Literature DB >> 22438864

Species shifts in the Anopheles gambiae complex: do LLINs successfully control Anopheles arabiensis?

Jovin Kitau1, Richard M Oxborough, Patrick K Tungu, Johnson Matowo, Robert C Malima, Stephen M Magesa, Jane Bruce, Franklin W Mosha, Mark W Rowland.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: High coverage of conventional and long-lasting insecticide treated nets (ITNs and LLINs) in parts of E Africa are associated with reductions in local malaria burdens. Shifts in malaria vector species ratio have coincided with the scale-up suggesting that some species are being controlled by ITNs/LLINs better than others.
METHODS: Between 2005-2006 six experimental hut trials of ITNs and LLINs were conducted in parallel at two field stations in northeastern Tanzania; the first station was in Lower Moshi Rice Irrigation Zone, an area where An. arabiensis predominates, and the second was in coastal Muheza, where An. gambiae and An. funestus predominate. Five pyrethroids and one carbamate insecticide were evaluated on nets in terms of insecticide-induced mortality, blood-feeding inhibition and exiting rates.
RESULTS: In the experimental hut trials mortality of An. arabiensis was consistently lower than that of An. gambiae and An. funestus. The mortality rates in trials with pyrethroid-treated nets ranged from 25-52% for An. arabiensis, 63-88% for An. gambiae s.s. and 53-78% for An. funestus. All pyrethroid-treated nets provided considerable protection for the occupants, despite being deliberately holed, with blood-feeding inhibition (percentage reduction in biting rates) being consistent between species. Veranda exiting rates did not differ between species. Percentage mortality of mosquitoes tested in cone bioassays on netting was similar for An. gambiae and An. arabiensis.
CONCLUSIONS: LLINs and ITNs treated with pyrethroids were more effective at killing An. gambiae and An. funestus than An. arabiensis. This could be a major contributing factor to the species shifts observed in East Africa following scale up of LLINs. With continued expansion of LLIN coverage in Africa An. arabiensis is likely to remain responsible for residual malaria transmission, and species shifts might be reported over larger areas. Supplementary control measures to LLINs may be necessary to control this vector species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22438864      PMCID: PMC3306310          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Rapid scaling up of long lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) has taken place in sub-Saharan Africa, with associated reductions in malaria transmission reported in several countries. The overall effectiveness of LLINs in reducing malaria transmission is indisputable [1], but the relative efficacy of LLINs against different malaria vector species has only partially been explored. Recent data from East Africa showed strong evidence for shifts in sibling species following the scaling-up of ITN/LLINs, with An. arabiensis becoming the dominant species in habitats that support sympatric An. gambiae and An. arabiensis populations. The most notable example was in western Nyanza province, Kenya, where scale-up of ITNs correlated with a proportional decrease in An. gambiae from around 85% in 1970–1998 to 1% by 2009 [2]. A similar trend was reported in southern Tanzania where a 79% reduction in An. gambiae was documented compared with 38% for An. arabiensis following high LLIN coverage [3]. The Pan-African Malaria Vector Research Consortium (PAMVERC) have tested ITNs and LLINs in experimental huts at two locations in NE Tanzania against the three major African malaria vectors: An. gambiae s.s., An. arabiensis and An. funestus [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Efficacy was compared against these species in terms of insecticide-induced mortality, blood-feeding inhibition and induced exiting rates. The findings raise questions about the capacity of LLINs to control An. arabiensis.

Methods

Rationale

This manuscript compares data from 6 experimental hut trials in which each trial was conducted at two locations in Tanzania, Moshi and Muheza, where An. arabiensis and An. gambiae occur, respectively. Data on mosquitoes entering the huts at each location was compared in terms of overall mortality, mortality of unfed mosquitoes, blood-feeding (inhibition) rates and exiting rates. The overall mortalities, blood feeding and blood-feeding inhibition rates of free flying mosquitoes resulting from net treatments have previously been individually published [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Individual publications are cited in the respective sections. With the re-analysis of the data to extract mortality rates of unfed mosquitoes in comparison with published results the present work illustrates evidence for consistently low mortality of An. arabiensis in the presence of ITNs. This may explain the of increasingly noted trends on population shift from Anopheles gambiae s.s. to An. arabiensis in areas of sympatry.

Ethics statement

The studies were approved by the Medical Research Coordination Committee of the National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania, and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Ethics Committee (Ref: NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol. X/86). Written consent was obtained from all volunteers participating in the study with an understanding of information and identities being kept confidential at all stages of the research and in reporting. During the trial all volunteers were monitored each day for signs of fever or possible side-effects of the ITNs/LLINs.

Study sites

This study used suites of experimental huts in two regions of NE Tanzania (Fig. 1). Those of Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College (KCMC) were situated in Lower Moshi Rice Irrigation Zone (3°22′S, 37°19′E; altitude 800 m) which is an irrigated agricultural area surrounded by upland semi-arid steppe. Experimental huts of the Amani Medical Research Centre (NIMR) were situated in Zenet village, Muheza district, (5°13′S, 38°39′E; altitude 193 m) in a lowland coastal region south-west of Tanga City. The two sites differ in terms of malaria transmission and mosquito species composition. The area around Muheza had high levels of Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmitted by both An. gambiae s.s. and Anopheles funestus s.s. Giles mosquitoes. The Moshi site had low levels of P. falciparum transmission and Anopheles arabiensis Patton is the predominant vector [9]. A modification of polymerase chain reaction method described by Collins et al [10] was used to confirm sub-samples of mosquitoes collected from the study sites in Lower Moshi and Zeneth in Muheza. An. arabiensis from lower Moshi recorded 80–90% mortality to permethrin (0.75%) test papers, indicating low level pyrethroid resistance [11], and 100% mortality to propoxur (0.1%) test papers indicating susceptibility to carbamates [4]. An. gambiae and An. funestus from Zeneth recorded 100% mortality to permethrin (0.75%) and propoxur (0.1%) [4].
Figure 1

Map showing the location of the field stations, in Moshi and Muheza, north-eastern Tanzania.

LLINs & long lasting treatment kits 1- Olyset; (Sumitomo Chemical Company, Tokyo). Manufactured with 2% permethrin incorporated into polyethylene fibres, corresponding to 1000 mg active ingredient/m2. 2- IconMaxx; (Syngenta Professional Products, Basel, Switzerland) lambdacyhalothrin coated polyester fibre at 50 mg/m2. 3- KO Tab 1-2-3 (Bayer Environmental Sciences, Lyons, France) deltamethrin, coated polyester fibre at 25 mg/m2
Table 1

Mortality of mosquitoes freely entering into the huts.

% mortality of all mosquitoes in treatment arm corrected for control mortality (95% CI)% mortality of unfed mosquitoes in treatment arm corrected for control mortality (95% CI)
Type of net An. arabiensis An. gambiae An. funestus An. arabiensis An. gambiae An. funestus
Olyset LN (permethrin)15 (11–18)61 (54–69)72 (66–78)10 (1–20)60 (32–82)74 (63–82)
KO TAB 1-2-3 LN (deltamethrin)38 (33–43)88 (75–101)62 (53–71)38 (37–41)90 (66–97)64 (48–76)
IconMaxx LN (lambdacyhalothrin)44 (37–51)74 (59–89)75 (66–72)45 (24–65)72 (49–86)76 (59–87)
Deltamethrin ITN29 (23–34)76 (73–79)78 (74–83)32 (15–49)76 (65–84)77 (67–85)
Alphacypermethrin ITN36 (31–40)71 (62–80)68 (62–74)41 (19–60)71 (39–89)68 (62–79)
Carbosulfan ITN67 (63–71)99 (97–100)100 (100-100)65 (46–77)99 (97–100)100 (100-100)
Table 2

Cone bioassay tests on treated nets using insectary reared mosquitoes.

% Mortality (no. tested)
Type of net An. arabiensis An. gambiae Reference
Olyset LN83 (55)99 (100) [5], [6]
KO TAB 1-2-3 LN100 (50)100 (50) [7]
IconMaxx LN96 (50)100 (50) [8]
Deltamethrin ITN98 (57)100 (100) [4], [6]
Alphacypermethrin ITN93 (67)84 (100) [5], [6]
Carbosulfan ITN100 (100)100 (100) [4]
ITNs 4- Deltamethrin (5% SC [suspension concentrate]; Bayer Crop Sciences, Lyons, France) treated polyester fibre at 25 mg/m2. 5- Alphacypermethrin (Fendona SC; BASF Agricultural Products, Limburgerhof, Germany) treated polyester fibre at 25 mg/m2. 6- Carbosulfan (8% SC; FMC Corp., Philadelphia, PA, USA) treated polyester fibre at 200 mg/m2.

Mosquito net treatments

Conventionally treated nets made of polyester were dipped with target dosages of insecticide according to WHO recommendations [12]. A total of six holes per net measuring 4×4 cm each were cut into all nets to simulate torn nets as is common in local communities [13]. The long lasting insecticide/binder treatments were applied as per manufacturers' instructions. Target dosages on the ITNs and LLINs was confirmed by the WHO Reference Centre at Gembloux, Belgium, in WHOPES reports of the trials [7], [8] or by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) at LSHTM [14].

Study design

The experimental huts were identical in design at both sites and resembled local housing. They were constructed to a design described by the World Health Organization [13] and others [5], [6], [15] and which was based on the original design of Smith [16] and Smith and Webley [17] for veranda trap huts. There was an eave gap between the wall and roof, a window trap on each wall and a screened veranda on each side. Adult volunteers slept under nets in each hut from 20:30–6:30. Each morning dead and live mosquitoes were collected from the floors, rooms, verandas and window traps and recorded as blood fed, unfed or gravid. Live mosquitoes were provided with 10% glucose solution under controlled temperature and humidity for 24 h before scoring delayed mortality. Sleepers were rotated between huts on successive nights to reduce any bias due to differences in individual attractiveness. The treatments were rotated between huts on successive weeks in accordance with a Latin Square design. The direction of two open verandas was routinely changed from East-West to North-South orientation every 2 weeks. Most trials were of 6 week duration with 36 nights of data collection for each type of net. Species identification done on several samples of Anopheles gambiae taken from the sites gave 100% An. gambiae s.s. from Zeneth, Muheza (N = 60) and 100% An arabiensis from Lower Moshi (N = 60) based on PCR identification results [18]–[20]. All specimens collected in the hut trials identified as members of the An. gambiae complex were recorded as An. arabiensis in Moshi [18], [19] and as An. gambiae in Muheza [20] based on these PCR identification results.

Data processing and analysis

Data was entered into an Excel database and transferred to Stata 9 for data processing and analysis (Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, USA). The principal aim of each study was to compare the efficacy of different types of LLIN or ITN (4 pyrethroid and one non-pyrethroid insecticide) as compared to a negative-control untreated net. Data were analysed separately for the two location strata, and therefore different species, Moshi (An. arabiensis) and Muheza (An. arabiensis, An. funestus) as the species were geographically separated. The outcomes of interest were proportion of mosquitoes blood-feeding, dying and exiting on successive nights. Logistic regression for grouped data was used to estimate the outcomes, within each trial, comparing results for treated and untreated nets clustering by day and adjusting for variation between individual sleepers and huts. Estimated proportions were corrected for control mortality using Abbot's correction.

Results

In all six trials mortality was consistently lower for An. arabiensis as compared with the same treatments against An. gambiae s.s. and An. funestus (Fig. 2). Mortality rates in the untreated control huts was on average 15% for An arabiensis, 5% for An gambiae and 8% for An funestus; in each of the trials the mortality rate in the untreated control was always significantly lower (P<0.001) than in the respective ITN or LLIN treatment. Adjusting the treatment for control mortality made no difference to the trend observed between species; mortality of An arabiensis was always lower than that of An gambiae (Table 1). The carbamate carbosulfan produced higher mortalities than the pyrethroid treatments but showed similar trends to pyrethroids between species with smaller proportions of An. arabiensis being killed. The permethrin (Olyset net) killed the smallest proportions of all. The three alphacyano-pyrethroid treated nets produced rather similar levels of mortality to one another.
Figure 2

Overall mortality of free flying mosquitoes ±95% confidence interval.

Anopheles arabiensis (white), An. gambiae (black) and An. funestus (grey) species.

Overall mortality of free flying mosquitoes ±95% confidence interval.

Anopheles arabiensis (white), An. gambiae (black) and An. funestus (grey) species. Analysis of mortality among unfed mosquitoes collected in the huts gave mortality trends between species similar to that of the combined unfed and blood-fed totals (Table 1). By contrast, cone tests on the treated nets using An. arabiensis and An. gambiae strains showed equally high mortality rates between An. arabiensis and An. gambiae (table 2). The proportion of blood-fed mosquitoes was always significantly lower in experimental huts with insecticide-treated nets than with untreated control nets (Table 3). The level of blood-feeding inhibition was similar between all anopheline species. There were no consistent trends between species that suggested insecticide-treated nets were more protective against one species than another.
Table 3

Blood feeding rates and insecticide-induced feeding inhibition of free flying Anopheline mosquitoes.

% Blood-feeding in treatment arm (95% CI)% Blood feeding inhibition* [% Blood feeding in control arm]
Type of net An. arabiensis An. gambiae An. funestus An. arabiensis An. gambiae An. funestus Reference
Olyset LN22 (15–30)16 (5–40)16 (8–29)60 a [54]27 c [41]50 a [32] [5], [6]
KO TAB 1-2-3 LN12 (8–16)20 (6–47)18 (11–30)45 a [74]64 b [55]62 a [47] [7]
IconMaxx LN7 (2–21)9 (2–34)20 (12–31)66 a [22] 83 a [53]47 b [37] [8]
Deltamethrin ITN18 (13–25)14 (9–20)10 (5–18)24 d [24] 49 a [26] 79 a [45] [4], [6]
Alphacypermethrin ITN17 (10–27)9 (4–19)10 (5–19)24 c [31 c]27 b [68]69 a [32] [5], [6]
Carbosulfan ITN25 (21–30)25 (19–45)32 (23–43)39 a [41]25 d [26] 29 d [26] [5]

Superscript letter indicates statistical significance of blood-feeding inhibition in treatment arm as compared to the control arm; a = P<0.001, b = P<0.01, c = P<0.05, d = P>0.05.

Superscript letter indicates statistical significance of blood-feeding inhibition in treatment arm as compared to the control arm; a = P<0.001, b = P<0.01, c = P<0.05, d = P>0.05. In the reference huts containing untreated nets the mosquito exiting rates were high for each of the three species (Table 4). Each pyrethroid induced low level exiting of top of this natural inclination to exit by the morning. Far fewer anopheline mosquitoes exited huts with carbosulfan nets, presumably because the majority of mosquitoes were incapacitated by the carbosulfan faster than by pyrethroid.
Table 4

Exophily and insecticide-induced exiting of free flying Anopheline mosquitoes.

% Exophily in treatment arm (95% CI)% Insecticide-induced exiting* [% Exophily in untreated control arm]
Type of net An. arabiensis An. gambiae An. funestus An. arabiensis An. gambiae An. funestus
Olyset LN84 (73–91)98 (94–99)93 (85–97)30 a [65]8 b [91]2 d [91]
KO TAB 1-2-3 LN84 (79–87)100 (100 - 100)95 (88–98)21 c [91]10 b [91]10 c [87]
IconMaxx LN87 (77–92)79 (62–89)85 (70–93)6 d [80]0 d [79]0 d [89]
Deltamethrin ITN85 (78–90)93 (89–96)94 (88–97)3 d [82]6 b [88]16 a [81]
Alphacypermethrin ITN84 (80–88)95 (85–98)100 (96–100)2 d [82]4 d [91]9 b [91]
Carbosulfan ITN51 (43–59)60 (48–71)45 (35–57)0 a [71]0 a [88]0 a [88]

Superscript letter indicate statistical significance as compared to the control arm; a = P<0.001, b = P<0.01, c = P<0.05, d = P>0.05.

Superscript letter indicate statistical significance as compared to the control arm; a = P<0.001, b = P<0.01, c = P<0.05, d = P>0.05.

Discussion

The finding that proportionally fewer An. arabiensis than An. gambiae were killed by ITNs/LLINs may explain why in areas of sympatric An. gambiae/arabiensis populations high coverage has resulted a change in the sibling species ratio (species shifts) in favour of An. arabiensis [3], [4]. Species replacement as a result of vector control is not a new phenomenon. Species shifts were recorded in inhabited areas of British Guiana following DDT residual spraying [21]. In this particular example, Anopheles darlingi, an anthropophilic major malaria vector was completely eliminated leaving zoophilic An. aquasalis, An. albitarsis, and An. triannulatus unaffected and a persisting residual malaria transmission. A similar shift of species composition was reported during the inception of large-scale IRS in parts of East Africa; this example being the replacement of An. funestus Giles with An. rivulorum Leeson following IRS with dieldrin in the 1950s [22]. The reasons for this differential effect of IRS on the local vector fauna was attributed to behavioral differences between species which resulted in reduced insecticide contact by An. rivulorum. Several hypotheses have been postulated to explain the more recent shifts from An. gambiae to An. arabiensis including the avoidance of ITNs by An. arabiensis, through to preferential feeding on cattle, through to feeding outdoors or feeding earlier [2], [3] whereas, by contrast, An. gambiae was considered to be less catholic and more restrictive in its host feeding preferences. Species identification using PCR confirmed that An. arabiensis is to be found in lower Moshi [18], [19] and An. gambiae s.s in Muheza [20], [23], [24]. These experimental hut data are the first direct evidence for reduced mortality of host-seeking An. arabiensis (compared to An. gambiae s.s.) when faced with the barrier of an ITN/LLIN. Conceivably, the lower mortality rates in An. arabiensis might be due to an innate process that results in more efficient detoxification of insecticide or, alternatively, to a behavioural trait that results in avoidance of erstwhile lethal dosages. Cone tests on the nets prior to the trials produced rather similar levels of mortality among An. gambiae and An. arabiensis. Low level permethrin resistance has been recorded in An. arabiensis from Lower Moshi [12] but our observervation also extends to alphacyano pyrethroids and to carbosulphan. Differences in intrinsic mortality or capacity to detoxify insecticides between sibling species appear therefore unlikely. Consistent under-dosing of nets in Moshi is another potential, but unlikely explanation for the lower An. arabiensis mortality in hut trials, as both trial sites had treated their nets using the same protocols, and the chemical analysis confirmed similar dosages [7], [8], [14], while the Olyset net was factory treated. Having ruled out intrinsic detoxification and under-dosing, the most likely explanation for lower An. arabiensis mortality was behavioral avoidance of treated net surfaces. Notable behavioural differences have been recorded for the two sibling species before. An. arabiensis of lower Moshi are highly zoophagic and zoophilic as demonstrated by odour baited traps (OBETs) where odour from cattle attracted 90% of wild free-flying An. arabiensis compared to 10% attraction from human odour [25]. An. gambiae in Muheza is known to be anthropophilic [5], [6], [23]. An insecticide-treated bed net is essentially a lethal human-baited trap [26]; thus the level of attractiveness to the human is likely to influence mosquito persistence when faced with a physical net barrier and repellency from the insecticide. We hypothesized that zoophilic An. arabiensis were less persistent in host seeking when confronted with an ITN and abandoned their attempts to feed earlier than anthropophilic An. gambiae, thus a lesser proportion picked up a lethal dose. With that line of argument, if An. arabiensis abandoned host-searching more readily than An. gambiae when confronted with treated nets one would expect the proportion of blood-feeding inhibition to be higher for An. arabiensis. Feeding inhibition turned out to be similar for both sibling species, as was the proportion blood-fed in the untreated control hut. An important factor to consider is the possibility of mosquitoes blood-feeding outdoors either on cattle or humans before entering experimental huts for shelter. If mosquitoes entered huts after feeding outdoors this would bias mortality data as non host-seeking mosquitoes would be less likely to contact treated nets, thus artificially reducing overall mortality. To address this potential confounding factor we analyzed data for unfed mosquitoes. Mortality trends between sibling species for unfed mosquitoes were remarkably similar to trends for total mosquitoes. We also hypothesized that if mosquitoes entered the huts after feeding elsewhere there would be large differences in mortality for fed (low mortality) and un-fed mosquitoes (higher mortality). Mortality data for unfed and blood-fed mosquitoes turned out to be remarkably similar indicating that any mosquitoes entering after feeding from other sources had little impact on overall results. The low mortality rates observed in An. arabiensis cannot be attributed to a greater propensity for exophilic behavior. Contrary to common belief, An. gambiae and An. funestus showed similar levels of exiting to An. arabiensis. ITNs had little effect on proportional exiting rates compared with the control, except for carbosulfan where a large proportion were collected dead in the room having failed to exit before succumbing. As scale up of LLIN population coverage continues, it is likely that species shifts will be reported over larger areas especially among those An. arabiensis populations with higher outdoor feeding tendencies. In some parts of Africa however An. arabiensis has been reported to be strongly anthropophagic with proportions fed on humans in indoor resting mosquitoes ranging from 66% to 100% [27], [28], [29], [30]. Such locations are less likely to show species shifts. Predictive modeling has illustrated the potential impact of climatic change on vector habitat suitability. Increases in maximum and minimum temperature are predicted to have greater impact on habitat suitability for An. gambiae than An. arabiensis; particularly in Eastern and Southern Africa [31]. However this was ruled out as a potential explanation for the sudden species shift observed in W Kenya which coincided with the rapid ITN/LLIN scale up [2]. Taken together, these factors indicate that in the next decade An. arabiensis will be responsible for a greater proportion of malaria transmission in Africa. This does not mean that the vectorial capacity of An. arabiensis will increase, merely that the residual malaria transmission may continue through this sibling species while the role of An. gambiae sensu strictu diminishes. To further reduce malaria transmission additional tools for the control of An. arabiensis may be required; especially in a time where malaria elimination is the target. This could be in the form of An. arabiensis specific measures such as insecticide-treated cattle [32] or as an integrated control strategy including larval control [33] or house-screening [34].
  27 in total

1.  Nation-wide malaria eradication projects in the Americas. III. Eradication of Anopheles darlingi from the inhabited areas of British Guiana by DDT residual spraying.

Authors:  G GIGLIOLI
Journal:  J Natl Malar Soc       Date:  1951-06

2.  A verandah-trap hut for studying the house-frequenting habits of mosquitos and for assessing insecticides. I. A description of the verandah-trap hut and of studies on the egress of Anopheles gambiae giles and Mansonia uniformis (Theo.) from an untreated hut.

Authors:  A Smith
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 1.750

3.  Trial of pyrethroid impregnated bednets in an area of Tanzania holoendemic for malaria. Part 2. Effects on the malaria vector population.

Authors:  S M Magesa; T J Wilkes; A E Mnzava; K J Njunwa; J Myamba; M D Kivuyo; N Hill; J D Lines; C F Curtis
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.112

4.  Four years' entomological study of the transmission of seasonal malaria in Senegal and the bionomics of Anopheles gambiae and A. arabiensis.

Authors:  D Fontenille; L Lochouarn; M Diatta; C Sokhna; I Dia; N Diagne; J J Lemasson; K Ba; A Tall; C Rogier; J F Trape
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.184

5.  Could insecticide-treated cattle reduce Afrotropical malaria transmission? Effects of deltamethrin-treated Zebu on Anopheles arabiensis behaviour and survival in Ethiopia.

Authors:  T Habtewold; A Prior; S J Torr; G Gibson
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.739

Review 6.  Insecticide-treated bed nets and curtains for preventing malaria.

Authors:  C Lengeler
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

7.  A ribosomal RNA gene probe differentiates member species of the Anopheles gambiae complex.

Authors:  F H Collins; M A Mendez; M O Rasmussen; P C Mehaffey; N J Besansky; V Finnerty
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  Observations on the distribution of the Anopheles gambiae complex in Tanzania.

Authors:  A E Mnzava; W L Kilama
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.112

9.  Occurrence of the leucine-to-phenylalanine knockdown resistance (kdr) mutation in Anopheles arabiensis populations in Tanzania, detected by a simplified high-throughput SSOP-ELISA method.

Authors:  Manisha A Kulkarni; Mark Rowland; Michael Alifrangis; Frank W Mosha; Johnson Matowo; Robert Malima; Justin Peter; Eliningaya Kweka; Issa Lyimo; Stephen Magesa; Ali Salanti; Manfred E Rau; Chris Drakeley
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 2.979

10.  Evaluation of KO-Tab 1-2-3: a wash-resistant 'dip-it-yourself' insecticide formulation for long-lasting treatment of mosquito nets.

Authors:  Alison Yates; Raphael N'Guessan; Harparkash Kaur; Martin Akogbéto; Mark Rowland
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 2.979

View more
  104 in total

1.  Pilot Study of a Slow-Release Ivermectin Formulation for Malaria Control in a Pig Model.

Authors:  Carlos Chaccour; Gloria Abizanda; Ángel Irigoyen; José Luis Del Pozo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Comprehensive sterilization of malaria vectors using pyriproxyfen: a step closer to malaria elimination.

Authors:  Dickson W Lwetoijera; Caroline Harris; Samson S Kiware; Gerry F Killeen; Stefan Dongus; Gregor J Devine; Silas Majambere
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Rapid discrimination between Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis by High-Resolution Melt (HRM) analysis.

Authors:  Michael R Zianni; Mahmood R Nikbakhtzadeh; Bryan T Jackson; Jenny Panescu; Woodbridge A Foster
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2013-04

4.  Pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis in western Kenya: phenotypic, metabolic and target site characterizations of three populations.

Authors:  E Ochomo; M N Bayoh; W G Brogdon; J E Gimnig; C Ouma; J M Vulule; E D Walker
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.739

Review 5.  Mathematical modeling of climate change and malaria transmission dynamics: a historical review.

Authors:  Steffen E Eikenberry; Abba B Gumel
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Veterinary endectocides for malaria control and elimination: prospects and challenges.

Authors:  Carlos Chaccour
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The effect of deltamethrin-treated net fencing around cattle enclosures on outdoor-biting mosquitoes in Kumasi, Ghana.

Authors:  Marta Ferreira Maia; Ayimbire Abonuusum; Lena Maria Lorenz; Peter-Henning Clausen; Burkhard Bauer; Rolf Garms; Thomas Kruppa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Influence of insecticide resistance on the biting and resting preferences of malaria vectors in the Gambia.

Authors:  Majidah Hamid-Adiamoh; Davis Nwakanma; Benoit Sessinou Assogba; Mamadou Ousmane Ndiath; Umberto D'Alessandro; Yaw A Afrane; Alfred Amambua-Ngwa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An increasing role of pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles funestus in malaria transmission in the Lake Zone, Tanzania.

Authors:  Natacha Protopopoff; Louisa A Messenger; Nancy S Matowo; Jackline Martin; Manisha A Kulkarni; Jacklin F Mosha; Eliud Lukole; Gladness Isaya; Boniface Shirima; Robert Kaaya; Catherine Moyes; Penelope A Hancock; Mark Rowland; Alphaxard Manjurano; Franklin W Mosha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  The importance of mosquito behavioural adaptations to malaria control in Africa.

Authors:  Michelle L Gatton; Nakul Chitnis; Thomas Churcher; Martin J Donnelly; Azra C Ghani; H Charles J Godfray; Fred Gould; Ian Hastings; John Marshall; Hilary Ranson; Mark Rowland; Jeff Shaman; Steve W Lindsay
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.