Literature DB >> 24313389

Assessment of residual setup errors for anatomical sub-structures in image-guided head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy.

Milos Djordjevic1, Emmelie Sjöholm, Owe Tullgren, Bruno Sorcini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To quantify residual setup errors (RSE) and required planning target volumes (PTV) margins in head-and-neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy when using daily image guidance (IG) and less-than-daily IG protocols.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Daily on-line kV-image registrations of 80 HNC patients (2640 imaged treatment fractions) were retrospectively studied to analyze RSE. Less-than-daily imaging protocols, using different action levels, were simulated on the data. To quantify local RSE; single rigid bony structures were defined as landmarks. The RSEs and required PTV margins were computed for each sub-structure with and without daily IG.
RESULTS: For less-than-daily IG protocols the setup accuracy was more dependent on frequent imaging throughout the treatment course than the number of initially imaged fractions. With daily IG the RSE of the sub-structures ranged from 0.6 mm to 2.3 mm (systematic) and from 1.0 mm to 1.7 mm (random). Required PTV margins for the sub-regions ranged from 4.5 mm to 9.3 mm with no IG and from 2.3 mm to 6.8 mm with daily IG.
CONCLUSION: Anatomical changes over the treatment course require frequent IG to achieve accurate dose delivery using highly conformal radiotherapy techniques. The current study shows that considerable local RSE may remain even with daily IGRT. The comprehension of local RSEs in HNC radiotherapy is important when designating PTV margins as well as tolerance levels for couch correction and plan adaption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24313389     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.862593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  9 in total

1.  Setup uncertainties and PTV margins at different anatomical levels in intensity modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Milan Anjanappa; Malu Rafi; Saju Bhasi; Rejnish Kumar; Kainickal Cessal Thommachan; Tapesh Bhattacharya; Kunnambath Ramadas
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-08-08

2.  Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image-guided radiotherapy protocols.

Authors:  Auwal Abubakar; Nada Alia M Zamri; Shazril Imran Shaukat; Hafiz Mohd Zin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Analyzing human decisions in IGRT of head-and-neck cancer patients to teach image registration algorithms what experts know.

Authors:  Eva Maria Stoiber; Nina Bougatf; Hendrik Teske; Christian Bierstedt; Dieter Oetzel; Jürgen Debus; Rolf Bendl; Kristina Giske
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Setup errors in patients with head-neck cancer (HNC), treated using the Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) technique: how it influences the customised immobilisation systems, patient's pain and anxiety.

Authors:  Massimiliano Contesini; Monica Guberti; Roberta Saccani; Luca Braglia; Cinzia Iotti; Andrea Botti; Emilio Abbati; Marina Iemmi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Analysis of which local set-up errors can be covered by a 5-mm margin for cone beam CT-guided radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Renming Zhong; Ying Song; Yuying Yan; Xuetao Wang; Shuai Li; Jidan Zhou; Xiaoyu Li; Sen Bai
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Assessment of the therapeutic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography-guided nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jiabin Liu; Khumbula Maitireazvo Lyman; Zhenhua Ding; Liang Zhou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Radiotherapy-Compatible Robotic System for Multi-Landmark Positioning in Head and Neck Cancer Treatments.

Authors:  Mark Ostyn; Siqiu Wang; Yun-Soung Kim; Siyong Kim; Woon-Hong Yeo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The Dosimetric Outcome of a Rotational Planning Target Volume in Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancers.

Authors:  Mona Arbab; Gregory Bartlett; Benjamin Dawson; Jeffrey Ge; Mark Langer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.733

9.  The effect of designing a rotational planning target volume on sparing pharyngeal constrictor muscles in patients with oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Mona Arbab; Huisi Ai; Gregory Bartlett; Benjamin Dawson; Mark Langer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.243

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.