Literature DB >> 24317016

Effect of leukemia inhibitory factor and forskolin on establishment of rat embryonic stem cell lines.

Masumi Hirabayashi1, Teppei Goto, Chihiro Tamura, Makoto Sanbo, Hiromasa Hara, Shinichi Hochi.   

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate whether supplementation of 2i medium with leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and/or forskolin would support establishment of germline-competent rat embryonic stem (ES) cell lines. Due to the higher likelihood of outgrowth rates, supplementation of forskolin with or without LIF contributed to the higher establishment efficiency of ES cell lines in the WDB strain. Germline transmission competency of the chimeric rats was not influenced by the profile of ES cell lines until their establishment. When the LIF/forskolin-supplemented 2i medium was used, the rat strain used as the blastocyst donor, such as the WI strain, was a possible factor negatively influencing the establishment efficiency of ES cell lines. Once ES cell lines were established, all lines were found to be germline-competent by a progeny test in chimeric rats. In conclusion, both LIF and forskolin are not essential but can play a beneficial role in the establishment of "genuine" rat ES cell lines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24317016      PMCID: PMC3958585          DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2013-109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Dev        ISSN: 0916-8818            Impact factor:   2.214


Rat embryonic stem (ES) cell lines have been established by using a few inhibitors for fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor, mitogen activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) in differentiation-related signaling pathways [1, 2]. This protocol (3i system) and modified protocol without an inhibitor for the FGF receptor (2i system) were found to be reproducible in establishing rat ES cell lines [3,4,5,6]. However, it remains unclear which additional supplements are essential or useful for the establishment of germline-competent (= genuine) rat ES cell lines. Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is known to be an essential supplement for establishment of mouse ES cell lines in the classical culture protocol. Establishment of rat ES cell lines has been reported in the presence of LIF [1, 3, 4, 7,8,9] or absence of LIF [2, 5, 6, 10] under either the 2i or 3i system with various rat strains. An inhibitor for Rho-associated coiled-coil kinase (ROCK) and rat serum have been supplemented to LIF-free 2i culture medium for establishment of rat ES cell lines [5]. Forskolin, an well-known adenylate cyclase stimulator [11], has been used to facilitate establishment of ES cell lines in humans [12] and pigs [13]; the ES cell colonies appeared to be naïve, with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ES cells. We have recently reported that establishment of germline-competent ES cells from a homozygous CAG/Venus transgenic rat line was possible only when both LIF and forskolin were supplemented into the 2i culture medium [14], but the experimental scale was too small to lead a certain conclusion. Thus, a systematic experimental design would be required to analyze the substantial importance of these supplements in establishment of germline-competent rat ES cell lines. An experiment was conducted to investigate whether supplementation of 2i medium with LIF and/or forskolin could support establishment of germline-competent rat ES cell lines in a 2 x 2 factorial design. The establishment efficiency of ES cell lines in the WDB rat strain was significantly increased by forskolin supplementation (88–94% vs. 50% in 2i medium alone; Table 1), probably due to the higher likelihood of outgrowth rate in forskolin-supplemented medium (88–94% vs. 62% in 2i medium alone). No obvious difference in the morphology of the ES cell colonies was detected among the 4 groups. Establishment efficiencies of rat ES cell lines reported so far have been variable, such as 23–70% and 16–79% in LIF-supplemented 2i medium [1, 7,8,9, 15, 16] and LIF-free 2i medium [2, 5, 10], respectively. No difference in gender ratio (male:female) of the established ES cell lines was found among the 4 groups (3:10, 5:8, 5:4 and 6:5 in the no supplement group, LIF group, forskolin group and LIF/forskolin group, respectively).
Table 1.

Establishment of rat ES cell lines in 2i medium supplemented with LIF and/or forskolin

LIFForskolinBlastocysts seededBlastocysts outgrown (%)ES cell lines established (%)
2616 (62) a13 (50) a
+1715 (88) ab13 (76) ab
+1614 (88) ab14 (88) b
++1716 (94) b16 (94) b

a,b Different superscripts denote significant differences within columns (P<0.05).

a,b Different superscripts denote significant differences within columns (P<0.05). To facilitate analysis of germline-transmission competency of the ES cell lines, only the ES cell lines with male gender (3 each) were used for production of chimeric rats. During the process of chimeric rat production, a significantly lower offspring rate from ES-cell-injected blastocysts was noted in the LIF/forskolin group when compared with the other 3 groups (15–31% vs. 35–82%; P<0.05, Table 2), but the overall efficiency of producing chimeric rats was comparable among the 4 groups. Male chimeric rats with a relatively high contribution of the WDB characteristics in coat color have been preferentially used for progeny test [14]. However in the present study, all surviving chimeric male rats with chimerism of 5-95% in coat color were used for analysis of germline transmission (see Supplementary Fig. 1).
Table 2.

Production of chimeric rats with ES cells and their ability for germline transmission

Germline transmission competency of the chimeric rats (67–100% of cell lines analyzed) was not affected by the profile of ES cell lines until their establishment (Table 2). Individual data concerning the proportion of ES rats per G1 offspring were uploaded as supplementary data (see Supplementary Table 1: available online). An earlier report [1] described the low germline competence of rat ES cells established in LIF-supplemented 2i medium (25%), while recent studies [7, 9] indicated that high frequencies of rat ES cell lines established in LIF-supplemented 2i medium were germline-competent (71–80%). It has been reported that forskolin is effective in improving the baseline level of pluripotency in human and porcine ES cells [12, 13]. In addition, the limited capacity of rabbit induced-pluripotent stem cells to differentiate into glial oligodendrocytes has been overcome by converting the stem cells to a naïve state with forskolin [17]. Although no parameters for growth rate in cultures were investigated in the present study, both rat LIF and forskolin may be useful in stimulating self-renewal of naïve stem cells. RT-PCR analysis indicated that stem cell markers such as Oct-4, rNanog, Fgf-4 and Rex-1 were expressed in all 12 rat ES cell lines examined (Fig. 1). Even ES cell lines that are not germline-competent (ID: B-3 and C-2) have been shown to express these genes at comparable levels in the other lines, suggesting that expression of the stem cell markers is not a useful parameter to predict the germline competency of rat ES cell lines. Weak expression of Gata6 was detected in all the rat ES cell lines, as a certain expression of Gata6 has been reported in rat ES cells [1, 18]. In addition, all the rat ES cells expressed the Cdx2 gene, as reported in genuine rat ES cells [8]. The expression of Gata6 and Cdx2 may be a unique characteristic of the rat ES cells.
Fig. 1.

RT-PCR analysis of 12 rat ES cell lines. Rat embryonic fibroblasts at E14.5 (rEF) serve as the negative control for stem cell markers. As for expression of Cdx2, colons from day 2 rat offspring and rEF are used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The IDs of the ES cell lines correspond to those in Table 2.

RT-PCR analysis of 12 rat ES cell lines. Rat embryonic fibroblasts at E14.5 (rEF) serve as the negative control for stem cell markers. As for expression of Cdx2, colons from day 2 rat offspring and rEF are used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The IDs of the ES cell lines correspond to those in Table 2. An additional experiment was conducted to investigate whether four different rat strains (WDB and WI with or without gene modification) influence to the establishment efficiency of ES cell lines. The Wistar strain is the most conventionally used rat strain (closed colony) in the field of neuroscience, but it is a minor strain in stem cell research. When the LIF/forskolin-supplemented 2i medium was used for culture of blastocysts, rat strains such as the WI strain were less effective than the WDB strain in terms of establishment efficiency (59 vs. 94%; Table 3). Gene modification itself seemed not to be a negative factor for the establishment efficiency, but it is impossible to emphasize the above description as a general conclusion because of the limited number of transgenic strains tested here. Once ES cell lines were established, all lines (100%, 7/7 in overall) were found to be germline-competent by a progeny test in chimeric rats. Efficiency of producing chimeric rats by blastocyst injection of the ES cells varied among the rat strains (6–33% in overall; Table 3). The combination of the genetic background of the ES cells and the host blastocysts has been demonstrated to be a critical factor affecting the efficiency of producing chimeric rats and the germline competency of the ES cells [19].
Table 3.

Effect of rat strain on ES cell derivation in LIF/forskolin-supplemented 2i medium

Strain (Origin)BlastocystsES cell linesProfiles for chimera production and progeny test
SeededOutgrown (%)Established (%)Analyzed for GTGenuine (%)ES cell line IDInjectedPups born (%)Chimeras (%)AnalyzedGT positive (%)
WDB*1716 (94) b16 (94) b33 (100)D-1467 (15)5 (71)11 (100)
D-2486 (13)5 (83)11 (100)
D-34815 (31)10 (67)63 (50)
WI1710 (59) ab10 (59) ab22 (100)E-13514 (40)6 (43)22 (100)
E-2333 (9)2 (67)11 (100)
CAG/Venus Tg (WI)198 (42) a8 (42) a11 (100)F-15117 (33)17 (100)31 (33)
RT2 (WDB)87 (88) b7 (88) b11 (100)G-16323 (37)16 (70)82 (25)

GT: Germline transmission. * Data for WDB are derived from Table 1 and Table 2 (D-1 to -3). a,b Different superscripts denote significant differences within columns (P<0.05).

GT: Germline transmission. * Data for WDB are derived from Table 1 and Table 2 (D-1 to -3). a,b Different superscripts denote significant differences within columns (P<0.05). It is concluded that both LIF and forskolin are not essential but can play a beneficial role in the establishment of “genuine” rat ES cell lines.

Methods

Animals

All procedures for the animal experiment were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan. Specific pathogen-free rats were purchased from Charles River Laboratories Japan (Kanagawa, Japan). All rats were housed in an environmentally controlled room with a 12-h dark/12-h light cycle at a temperature of 23 ± 2 C and humidity of 55 ± 5% and were given free access to a laboratory diet (CE-2; CLEA Japan, Tokyo, Japan) and filtered water. Black coat color was used to identify WDB (A rat strain “BLK” which we described in previous papers [14, 20, 21] has been renamed “WDB/Nips” and registered to Rat Genome Database, http://rgd.mcw.edu/wg/home, with the RGD ID 7411634). A homozygous CAG/Venus transgenic rat strain, generated with the Crlj:WI background [14], was named “CAG/Venus Tg (WI).” A knock-in rat strain, generated with ES cells originating from the WDB strain [21], was named “RT2 (WDB)”.

Establishment of ES cells

Blastocysts at E4.5 (Fig. 2A) were harvested and freed from their zonae pellucidae. The zona-free blastocysts (Fig. 2B) were cultured for 7 days in (1) 2i medium consisting of 1 µM MEK inhibitor (PD0325901; Stemgent, Cambridge, MA, USA) and 3 µM GSK3 inhibitor (CHIR99021; Axon Medchem BV, Groningen, Netherlands) in N2B27 medium [22], (2) 2i medium with 1,000 U/ml rat LIF (ESGRO®; Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), (3) 2i medium with 10 µM forskolin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and (4) 2i medium with 1,000 U/ml rat LIF and 10 µM forskolin on a feeder layer of mitomycin C-treated mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Outgrowths from the blastocysts (Fig. 2C) were disaggregated and transferred to new culture vessels containing the same culture medium (passage-1; P1). These tentative ES cell lines (Fig. 2D) were maintained by medium exchange every other day and trypsinization/expansion every three days (P2 plus). Gender of the ES cell lines was determined by PCR amplification of the rat Y chromosome-specific Sry gene using a REDExtract-N-Amp kit (Sigma-Aldrich). A 104-bp fragment of the rat Sry gene was amplified by 1 cycle for 3 min at 94 C; 38 cycles for 30 sec at 94 C, 30 sec at 55 C and 30 sec at 72 C; and 1 cycle for 10 min at 72 C with a primer pair of Sry-F (5’-CAT CGA AGG GTT AAA GTG CCA-3’) and Sry-R (5’-ATA GTG TGT AGG TTG TTG TCC-3’).
Fig. 2.

(A) Rat blastocyst at E4.5. (B) Zona-free blastocyst seeded onto mouse embryonic fibroblasts. (C) Outgrowth of blastocyst after 5 days of culture. (D) ES cell colonies 2 days after 3rd passage. Scale bars: 100 µm.

(A) Rat blastocyst at E4.5. (B) Zona-free blastocyst seeded onto mouse embryonic fibroblasts. (C) Outgrowth of blastocyst after 5 days of culture. (D) ES cell colonies 2 days after 3rd passage. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Expression of stem cell marker genes

The expression of stem cell marker genes (Oct-4, rNanog, Fgf-4 and Rex-1), a trophectoderm-specific marker gene (Cdx2) and reference genes (Gata6 and β-actin) was examined by RT-PCR analysis. The primer sets used were the same as those described in our recent publication [23]. Briefly, total RNA was extracted from each sample using a RNeasy® Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). The cDNA was prepared using a Superscript™ III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and amplified with TaKaRa LA Taq® (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) by 30 cycles at 95 C for 30 sec, at 55 C (or 60 C in case of rNanog and Gata6) for 30 sec and at 72 C for 60 sec.

Germline transmission

The potential of each ES cell line for germline transmission was examined by the conventional approach using G1 generation offspring via chimeric rats [3]. Chimeric rats were prepared by microinjection of 10–15 cells from each ES cell line at P5-19 into the blastocoel cavity of WI E4.5 blastocysts, as described previously [18]. When the albino WI-derived ES cells (without fluorescent markers) were used, the host blastocysts were from the WDB female rats. All chimeric male rats that could develop to adulthood were used for the progeny test. Contribution of the ES cells in the resultant offspring was confirmed by their coat color. When germline-competent G1 offspring were not obtained, the progeny test was terminated with the negative data from at least 5 chimeric rats per ES cell line and 4 litters per chimeric rat.

Statistics

Data regarding the outgrowth rate and the establishment efficiency at P5 were analyzed by Fisher’s exact probability test using js-STAR 2012, a program available online (http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/Index.html). Percentage data regarding the full-term development of ES cell-injected blastocysts, chimeric rat production and germline-competent chimeras were arcsine transformed and analyzed by Fisher’s least significant difference test after one-way ANOVA. A value of P<0.05 was chosen as an indication of statistical significance.
  22 in total

1.  Derivation of rat embryonic stem cells and generation of protease-activated receptor-2 knockout rats.

Authors:  Satoshi Yamamoto; Mitsugu Nakata; Reiko Sasada; Yuki Ooshima; Takashi Yano; Tadahiro Shinozawa; Yasuhiro Tsukimi; Michiyasu Takeyama; Yoshio Matsumoto; Tadatoshi Hashimoto
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Naive-like conversion overcomes the limited differentiation capacity of induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Arata Honda; Masanori Hatori; Michiko Hirose; Chizumi Honda; Haruna Izu; Kimiko Inoue; Ryutaro Hirasawa; Shogo Matoba; Sumie Togayachi; Hiroyuki Miyoshi; Atsuo Ogura
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Derivation of embryonic stem cell lines from parthenogenetically developing rat blastocysts.

Authors:  Masumi Hirabayashi; Teppei Goto; Chihiro Tamura; Makoto Sanbo; Hiromasa Hara; Megumi Kato-Itoh; Hideyuki Sato; Toshihiro Kobayashi; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Shinichi Hochi
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  Cytosolic adenylyl cyclase defines a unique signaling molecule in mammals.

Authors:  J Buck; M L Sinclair; L Schapal; M J Cann; L R Levin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A retrospective analysis of germline competence in rat embryonic stem cell lines.

Authors:  Masumi Hirabayashi; Chihiro Tamura; Makoto Sanbo; Megumi Kato-Itoh; Toshihiro Kobayashi; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Shinichi Hochi
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Generation of naive-like porcine-induced pluripotent stem cells capable of contributing to embryonic and fetal development.

Authors:  Shuh-hei Fujishiro; Kazuaki Nakano; Yoshihisa Mizukami; Takuya Azami; Yoshikazu Arai; Hitomi Matsunari; Rikiya Ishino; Takashi Nishimura; Masahito Watanabe; Tomoyuki Abe; Yutaka Furukawa; Kazuhiro Umeyama; Shinya Yamanaka; Masatsugu Ema; Hiroshi Nagashima; Yutaka Hanazono
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.272

7.  Generation of genetically modified rats from embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Masaki Kawamata; Takahiro Ochiya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Germline competent embryonic stem cells derived from rat blastocysts.

Authors:  Ping Li; Chang Tong; Ruty Mehrian-Shai; Li Jia; Nancy Wu; Youzhen Yan; Robert E Maxson; Eric N Schulze; Houyan Song; Chih-Lin Hsieh; Martin F Pera; Qi-Long Ying
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Capture of authentic embryonic stem cells from rat blastocysts.

Authors:  Mia Buehr; Stephen Meek; Kate Blair; Jian Yang; Janice Ure; Jose Silva; Renee McLay; John Hall; Qi-Long Ying; Austin Smith
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Identification of rat Rosa26 locus enables generation of knock-in rat lines ubiquitously expressing tdTomato.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kobayashi; Megumi Kato-Itoh; Tomoyuki Yamaguchi; Chihiro Tamura; Makoto Sanbo; Masumi Hirabayashi; Hiromitsu Nakauchi
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing in the rat via direct injection of one-cell embryos.

Authors:  Yanjiao Shao; Yuting Guan; Liren Wang; Zhongwei Qiu; Meizhen Liu; Yuting Chen; Lijuan Wu; Yongmei Li; Xueyun Ma; Mingyao Liu; Dali Li
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Haploid embryonic stem cell lines derived from androgenetic and parthenogenetic rat blastocysts.

Authors:  Masumi Hirabayashi; Hiromasa Hara; Teppei Goto; Akiko Takizawa; Melinda R Dwinell; Takahiro Yamanaka; Shinichi Hochi; Hiromitsu Nakauchi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Gene Editing in Rat Embryonic Stem Cells to Produce In Vitro Models and In Vivo Reporters.

Authors:  Yaoyao Chen; Sonia Spitzer; Sylvia Agathou; Ragnhildur Thora Karadottir; Austin Smith
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 7.765

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.