E J Peterson1, D J Tyler. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Localized activation of peripheral axons may improve selectivity of peripheral nerve interfaces. Infrared neural stimulation (INS) employs localized delivery to activate neural tissue. This study investigated INS to determine whether localized delivery limited functionality in larger mammalian nerves. APPROACH: The rabbit sciatic nerve was stimulated extraneurally with 1875 nm wavelength infrared light, electrical stimulation, or a combination of both. Infrared-sensitive regions (ISR) of the nerve surface and electromyogram (EMG) recruitment of the Medial Gastrocnemius, Lateral Gastrocnemius, Soleus, and Tibialis Anterior were the primary output measures. Stimulation applied included infrared-only, electrical-only, and combined infrared and electrical. MAIN RESULTS: 81% of nerves tested were sensitive to INS, with 1.7 ± 0.5 ISR detected per nerve. INS was selective to a single muscle within 81% of identified ISR. Activation energy threshold did not change significantly with stimulus power, but motor activation decreased significantly when radiant power was decreased. Maximum INS levels typically recruited up to 2-9% of any muscle. Combined infrared and electrical stimulation differed significantly from electrical recruitment in 7% of cases. SIGNIFICANCE: The observed selectivity of INS indicates that it may be useful in augmenting rehabilitation, but significant challenges remain in increasing sensitivity and response magnitude to improve the functionality of INS.
OBJECTIVE: Localized activation of peripheral axons may improve selectivity of peripheral nerve interfaces. Infrared neural stimulation (INS) employs localized delivery to activate neural tissue. This study investigated INS to determine whether localized delivery limited functionality in larger mammalian nerves. APPROACH: The rabbit sciatic nerve was stimulated extraneurally with 1875 nm wavelength infrared light, electrical stimulation, or a combination of both. Infrared-sensitive regions (ISR) of the nerve surface and electromyogram (EMG) recruitment of the Medial Gastrocnemius, Lateral Gastrocnemius, Soleus, and Tibialis Anterior were the primary output measures. Stimulation applied included infrared-only, electrical-only, and combined infrared and electrical. MAIN RESULTS: 81% of nerves tested were sensitive to INS, with 1.7 ± 0.5 ISR detected per nerve. INS was selective to a single muscle within 81% of identified ISR. Activation energy threshold did not change significantly with stimulus power, but motor activation decreased significantly when radiant power was decreased. Maximum INS levels typically recruited up to 2-9% of any muscle. Combined infrared and electrical stimulation differed significantly from electrical recruitment in 7% of cases. SIGNIFICANCE: The observed selectivity of INS indicates that it may be useful in augmenting rehabilitation, but significant challenges remain in increasing sensitivity and response magnitude to improve the functionality of INS.
Authors: Jonathon D Wells; Sharon Thomsen; Peter Whitaker; E Duco Jansen; Chris C Kao; Peter E Konrad; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: James J FitzGerald; Natalia Lago; Samia Benmerah; Jordi Serra; Christopher P Watling; Ruth E Cameron; Edward Tarte; Stéphanie P Lacour; Stephen B McMahon; James W Fawcett Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Yves T Wang; Shi Gu; Pei Ma; Michiko Watanabe; Andrew M Rollins; Michael W Jenkins Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Jonathan M Cayce; Jonathon D Wells; Jonathan D Malphrus; Chris Kao; Sharon Thomsen; Noel B Tulipan; Peter E Konrad; E Duco Jansen; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen Journal: Neurophotonics Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 3.593