Literature DB >> 24322530

Sentinel node biopsy using a magnetic tracer versus standard technique: the SentiMAG Multicentre Trial.

Michael Douek1, Joost Klaase, Ian Monypenny, Ashutosh Kothari, Katalin Zechmeister, Douglas Brown, Lynda Wyld, Philip Drew, Hans Garmo, Olorunsola Agbaje, Quentin Pankhurst, Bauke Anninga, Maarten Grootendorst, Bennie Ten Haken, Margaret A Hall-Craggs, Arnie Purushotham, Sarah Pinder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The SentiMAG Multicentre Trial evaluated a new magnetic technique for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) against the standard (radioisotope and blue dye or radioisotope alone). The magnetic technique does not use radiation and provides both a color change (brown dye) and a handheld probe for node localization. The primary end point of this trial was defined as the proportion of sentinel nodes detected with each technique (identification rate).
METHODS: A total of 160 women with breast cancer scheduled for SLNB, who were clinically and radiologically node negative, were recruited from seven centers in the United Kingdom and The Netherlands. SLNB was undertaken after administration of both the magnetic and standard tracers (radioisotope with or without blue dye).
RESULTS: A total of 170 SLNB procedures were undertaken on 161 patients, and 1 patient was excluded, leaving 160 patients for further analysis. The identification rate was 95.0 % (152 of 160) with the standard technique and 94.4 % (151 of 160) with the magnetic technique (0.6 % difference; 95 % upper confidence limit 4.4 %; 6.9 % discordance). Of the 22 % (35 of 160) of patients with lymph node involvement, 16 % (25 of 160) had at least 1 macrometastasis, and 6 % (10 of 160) had at least a micrometastasis. Another 2.5 % (4 of 160) had isolated tumor cells. Of 404 lymph nodes removed, 297 (74 %) were true sentinel nodes. The lymph node retrieval rate was 2.5 nodes per patient overall, 1.9 nodes per patient with the standard technique, and 2.0 nodes per patient with the magnetic technique.
CONCLUSIONS: The magnetic technique is a feasible technique for SLNB, with an identification rate that is not inferior to the standard technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24322530     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3379-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  44 in total

1.  Hybrid 99mTc-magnetite tracer for dual modality sentinel lymph node mapping.

Authors:  Aidan Cousins; Chris Tsopelas; George Balalis; Sarah K Thompson; Dylan Bartholomeusz; A Bruce Wedding; Benjamin Thierry
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: Magnetic Tracer as the Only Localizing Agent.

Authors:  Vivian Man; Ting Ting Wong; Michael Co; Dacita Suen; Ava Kwong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  A comprehensive literatures update of clinical researches of superparamagnetic resonance iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Jean-Marc Idée
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-02

Review 4.  New Technologies for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection.

Authors:  Amit Goyal
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Impact of Locally Administered Carboxydextran-Coated Super-Paramagnetic Iron Nanoparticles on Cellular Immune Function.

Authors:  Luisa Pedro; Quentin Harmer; Eric Mayes; Jacqueline D Shields
Journal:  Small       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 13.281

6.  Evaluation of Radiation Exposure During Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Rajaram Burrah; Karen James; Shabbir Poonawala
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Pre-operative sentinel lymph node localization in breast cancer with superparamagnetic iron oxide MRI: the SentiMAG Multicentre Trial imaging subprotocol.

Authors:  Joost J Pouw; Maarten R Grootendorst; Roland Bezooijen; Caroline A H Klazen; Wieger I De Bruin; Joost M Klaase; Margaret A Hall-Craggs; Michael Douek; Bennie Ten Haken
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Feeling blue, going green and finding other attractive alternatives: a case of biphasic anaphylaxis to patent blue and a literature review of alternative sentinel node localisation methods.

Authors:  Fahad Mujtaba Iqbal; Abdul Basit; Fathi Salem; Raghavan Vidya
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-12-15

Review 9.  New Frontiers in Molecular Imaging with Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (SPIONs): Efficacy, Toxicity, and Future Applications.

Authors:  Viviana Frantellizzi; Miriam Conte; Mariano Pontico; Arianna Pani; Roberto Pani; Giuseppe De Vincentis
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-02-08

10.  Magnetic Nanoparticles: Material Engineering and Emerging Applications in Lithography and Biomedicine.

Authors:  Yuping Bao; Tianlong Wen; Anna Cristina S Samia; Amit Khandhar; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  J Mater Sci       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.220

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.