Literature DB >> 24315305

Relationship of chronic histologic prostatic inflammation in biopsy specimens with serum isoform [-2]proPSA (p2PSA), %p2PSA, and prostate health index in men with a total prostate-specific antigen of 4-10 ng/ml and normal digital rectal examination.

Massimo Lazzeri1, Alberto Abrate2, Giovanni Lughezzani1, Giulio Maria Gadda1, Massimo Freschi3, Francesco Mistretta1, Giuliana Lista1, Nicola Fossati1, Alessandro Larcher1, Ella Kinzikeeva1, Nicolòmaria Buffi1, Vincenzo Dell'Acqua1, Vittorio Bini4, Francesco Montorsi1, Giorgio Guazzoni1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between serum [-2]proPSA (p2PSA) and derivatives with chronic histologic prostatic inflammation (CHPI) in men undergoing prostate biopsy for suspected prostate cancer (PCa).
METHODS: This nested case-control study resulted from an observational prospective trial for the definition of sensibility, specificity, and accuracy of p2PSA, %p2PSA, and Beckman Coulter Prostate Health Index (PHI), in men undergoing prostate biopsy, with a total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 4-10 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination. CHPI was the outcome of interest and defined as the presence of moderate to large infiltration of lymphomononuclear cells with interstitial and/or glandular disruption in absence of PCa. p2PSA, %p2PSA, and PHI were considered the index tests and compared with the established biomarker reference standard tests: tPSA, fPSA, %fPSA.
RESULTS: Of 267 patients subjected to prostate biopsy, 73 (27.3%) patients were diagnosed with CHPI. Comparing CHPI with PCa patients, %p2PSA and PHI were found to be significantly lower, whereas fPSA and %fPSA were significantly higher. %p2PSA and PHI were the most accurate predictors of CHPI at biopsy, significantly outperforming tPSA, fPSA, and %fPSA. On the contrary, no significant differences were found in PSA, p2PSA, and derivatives between CHPI and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients.
CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that p2PSA, %p2PSA, and PHI values might discriminate PCa from CHPI or BPH, but not CHPI from BPH, in men with a total PSA 4-10 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination. p2PSA isoform and its derivatives could be useful in clinical decision making to avoid unnecessary biopsies in patients with CHPI and elevated tPSA value.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24315305     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  18 in total

Review 1.  Serum markers in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Ola Bratt; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  High PCA3 scores in urine correlate with poor-prognosis factors in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Jiangyong Leng; Hongxiang Shao; Weidong Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  TMPRSS2-ERG fusion transcripts expression in patients referred for prostate biopsy: combining detection in urine and needle rinse material.

Authors:  Nicolas Barry Delongchamps; Patrick Younes; Lydie Denjean; Marc Zerbib; Phuong-Nhi Bories
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  PSA and beyond: alternative prostate cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Sharanjot Saini
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 5.  The role of biomarkers in the assessment of prostate cancer risk prior to prostate biopsy: which markers matter and how should they be used?

Authors:  Marianne Schmid; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Markus Graefen; Margit Fisch; Felix K Chun; Jens Hansen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Biomarkers in prostate cancer: what's new?

Authors:  David A Sartori; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.645

Review 7.  Biomarkers in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matteo Ferro; Carlo Buonerba; Daniela Terracciano; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Vincenzo Cosimato; Danilo Bottero; Victor M Deliu; Pasquale Ditonno; Sisto Perdonà; Riccardo Autorino; Ioman Coman; Sabino De Placido; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Ottavio De Cobelli
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 8.  Advances in urinary protein biomarkers for urogenital and non-urogenital pathologies.

Authors:  Johanna Pedroza-Díaz; Sarah Röthlisberger
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.313

9.  Development and external validation of a prostate health index-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Cheng-Tao Han; Gui-Ming Zhang; Fang Liu; Qiang Ding; Jian-Feng Xu; Adriana C Vidal; Stephen J Freedland; Chi-Fai Ng; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Developing a follow-up strategy for patients with PSA ranging from 4 to 10 ng/ml via a new model to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Ruizhe Zhao; Yuan Huang; Gong Cheng; Jinliang Liu; Pengfei Shao; Chao Qin; Lixin Hua; Changjun Yin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.