Literature DB >> 2431769

Dose-response studies on the effects of alpha-, beta-, and gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane on putative preneoplastic foci, monooxygenases, and growth in rat liver.

C Schröter, W Parzefall, H Schröter, R Schulte-Hermann.   

Abstract

Alpha-, beta-, and gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane (alpha-, beta-, gamma-HCH) isomers are widespread environmental pollutants; alpha-HCH can cause liver tumors in rats and mice. In the present study we have checked first the tumor-initiating activity of HCH using the appearance of phenotypically altered foci in female rat liver as an end point. Foci were identified by means of the gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) reaction and by morphological alterations. No evidence of initiating activity was found. Secondly, we have attempted to determine quantitatively the ability of HCH isomers to promote tumor development. For this purpose growth and phenotypic changes of foci were used as an end point. Rats received a single dose of N-nitrosomorpholine. Then five different doses of each HCH isomer or phenobarbital (PB) (as a positive control) were administered continuously via the diet for 4, 15, and 20 weeks. Both number and size of altered foci were enhanced by doses of 2 to 3 mg/kg or more of the three isomers; in addition, foci phenotypes showed a pronounced shift towards strong expression of GGT and sharp demarcation from the surrounding liver. Based on daily doses the three HCH isomers were approximately equipotent; based on concentrations in liver or adipose tissue, gamma-HCH was severalfold more effective than alpha- and beta-HCH. Thirdly, size and DNA and monooxygenase activities of the liver were determined. All three parameters were enhanced by HCH isomers and PB. However, no strict correlations were found. Rather, at the highest doses tested PB was the most effective inducer of monooxygenases, alpha-HCH was the most potent inducer of liver growth, and all three HCHs were more potent than PB as inducers of focal expansion. Thus, induction of liver growth appears to be associated with foci expansion (tumor promotion); however, neither liver growth nor monooxygenase induction can be used for quantitative predictions of foci expansion by chemical compounds. Finally, no-observed-effect levels were estimated for the parameters studied and are discussed in relation to human exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2431769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacotherapy of ectoparasitic infections.

Authors:  T C Roos; M Alam; S Roos; H F Merk; D R Bickers
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Family pesticide use and childhood brain cancer.

Authors:  J R Davis; R C Brownson; R Garcia; B J Bentz; A Turner
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Association of arsenic-induced malignant transformation with DNA hypomethylation and aberrant gene expression.

Authors:  C Q Zhao; M R Young; B A Diwan; T P Coogan; M P Waalkes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Arsenic: opportunity for risk assessment.

Authors:  G Stöhrer
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Inhibitory effects of S-methylcysteine and cysteine on the promoting potential of sodium phenobarbital on rat liver carcinogenesis.

Authors:  M Vijayaraghavan; H Wanibuchi; N Takada; Y Yano; S Otani; S Yamamoto; S Fukushima
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  2000-08

Review 6.  Dose-response relationship in multistage carcinogenesis: promoters.

Authors:  K T Kitchin; J L Brown; R W Setzer
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.