Literature DB >> 24321101

Usefulness of magnetic resonance in patients with invasive cancer eligible for breast conservation: a comparative study.

Alessandro Fancellu1, Daniela Soro2, Paolo Castiglia3, Vincenzo Marras4, Marcovalerio Melis5, Pietrina Cottu6, Alessandra Cherchi6, Angela Spanu7, Silvia Mulas6, Claudio Pusceddu8, Luca Simbula2, Giovanni B Meloni2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in newly detected breast cancer remains controversial. We investigated the impact of preoperative MRI on surgical management of infiltrating breast carcinoma (IBC).
METHODS: We reviewed data of 237 patients with IBC who were suitable for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) between 2009 and 2011. Of these patients, 109 underwent preoperative MRI (46%; MRI group) and 128 did not (54%; no-MRI group). We analyzed MRI-triggered changes in surgical plan and compared differences in rates of positive margins and mastectomy.
RESULTS: Tumor size was larger in the MRI group (16.8 mm vs. 13.9 mm; P < .001). MRI changed the initial surgical planning in 18 of 109 patients (16.5%) because of detection of larger tumor diameter requiring wider resection (8 patients [7.3%]) or additional malignant lesions in the ipsilateral (9 patients [8.2%]) or contralateral breast (1 patient [0.9%]). MRI-triggered treatment changes included mastectomy (n = 12), wider excision (n = 5), and contralateral BCS (n = 1). Reoperation rates for positive margins after BCS appeared higher in the no-MRI group (4.1% vs. 8.6%), but the difference missed statistical significance (P = .9). Overall mastectomy rates were higher in the MRI group (13.7% vs. 7.0%; P < .05). The likelihood of having a change of treatment resulting from MRI was significantly higher for patients with tumors > 15 mm and for those with positive lymph nodes.
CONCLUSION: Lymph node positivity and tumor size > 15 mm may predict an MRI-triggered change in surgical plan. Preoperative MRI resulted in higher mastectomy rates justified by biopsy-proven additional foci of carcinoma and did not significantly reduce reoperation rates for positive margins.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer treatment; Breast-conserving surgery; Invasive carcinoma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Margins

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24321101     DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2013.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Comparing Clinicopathologic Features and Surgical Treatment of Premenopausal Breast Cancer across Italy and China: Report from a Medical Exchange Program.

Authors:  Alessandro Fancellu; Xue Yun Zhao; Pietrina Cottu; Valeria Sanna; Yuan Ping Li; Qin Zhu; Cinzia Tanda; Ying Yi Zhang; Yan Mei Lai; Giorgio Carlo Ginesu; Shu Qin Dai; Alberto Porcu
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Can algorithmically assessed MRI features predict which patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ are upstaged to invasive breast cancer?

Authors:  Michael R Harowicz; Ashirbani Saha; Lars J Grimm; P Kelly Marcom; Jeffrey R Marks; E Shelley Hwang; Maciej A Mazurowski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Considerations arising from requests from patients for a bilateral mastectomy who are eligible for breast-conserving surgery: Factors weighing for and against performing the operation.

Authors:  Alessandro Fancellu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Frequency and Clinical Significance of Extramammary Findings on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Sneha Phadke; Alexandra Thomas; Limin Yang; Catherine Moore; Chang Xia; Mary C Schroeder
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Optimising Breast Conservation Treatment for Multifocal and Multicentric Breast Cancer: A Worthwhile Endeavour?

Authors:  Mona P Tan; Nadya Y Sitoh; Yih Yiow Sitoh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Overview of Breast Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Tracy-Ann Moo; Rachel Sanford; Chau Dang; Monica Morrow
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-07

7.  Minimising unnecessary mastectomies in a predominantly Chinese community.

Authors:  Mona P Tan; Nadya Y Sitoh; Yih Y Sitoh
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-26

Review 8.  The Changing World of Breast Cancer: A Radiologist's Perspective.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of breast cancer treatment strategies: comparison with conventional imaging techniques.

Authors:  Luciana Karla Lira França; Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt; Hugo Lamartine Souza Paiva; Caroline Baptista Silva; Nara Pacheco Pereira; Jociana Paludo; Luciana Graziano; Camila Souza Guatelli; Juliana Alves de Souza; Elvira Ferreira Marques
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

10.  Does Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Conventional Imaging Modalities Decrease the Rates of Surgical Margin Involvement and Reoperation?: A Case-Control Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Hung-Wen Lai; Chih-Jung Chen; Ying-Jen Lin; Shu-Ling Chen; Hwa-Koon Wu; Yu-Ting Wu; Shou-Jen Kuo; Shou-Tung Chen; Dar-Ren Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.