Literature DB >> 24321262

Small renal cell carcinomas--how dangerous are they really? Results of a large multicenter study.

Sandra Steffens1, Kerstin Junker2, Frederik C Roos3, Martin Janssen4, Frank Becker4, Daniela Henn5, Gerd Wegener6, Stefan Siemer4, Rainer Hofmann7, Mark Schrader5, Michael Stöckle4, Joachim W Thüroff3, Arndt Hartmann8, Markus A Kuczyk9, Andres J Schrader10.   

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: Modern diagnostic ultrasound and cross-sectional imaging has enabled the detection of increasing numbers of renal tumours. The aim of this study was to investigate the tumour- and patient-specific characteristics and prognosis of small renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) after surgical resection.
METHODS: The study included 2197 patients who underwent surgical resection of histologically confirmed RCC ⩽ 4 cm between 1990 and 2011. Median (mean) follow-up was 56.2 (65.5) months.
RESULTS: At the time of surgery, tumours were staged as pT ⩾ 3a in 175 (8.0%) cases, 134 (6.2%) were poorly differentiated and 75 (3.5%) were metastasised. The larger the tumour size, the higher was the risk of presenting with stage pT ⩾ 3a (p<0.001), poor tumour differentiation (p = 0.004), microscopic vascular involvement (p = 0.001) and collecting system invasion (p = 0.03). The 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate was 93.8% for stage pT1a versus 79.4% for stage pT ⩾ 3a (p<0.001), and it was 93.7% for G1-2 versus 76.8% for G3-4 differentiation (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified age in years (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, p<0.001), metastatic disease (HR 12.5, p < 0.001), tumour differentiation (HR 2.8, p<0.001) and non-clear cell histology (HR 0.51, p = 0.02) as independent prognosticators for CSS in patients with small RCC. Interestingly, the 5-year cancer-specific mortality rate for pT1a N/M0 patients was 5.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: This large multicenter study has clearly shown that, though most small RCC have a low pathological stage and a good prognosis, there is also a small but significant subgroup of these tumours that are already locally advanced or poorly differentiated.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Follow-up; Kidney cancer; Metastasis; Prognosis; Risk factor; Small renal tumours; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24321262     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of Urine Aquaporin-1 and Perilipin-2 Concentrations as Biomarkers to Screen for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jeremiah J Morrissey; Vincent M Mellnick; Jingqin Luo; Marilyn J Siegel; R Sherburne Figenshau; Sam Bhayani; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Prognostic Factors for Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes Diagnosed According to the 2016 WHO Renal Tumor Classification: a Study Involving 928 Patients.

Authors:  Levente Kuthi; Alex Jenei; Adrienn Hajdu; István Németh; Zoltán Varga; Zoltán Bajory; László Pajor; Béla Iványi
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Survival analysis of surgically treated renal cell carcinoma: a single Chinese medical center experience from 2002 to 2012.

Authors:  Yushi Zhang; Hongyan Yu; Hanzhong Li
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Urine aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2 differentiate renal carcinomas from other imaged renal masses and bladder and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeremiah J Morrissey; Jonathan Mobley; R Sherburne Figenshau; Joel Vetter; Sam Bhayani; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Implications on clinical management of the small renal mass in patients 80 years of age and older based on a retrospective review of the SEER database.

Authors:  Douglas H Russell; Mitchell S Wachtel; Heiko W de Riese; Allan L Haynes; Werner T W de Riese
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Associations Between CT Features and Patient Survival.

Authors:  Andreas M Hötker; Christoph A Karlo; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Paul Russo; Hedvig Hricak; Oguz Akin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Positive surgical margins in nephron-sparing surgery: risk factors and therapeutic consequences.

Authors:  Julie Steinestel; Sandra Steffens; Konrad Steinestel; Andres Jan Schrader
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Patterns of gene expression characterize T1 and T3 clear cell renal cell carcinoma subtypes.

Authors:  Agnieszka M Borys; Michał Seweryn; Tomasz Gołąbek; Łukasz Bełch; Agnieszka Klimkowska; Justyna Totoń-Żurańska; Julita Machlowska; Piotr Chłosta; Krzysztof Okoń; Paweł P Wołkow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Survival advantage of partial over radical nephrectomy in patients presenting with localized renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Frederik C Roos; Sandra Steffens; Kerstin Junker; Martin Janssen; Frank Becker; Gerd Wegener; Walburgis Brenner; Julie Steinestel; Thomas J Schnoeller; Mark Schrader; Rainer Hofmann; Joachim W Thüroff; Markus A Kuczyk; Heiko Wunderlich; Stefan Siemer; Arndt Hartmann; Michael Stöckle; Andres J Schrader
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection of small renal masses: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiang-Feng Wu; Chao Wu; Yun-Lai Wang; Zheng-Ping Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.