coefficient for 'having paid work in 2005-2006' was calculated for workers with and without chronic disease. A pooled estimate was computed and differences between the pooled estimate and the coefficients were tested. Results Follow-up data were available for 95 %, of whom 67 % still had paid work. Predictors of having paid work were similar for workers with and without chronic diseases, except for physical workload (χ(2) = 5.37; DF = 1) and psychosocial resources at work (χ(2) = 5.94; DF = 1). Having more psychosocial resources (OR = 3.57; 95 %CI 1.33-10.0) was predictive for having paid work in workers with chronic disease and not in workers without chronic disease. Lower age, more weekly working hours, no functional limitations, fewer depressive symptoms, lower neuroticism scores, and more sense of mastery were significantly associated with having paid work in all workers. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between predictors of having paid work between workers with and without chronic disease should be taken into account when aiming to prevent exit from the workforce. In particular the vulnerable subgroup of older workers with chronic disease and low psychosocial resources at work is more likely to quit working.
Authors: Martijn Huisman; Jan Poppelaars; Marleen van der Horst; Aartjan T F Beekman; Johannes Brug; Theo G van Tilburg; Dorly J H Deeg Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2011-01-06 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Sarah I Detaille; Yvonne F Heerkens; Josephine A Engels; Joost W J van der Gulden; Frank J H van Dijk Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Suzan J W Robroek; Merel Schuring; Simone Croezen; Mikael Stattin; Alex Burdorf Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2012-09-03 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Cécile R L Boot; Swenne G van den Heuvel; Ute Bültmann; Angela G E M de Boer; Lando L J Koppes; Allard J van der Beek Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2013-06
Authors: Minna Karpansalo; Pirjo Manninen; Timo A Lakka; Jussi Kauhanen; Rainer Rauramaa; Jukka T Salonen Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Cécile R L Boot; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Ute Bültmann; Ben C Amick; Allard J van der Beek Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Angela G E M de Boer; Goedele A Geuskens; Ute Bültmann; Cécile R L Boot; Haije Wind; Lando L J Koppes; Monique H W Frings-Dresen Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Emiel O Hoogendijk; Dorly J H Deeg; Jan Poppelaars; Marleen van der Horst; Marjolein I Broese van Groenou; Hannie C Comijs; H Roeline W Pasman; Natasja M van Schoor; Bianca Suanet; Fleur Thomése; Theo G van Tilburg; Marjolein Visser; Martijn Huisman Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2016-08-20 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Emil Sundstrup; Åse Marie Hansen; Erik Lykke Mortensen; Otto Melchior Poulsen; Thomas Clausen; Reiner Rugulies; Anne Møller; Lars L Andersen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Astrid de Wind; Micky Scharn; Goedele A Geuskens; Allard J van der Beek; Cécile R L Boot Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-02-17 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ranu Sewdas; Allard J van der Beek; Astrid de Wind; Lennart G L van der Zwaan; Cécile R L Boot Journal: Scand J Public Health Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 3.021
Authors: Maria Fleischmann; Ewan Carr; Baowen Xue; Paola Zaninotto; Stephen A Stansfeld; Mai Stafford; Jenny Head Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2018-06-23 Impact factor: 3.710