Literature DB >> 24316232

ACR appropriateness criteria asymptomatic patient at risk for coronary artery disease.

James P Earls1, Pamela K Woodard2, Suhny Abbara3, Scott R Akers4, Philip A Araoz5, Kristopher Cummings2, Ricardo C Cury6, Sharmila Dorbala7, Udo Hoffmann8, Joe Y Hsu9, Jill E Jacobs10, James K Min11.   

Abstract

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death for both men and women in the United States. Coronary artery disease has a long asymptomatic latent period and early targeted preventive measures can reduce mortality and morbidity. It is important to accurately classify individuals at elevated risk in order to identify those who might benefit from early intervention. Imaging advances have made it possible to detect subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. Coronary artery calcium score correlates closely with overall atherosclerotic burden and provides useful prognostic information for patient management. Our purpose is to discuss use of diagnostic imaging in asymptomatic patients at elevated risk for future cardiovascular events. The goal for these patients is to further refine targeted preventative efforts based on risk. The following imaging modalities are available for evaluating asymptomatic patients at elevated risk: radiography, fluoroscopy, multidetector CT, ultrasound, MRI, cardiac perfusion scintigraphy, echocardiography, and PET. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appropriateness criteria; asymptomatic; coronary artery calcium score; coronary artery disease; multidetector CT (MDCT)

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24316232     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  11 in total

1.  Comparing two methods for determining appropriateness of myocardial perfusion imaging: Criteria from the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Anastasiya Bagrova; Ali Y Alsamarah; David E Winchester
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Risk Stratification for Primary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease: Roles of C-Reactive Protein and Coronary Artery Calcium.

Authors:  Waqas T Qureshi; Jamal S Rana; Joseph Yeboah; Usama Bin Nasir; Mouaz H Al-Mallah
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Trends in Cardiovascular MRI and CT in the U.S. Medicare Population from 2012 to 2017.

Authors:  James W Goldfarb; Jonathan Weber
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2021-02-25

Review 4.  Management of Coronary Artery Calcium and Coronary CTA Findings.

Authors:  Dustin M Thomas; Sanjay Divakaran; Todd C Villines; Khurram Nasir; Nishant R Shah; Ahmad M Slim; Ron Blankstein; Michael K Cheezum
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2015

Review 5.  Cardiovascular Imaging for the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Events.

Authors:  Lauren A Weber; Michael K Cheezum; Jason M Reese; Alison B Lane; Ryan D Haley; Meredith W Lutz; Todd C Villines
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2015

6.  Brazilian adult individuals with untreated isolated GH deficiency do not have accelerated subclinical atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Ursula M M Costa; Carla R P Oliveira; Roberto Salvatori; José A S Barreto-Filho; Viviane C Campos; Francielle T Oliveira; Ivina E S Rocha; Joselina L M Oliveira; Wersley A Silva; Manuel H Aguiar-Oliveira
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.335

Review 7.  Coronary artery calcium score: current status.

Authors:  Priscilla Ornellas Neves; Joalbo Andrade; Henry Monção
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2017 May-Jun

8.  Inter-observer agreement of the Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADSTM) in patients with stable chest pain.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Mohamed Magdy Elrakhawy; Mahmoud Mohamed Yossof; Hadeer Mohamed Nageb
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-16

9.  The influence of patient race on the use of diagnostic imaging in United States emergency departments: data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care survey.

Authors:  Andrew B Ross; Vivek Kalia; Brian Y Chan; Geng Li
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Automated coronary calcium scoring using deep learning with multicenter external validation.

Authors:  David Eng; Christopher Chute; Nishith Khandwala; Pranav Rajpurkar; Jin Long; Sam Shleifer; Mohamed H Khalaf; Alexander T Sandhu; Fatima Rodriguez; David J Maron; Saeed Seyyedi; Daniele Marin; Ilana Golub; Matthew Budoff; Felipe Kitamura; Marcelo Straus Takahashi; Ross W Filice; Rajesh Shah; John Mongan; Kimberly Kallianos; Curtis P Langlotz; Matthew P Lungren; Andrew Y Ng; Bhavik N Patel
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.