Literature DB >> 24317335

Ultrashort echo time MRI of pulmonary water content: assessment in a sponge phantom at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla.

Francesco Molinari1, Ananth J Madhuranthakam, Robert Lenkinski, Alexander A Bankier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to develop a predictive model for lung water content using ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a sponge phantom.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Image quality was preliminarily optimized, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of UTE was compared with that obtained from a three-dimensional fast gradient echo (FGRE) sequence. Four predetermined volumes of water (3.5, 3.0, 2.5, and 2.0 mL) were soaked in cellulose foam sponges 1.8 cm3 in size and were imaged with UTE-MRI at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla (T). A multiple echo time experiment (range, 0.1-9.6 ms) was conducted, and the T2 signal decay curve was determined at each volume of water. A three-parameter equation was fitted to the measured signal, allowing for the calculation of proton density and T2*. The calculation error of proton density was determined as a function of echo time. The constants that allowed for the determination of unknown volumes of water from the measured proton density were calculated using linear regression.
RESULTS: UTE-MRI provided excellent image quality for the four phantoms and showed a higher SNR, compared to that of FGRE. Proton density decreased proportionally with the decreases in both lung water and field strength (from 3.5 to 2.0 mL; proton density range at 1.5 T, 30.5-17.3; at 3.0 T, 84.2-41.5). Minimum echo time less than 0.6 ms at 1.5 T and 1 ms at 3.0 T maintained calculation errors for proton density within the range of 0%-10%. The slopes of the lines for determining the unknown volumes of water with UTE-MRI were 0.12±0.003 at 1.5 T and 0.05±0.002 at 3.0 T (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: In a sponge phantom imaged at 1.5 and 3.0 T, unknown volumes of water can be predicted with high accuracy using UTE-MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24317335      PMCID: PMC4463248          DOI: 10.5152/dir.2013.13232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  30 in total

1.  Reconstructing MR images from undersampled data: data-weighting considerations.

Authors:  J G Pipe
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Respiratory mechanics and fluid dynamics after lung resection surgery.

Authors:  Giuseppe Miserocchi; Egidio Beretta; Ilaria Rivolta
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.750

Review 3.  Clinical ultrashort echo time imaging of bone and other connective tissues.

Authors:  Matthew D Robson; Graeme M Bydder
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Short data-acquisition times improve projection images of lung tissue.

Authors:  Dean O Kuethe; Natalie L Adolphi; Eiichi Fukushima
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  MR imaging of the chest: a practical approach at 1.5T.

Authors:  M Puderbach; C Hintze; S Ley; M Eichinger; H-U Kauczor; J Biederer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Ultra-short echo time (UTE) MR imaging of the lung: comparison between normal and emphysematous lungs in mutant mice.

Authors:  Masaya Takahashi; Osamu Togao; Makoto Obara; Marc van Cauteren; Yoshiharu Ohno; Shigehiro Doi; Makoto Kuro-o; Craig Malloy; Connie C Hsia; Ivan Dimitrov
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  MRI of the lung: state of the art.

Authors:  Mark Wielpütz; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  The fractional error as a means of assessing agreement between two methods measuring the same variable.

Authors:  A H Tzamaloukas; J E Jackson; D A Long
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Radiation dose management in thoracic CT: an international survey.

Authors:  Francesco Molinari; Denis M Tack; Philip Boiselle; Long Ngo; Christina Mueller-Mang; Diana Litmanovich; Alexander A Bankier
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

10.  Extravascular lung water in acute respiratory distress syndrome: potential clinical value, assumptions and limitations.

Authors:  Luigi Camporota; Mark De Neef; Richard Beale
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  5 in total

1.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Environment.

Authors:  Laura L Walkup; Jean A Tkach; Nara S Higano; Robert P Thomen; Sean B Fain; Stephanie L Merhar; Robert J Fleck; Raouf S Amin; Jason C Woods
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11-15       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  A Lung Phantom Model to Study Pulmonary Edema Using Lung Ultrasound Surface Wave Elastography.

Authors:  Jinling Zhou; Xiaoming Zhang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Effect of a Thin Fluid Layer on Surface Wave Speed Measurements: A Lung Phantom Study.

Authors:  Jinling Zhou; Xiaoming Zhang
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Measuring lung water adds prognostic value in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Bruno M L Rocha; Gonçalo J L Cunha; Pedro Freitas; Pedro M D Lopes; Ana C Santos; Sara Guerreiro; António Tralhão; António Ventosa; Maria J Andrade; João Abecasis; Carlos Aguiar; Carla Saraiva; Miguel Mendes; António M Ferreira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  An Inhalable Theranostic System for Local Tuberculosis Treatment Containing an Isoniazid Loaded Metal Organic Framework Fe-MIL-101-NH2-From Raw MOF to Drug Delivery System.

Authors:  Gabriela Wyszogrodzka-Gaweł; Przemysław Dorożyński; Stefano Giovagnoli; Weronika Strzempek; Edyta Pesta; Władysław P Węglarz; Barbara Gil; Elżbieta Menaszek; Piotr Kulinowski
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 6.321

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.