| Literature DB >> 24312606 |
Andrew J Hardy1, Javier G P Gamarra, Dónall E Cross, Mark G Macklin, Mark W Smith, Japhet Kihonda, Gerry F Killeen, George N Ling'ala, Chris J Thomas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Larval source management is a promising component of integrated malaria control and elimination. This requires development of a framework to target productive locations through process-based understanding of habitat hydrology and geomorphology.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24312606 PMCID: PMC3849348 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081931
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Kilombero Valley study area.
The location of hydrological monitoring instruments is shown that recorded rainfall, river stage and water table depth over a 12 month period. Background elevation data is provided by the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) with a 90 m grid resolution.
Figure 2Diagram showing the different water body types.
Included is a description of the key hydrological processes taking place in the dry and wet seasons within each water type found in the Namwawala area, Kilombero Valley, southern Tanzania.
Figure 3Examples from each water body type.
The water body types were classified according to their geomorphological and hydrological characteristics. (A) Topographic convergence: saturated areas driven by topographic convergence of subsurface moisture; (B) Floodplain basins: depressions within floodplains of active river channels with well-developed levees; (C) Palaeochannels: associated with relict palaeochannel systems; (D) River channels: pools located in perennial or seasonally active river channels; and (E) Spring-fed pools.
Figure 4Larval sample locations categorised by water body type.
The background image was captured on 10th July 2001 by Landsat Thematic Mapper. The image is displayed as a false colour composite (red = band 7, green = band 5 and blue = band 4) with bright green indicating developing vegetation, dark green indicating mature or sparse vegetation, purple indicating bare soil and black representing water.
Total Anopheles species count gathered throughout the sampling period and relative proportions.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
|
| 503 | 25.2 |
|
| 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 |
|
| ||
|
| 37 | 1.9 |
|
| 1 | 0.1 |
|
| 0 | 0 |
|
| 12 | 0.6 |
|
| 0 | 0 |
|
| ||
|
| 1445 | 72.3 |
|
| 1998 | |
Figure 5Total monthly rainfall.
Rainfall was recorded using a network of eight tipping bucket rain gauges positioned throughout the study area. Historical mean (1969-2010) is calculated using rain gauge measurements recorded near the town of Ifakara located 30 km east of the study area.
Figure 8Contrasts in bootstrap estimated number of late-stage An. arabiensis larvae per dip using Method of Variance Estimates Recovery [67].
Black = significant difference (95% confidence), grey = no significant difference, blank = not available (due to absence of larvae in one or both habitat types). T = topographic convergence, F = floodplain basin, P = palaeochannel, R = river channel and S = spring-fed pond.
Correlation coefficients between the hydrometric data and area-weighted abundance estimate of late-stage An. arabiensis larvae per water body type.
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.62 | 0.97** | -0.7* | 0.58 | 0.48 | -0.39 | 0.03 | -0.08 | 0.16 | -0.06 | -0.57 | 0.39 |
|
| -0.99** | -0.25 | 0.1 | 0.24 | 0.78* | -0.42 | 0.53 | 0.29 | -0.3 | -0.25 | 0.03 | 0.06 |
|
| -0.46 | -0.47 | 0.59 | -0.47 | -0.28 | 0.25 | -0.33 | 0.05 | -0.14 | -0.02 | 0.64* | -0.56 |
|
| -0.28 | -0.05 | 0.11 | 0.08 | -0.07 | 0.15 | -0.09 | -0.19 | 0.26 | -0.3 | -0.15 | 0.27 |
|
| -0.17 | -0.2 | 0.33 | -0.05 | -0.27 | 0.11 | -0.29 | -0.11 | -0.02 | -0.05 | 0.61 | -0.47 |
|
| -0.35 | -0.29 | 0.41 | -0.09 | -0.23 | 0.14 | -0.26 | -0.07 | -0.01 | -0.12 | 0.52 | -0.41 |
Analysis carried out using Cross Correlation Functions. T = topographic convergence, F = floodplain basin, P = palaeochannel, R = river channel, S = spring-fed pond, WT = water table.Analysis carried out using Cross Correlation Functions.
Significant to Bonferroni adjusted confidence intervals at 99%** and 95%*.
Rain = rainfall, Stage = river level, WT = water table depth
T = topographic convergence, F = floodplain basin, P = palaeochannel, R = river channel, S = spring-fed pond, WT = water table.