Literature DB >> 24318071

Use of 3D MR reconstructions in the evaluation of glenoid bone loss: a clinical study.

Soterios Gyftopoulos1, Luis S Beltran, Avner Yemin, Eric Strauss, Robert Meislin, Laith Jazrawi, Michael P Recht.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of 3D MR shoulder reconstructions to accurately quantify glenoid bone loss in the clinical setting using findings at the time of arthroscopy as the gold standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with MR shoulder studies that included 3D MR reconstructions (3D MR) produced using an axial Dixon 3D-T1W-FLASH sequence at our institution was conducted with the following inclusion criteria: history of anterior shoulder dislocation, arthroscopy (OR) performed within 6 months of the MRI, and an estimate of glenoid bone loss made in the OR using the bare-spot method. Two musculoskeletal radiologists produced estimates of bone loss along the glenoid width, measured in mm and %, on 3D MR using the best-fit circle method, which were then compared to the OR measurements.
RESULTS: There were a total of 15 patients (13 men, two women; mean age, 28, range, 19-51 years). There was no significant difference, on average, between the MRI (mean 3.4 mm/12.6 %; range, 0-30 %) and OR (mean, 12.7 %; range, 0-30 %) measurements of glenoid bone loss (p = 0.767). A 95 % confidence interval for the mean absolute error extended from 0.45-2.21 %, implying that, when averaged over all patients, the true mean absolute error of the MRI measurements relative to the OR measurements is expected to be less than 2.21 %. Inter-reader agreement between the two readers had an IC of 0.92 and CC of 0.90 in terms of percentage of bone loss.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D MR reconstructions of the shoulder can be used to accurately measure glenoid bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24318071     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1774-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  39 in total

1.  Glenohumeral articular contact areas and pressures following labral and osseous injury to the anteroinferior quadrant of the glenoid.

Authors:  Patrick E Greis; Matthew G Scuderi; Alexander Mohr; Kent N Bachus; Robert T Burks
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  [Treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder].

Authors:  M LATARJET
Journal:  Lyon Chir       Date:  1954 Nov-Dec

3.  Quantification of a glenoid defect with three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Pol E Huijsmans; Pieter S Haen; Martin Kidd; Wouter J Dhert; Victor P M van der Hulst; W Jaap Willems
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  MR imaging for traumatic tears of the rotator cuff: high prevalence of greater tuberosity fractures and subscapularis tendon tears.

Authors:  M Zanetti; D Weishaupt; B Jost; C Gerber; J Hodler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Effect of a chondral-labral defect on glenoid concavity and glenohumeral stability. A cadaveric model.

Authors:  M D Lazarus; J A Sidles; D T Harryman; F A Matsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  3DMR osseous reconstructions of the shoulder using a gradient-echo based two-point Dixon reconstruction: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Soterios Gyftopoulos; Avner Yemin; Thomas Mulholland; Michael Bloom; Pippa Storey; Christian Geppert; Michael P Recht
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability.

Authors:  Stephen S Burkhart; Joe F Debeer; Armin M Tehrany; Peter M Parten
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Efficacy of diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging for articular cartilage lesions of the glenohumeral joint in patients with instability.

Authors:  Meredith L Hayes; Mark S Collins; Joseph A Morgan; Doris E Wenger; Diane L Dahm
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Glenoid bone lesions: comparison between 3D VIBE images in MR arthrography and nonarthrographic MSCT.

Authors:  Chun-Yan Tian; Yao Shang; Zhuo-Zhao Zheng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Measurement of glenoid bone loss: a comparison of measurement error between 45 degrees and 0 degrees bone loss models and with different posterior arthroscopy portal locations.

Authors:  Matthew T Provencher; Alvin J Detterline; Neil Ghodadra; Anthony A Romeo; Bernard R Bach; Brian J Cole; Nikhil Verma
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  13 in total

1.  Simulated radiographic bone and joint modeling from 3D ankle MRI: feasibility and comparison with radiographs and 2D MRI.

Authors:  Shaun M Nordeck; Conrad E Koerper; Aaron Adler; Vidur Malhotra; Yin Xi; George T Liu; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Management of Glenoid Bone Loss with Anterior Shoulder Instability: Indications and Outcomes.

Authors:  Justin Rabinowitz; Richard Friedman; Josef K Eichinger
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

3.  3D-MR vs. 3D-CT of the shoulder in patients with glenohumeral instability.

Authors:  Laurence Stillwater; James Koenig; Bruce Maycher; Michael Davidson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Feasibility of using an inversion-recovery ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence for quantification of glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Ya-Jun Ma; Justin West; Amin Nazaran; Xin Cheng; Heinz Hoenecke; Jiang Du; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability: the quantification of glenoid bone loss using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Patrícia Martins e Souza; Bruno Lobo Brandão; Eduardo Brown; Geraldo Motta; Martim Monteiro; Edson Marchiori
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Estimation of anterior glenoid bone loss area using the ratio of bone defect length to the distance from posterior glenoid rim to the centre of the glenoid.

Authors:  Sang-Jin Shin; Bong Jae Jun; Young Won Koh; Michelle H McGarry; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Understanding the Hill-Sachs Lesion in Its Role in Patients with Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Jake A Fox; Anthony Sanchez; Tyler J Zajac; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

Review 8.  [Current concepts of diagnostic techniques and measurement methods for bone defect in patient with anterior shoulder instability].

Authors:  Zhengfeng Pan; Fuguo Huang; Jian Li; Xin Tang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-06-15

9.  Three-dimensional MRI Bone Models of the Glenohumeral Joint Using Deep Learning: Evaluation of Normal Anatomy and Glenoid Bone Loss.

Authors:  Tatiane Cantarelli Rodrigues; Cem M Deniz; Erin F Alaia; Natalia Gorelik; James S Babb; Jared Dublin; Soterios Gyftopoulos
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-09-09

10.  Three-Dimensional Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability: The Anatomic Concave Surface Area Method.

Authors:  Marine Launay; Muhammad Naghman Choudhry; Nicholas Green; Jashint Maharaj; Kenneth Cutbush; Peter Pivonka; Ashish Gupta
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.