Carsten R Hamann1, Waranya Boonchai2, Liping Wen3, Emi Nishijima Sakanashi4, Chia-Yu Chu5, Kylin Hamann6, Curtis P Hamann7, Kumar Sinniah6, Dathan Hamann8. 1. Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California. Electronic address: hamann511@gmail.com. 2. Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. 3. Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 4. Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. 5. National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 6. Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan. 7. Contact Dermatitis Institute, Phoenix, Arizona. 8. University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cosmetic skin lightening is practiced worldwide. Mercury is a well-documented melanotoxin added to some lightening products. However, mercury can cause many dermatologic, renal, and neurologic problems. The Food and Drug Administration limits the amount of mercury in cosmetic products to trace amounts, 1 ppm. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate a large international sample of lightening products for mercury content, focusing on products available to US consumers either online or in stores. METHODS: A total of 549 skin-lightening products, manufactured in 32 countries, were purchased online in the United States, Taiwan, and Japan and in stores in the United States, China, Taiwan, Thailand, Japan, and Sri Lanka. Cosmetics were screened for mercury content above 200 ppm using a low-cost portable x-ray fluorescence spectrometer. RESULTS: Of the 549 tested products, 6.0% (n = 33) contained mercury above 1000 ppm. In all, 45% of mercury-containing samples contained mercury in excess of 10,000 ppm. Of lightening products purchased in the United States, 3.3% were found to contain mercury in excess of 1000 ppm. LIMITATIONS: Our study did not evaluate creams for other melanosuppressive ingredients. Only 1 sample of each product was tested. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the national and global presence of mercury in skin-lightening products.
BACKGROUND: Cosmetic skin lightening is practiced worldwide. Mercury is a well-documented melanotoxin added to some lightening products. However, mercury can cause many dermatologic, renal, and neurologic problems. The Food and Drug Administration limits the amount of mercury in cosmetic products to trace amounts, 1 ppm. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate a large international sample of lightening products for mercury content, focusing on products available to US consumers either online or in stores. METHODS: A total of 549 skin-lightening products, manufactured in 32 countries, were purchased online in the United States, Taiwan, and Japan and in stores in the United States, China, Taiwan, Thailand, Japan, and Sri Lanka. Cosmetics were screened for mercury content above 200 ppm using a low-cost portable x-ray fluorescence spectrometer. RESULTS: Of the 549 tested products, 6.0% (n = 33) contained mercury above 1000 ppm. In all, 45% of mercury-containing samples contained mercury in excess of 10,000 ppm. Of lightening products purchased in the United States, 3.3% were found to contain mercury in excess of 1000 ppm. LIMITATIONS: Our study did not evaluate creams for other melanosuppressive ingredients. Only 1 sample of each product was tested. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the national and global presence of mercury in skin-lightening products.
Authors: Louise A Brinton; Jonine D Figueroa; Daniel Ansong; Kofi M Nyarko; Seth Wiafe; Joel Yarney; Richard Biritwum; Michelle Brotzman; Jake E Thistle; Ernest Adjei; Francis Aitpillah; Florence Dedey; Lawrence Edusei; Nicholas Titiloye; Baffour Awuah; Joe Nat Clegg-Lamptey; Beatrice Wiafe-Addai; Verna Vanderpuye Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Thomas Murphy; Sothea Kim; Prean Chanra; Sereyrath Lim; Kenneth Wilson; Kim N Irvine; Darell G Slotton; Lori Allen Journal: J Health Pollut Date: 2015-12-21
Authors: Ayoub Abdullah Alqadami; Mu Naushad; Mohammad Abulhassan Abdalla; Mohammad Rizwan Khan; Zeid Abdullah Alothman; Saikh Mohammad Wabaidur; Ayman Abdel Ghfar Journal: IET Nanobiotechnol Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 1.847