Literature DB >> 8187717

Dose-response relationship in multistage carcinogenesis: promoters.

K T Kitchin1, J L Brown, R W Setzer.   

Abstract

Published dose-response curves of promoters of multistage carcinogenesis were selected that met the combined criteria of long study times, multiple doses, and low doses. In rat liver, 12 dose-response studies of 7 different promoters (phenobarbital, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin [TCDD], clophen A-50 (a polychlorinated biphenyl), alpha-, beta-, and gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane [HCH], and chloroform) were selected. These promoters were studied for 7-86 weeks and either altered hepatic foci or hepatic cancer were determined. The doses ranged from 1 ng (TCDD) to 400 mg (chloroform). In mouse skin, 10 dose-response studies of 4 promoters (12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate [TPA], anthralin, chrysarobin, and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroperoxyl-2,5-cyclohexadienone [BHTOOH]) were selected. In these mouse skin studies the doses ranged from 0.425 nmole (TPA) to 20,000 nmole (BHTOOH) per mouse. The length of time promoters were applied to the skin varied between 15 and 60 weeks. Either skin papillomas or carcinomas were determined. The dose-response relationships are presented on the basis of moles of promoter, percentage of the fully effective promoting dose, or percentage of the acute oral rat LD50. The degree of concavity of the dose-response curves was determined. The available dose-response data are critiqued and discussed on the basis of future research needs for biologically based cancer risk assessment models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8187717      PMCID: PMC1566890          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.94102s1255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  20 in total

Review 1.  Carcinogenesis modeling: from molecular biology to epidemiology.

Authors:  S H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Drugs and environmental chemicals as promoters.

Authors:  H Greim; E Deml; D Oesterle
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1984

Review 3.  Quantitative aspects of drug-mediated tumour promotion in liver and its toxicological implications.

Authors:  W Kunz; G Schaude; M Schwarz; H Tennekes
Journal:  Carcinog Compr Surv       Date:  1982

4.  Dose-dependent promoting activity of chloroform in rat liver foci bioassay.

Authors:  E Deml; D Oesterle
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  Dose-response relationship of phenobarbital promotion of diethylnitrosamine initiated tumors in rat liver.

Authors:  M A Pereira; S L Herren-Freund; R E Long
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Dose-dependent promoting effect of polychlorinated biphenyls on enzyme-altered islands in livers of adult and weanling rats.

Authors:  D Oesterle; E Deml
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) effects on hepatic microsomal cytochrome P-448-mediated enzyme activities.

Authors:  K T Kitchin; J S Woods
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1979-03-15       Impact factor: 4.219

8.  Dose-response relationship for phenobarbitone promotion of liver tumours initiated by single dose dimethylnitrosamine.

Authors:  H E Driver; A E McLean
Journal:  Br J Exp Pathol       Date:  1986-02

9.  Evidence for a common genetic pathway controlling susceptibility to mouse skin tumor promotion by diverse classes of promoting agents.

Authors:  J DiGiovanni; S C Walker; L Beltran; M Naito; W C Eastin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Mechanism of mouse skin tumor promotion by chrysarobin.

Authors:  J DiGiovanni; P C Decina; W P Prichett; J Cantor; K K Aalfs; M M Coombs
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  1 in total

1.  AP-1, NF-kappa-B, and ERK activation thresholds for promotion of neoplastic transformation in the mouse epidermal JB6 model.

Authors:  Kazumi Suzukawa; Thomas J Weber; Nancy H Colburn
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.031

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.